Tight control: a new therapeutic strategy in the management of osteoporotic patients

A. Halasi, G. Kincse, J. Varga, J. Kéri, J. Gaál

Research output: Article

Abstract

Summary: BMD changes in patients under tight control (monitored at 3-month intervals with adjustment of therapy guided by bone turnover markers) and routine management (controlled once a year) were compared. After 1 year, the femoral neck BMD increased significantly in the tight control compared to the routine management group. Introduction: We intended to ascertain whether tight control (i.e., follow-up visits and bone turnover markers/BTM/and parathyroid hormone/PTH/monitoring at 3-month intervals) strategy achieves a statistically greater increase in bone mineral density over the observation period than standard follow-up care (i.e., bone densitometry at 1-year intervals, without BTM monitoring). Methods: We studied involutional osteoporotic patients newly enrolled into chronic care. One hundred and eleven patients underwent tight control, while another 113 received routine treatment (with follow-up visits scheduled at > 1-year intervals). We compared the changes in bone mineral density reflected by the results of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine and of the left femoral neck. Statistical analyses were performed with version 22 of the SPSS software package. Results: In the group of patients under tight control, baseline and follow-up median BMD values were 0.842/0.881 g/cm2 at the L1–4 vertebrae and 0.745/0.749 g/cm2 at the femoral neck. In the group under routine care, the corresponding values were 0.903/0.915 g/cm2 and 0.742/0.72 g/cm2, respectively. The relative changes of the bone mineral density of the femoral neck was significantly (p = 0.041) higher in patients under tight control than in those receiving routine care; however, BMD changes in the lumbar spine were not statistically different. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that adopting tight control as a new therapeutic strategy might be justified in the osteoporosis management. In fact, a greater improvement of BMD can be achieved by treatment according to these principles.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOsteoporosis International
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - jan. 1 2018

Fingerprint

Bone Density
Femur Neck
Spine
Therapeutics
Bone Remodeling
Aftercare
Densitometry
Parathyroid Hormone
Osteoporosis
Software
Observation
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Tight control : a new therapeutic strategy in the management of osteoporotic patients. / Halasi, A.; Kincse, G.; Varga, J.; Kéri, J.; Gaál, J.

In: Osteoporosis International, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Article

@article{160e63b344d04f7d991a5c8639701fce,
title = "Tight control: a new therapeutic strategy in the management of osteoporotic patients",
abstract = "Summary: BMD changes in patients under tight control (monitored at 3-month intervals with adjustment of therapy guided by bone turnover markers) and routine management (controlled once a year) were compared. After 1 year, the femoral neck BMD increased significantly in the tight control compared to the routine management group. Introduction: We intended to ascertain whether tight control (i.e., follow-up visits and bone turnover markers/BTM/and parathyroid hormone/PTH/monitoring at 3-month intervals) strategy achieves a statistically greater increase in bone mineral density over the observation period than standard follow-up care (i.e., bone densitometry at 1-year intervals, without BTM monitoring). Methods: We studied involutional osteoporotic patients newly enrolled into chronic care. One hundred and eleven patients underwent tight control, while another 113 received routine treatment (with follow-up visits scheduled at > 1-year intervals). We compared the changes in bone mineral density reflected by the results of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine and of the left femoral neck. Statistical analyses were performed with version 22 of the SPSS software package. Results: In the group of patients under tight control, baseline and follow-up median BMD values were 0.842/0.881 g/cm2 at the L1–4 vertebrae and 0.745/0.749 g/cm2 at the femoral neck. In the group under routine care, the corresponding values were 0.903/0.915 g/cm2 and 0.742/0.72 g/cm2, respectively. The relative changes of the bone mineral density of the femoral neck was significantly (p = 0.041) higher in patients under tight control than in those receiving routine care; however, BMD changes in the lumbar spine were not statistically different. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that adopting tight control as a new therapeutic strategy might be justified in the osteoporosis management. In fact, a greater improvement of BMD can be achieved by treatment according to these principles.",
keywords = "Osteoporosis, Strategy, Tight control, Treatment",
author = "A. Halasi and G. Kincse and J. Varga and J. K{\'e}ri and J. Ga{\'a}l",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00198-018-4674-7",
language = "English",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "Springer London",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tight control

T2 - a new therapeutic strategy in the management of osteoporotic patients

AU - Halasi, A.

AU - Kincse, G.

AU - Varga, J.

AU - Kéri, J.

AU - Gaál, J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Summary: BMD changes in patients under tight control (monitored at 3-month intervals with adjustment of therapy guided by bone turnover markers) and routine management (controlled once a year) were compared. After 1 year, the femoral neck BMD increased significantly in the tight control compared to the routine management group. Introduction: We intended to ascertain whether tight control (i.e., follow-up visits and bone turnover markers/BTM/and parathyroid hormone/PTH/monitoring at 3-month intervals) strategy achieves a statistically greater increase in bone mineral density over the observation period than standard follow-up care (i.e., bone densitometry at 1-year intervals, without BTM monitoring). Methods: We studied involutional osteoporotic patients newly enrolled into chronic care. One hundred and eleven patients underwent tight control, while another 113 received routine treatment (with follow-up visits scheduled at > 1-year intervals). We compared the changes in bone mineral density reflected by the results of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine and of the left femoral neck. Statistical analyses were performed with version 22 of the SPSS software package. Results: In the group of patients under tight control, baseline and follow-up median BMD values were 0.842/0.881 g/cm2 at the L1–4 vertebrae and 0.745/0.749 g/cm2 at the femoral neck. In the group under routine care, the corresponding values were 0.903/0.915 g/cm2 and 0.742/0.72 g/cm2, respectively. The relative changes of the bone mineral density of the femoral neck was significantly (p = 0.041) higher in patients under tight control than in those receiving routine care; however, BMD changes in the lumbar spine were not statistically different. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that adopting tight control as a new therapeutic strategy might be justified in the osteoporosis management. In fact, a greater improvement of BMD can be achieved by treatment according to these principles.

AB - Summary: BMD changes in patients under tight control (monitored at 3-month intervals with adjustment of therapy guided by bone turnover markers) and routine management (controlled once a year) were compared. After 1 year, the femoral neck BMD increased significantly in the tight control compared to the routine management group. Introduction: We intended to ascertain whether tight control (i.e., follow-up visits and bone turnover markers/BTM/and parathyroid hormone/PTH/monitoring at 3-month intervals) strategy achieves a statistically greater increase in bone mineral density over the observation period than standard follow-up care (i.e., bone densitometry at 1-year intervals, without BTM monitoring). Methods: We studied involutional osteoporotic patients newly enrolled into chronic care. One hundred and eleven patients underwent tight control, while another 113 received routine treatment (with follow-up visits scheduled at > 1-year intervals). We compared the changes in bone mineral density reflected by the results of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine and of the left femoral neck. Statistical analyses were performed with version 22 of the SPSS software package. Results: In the group of patients under tight control, baseline and follow-up median BMD values were 0.842/0.881 g/cm2 at the L1–4 vertebrae and 0.745/0.749 g/cm2 at the femoral neck. In the group under routine care, the corresponding values were 0.903/0.915 g/cm2 and 0.742/0.72 g/cm2, respectively. The relative changes of the bone mineral density of the femoral neck was significantly (p = 0.041) higher in patients under tight control than in those receiving routine care; however, BMD changes in the lumbar spine were not statistically different. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that adopting tight control as a new therapeutic strategy might be justified in the osteoporosis management. In fact, a greater improvement of BMD can be achieved by treatment according to these principles.

KW - Osteoporosis

KW - Strategy

KW - Tight control

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052835741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052835741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-018-4674-7

DO - 10.1007/s00198-018-4674-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 30167720

AN - SCOPUS:85052835741

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

ER -