The π-index: A new indicator for assessing scientific impact

Research output: Article

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are several simple and sophisticated scientometric indicators generally applied in the literature (e.g. total number of publications and citations, citations per journal paper, relative citedness indexes, Hirsch index, etc.), which may characterize the publications of scientists both qualitatively and quantitatively. The calculation methods generally use data referring to the total set of papers studied. Scientific progress, however, may be attributed primarily to information in the highly cited publications. Therefore, a new indicator (π-index) is suggested for comparative assessment of scientists active in similar subject fields. The π-index is equal to one hundredth of the number of citations obtained to the top square root of the total number of journal papers (?elite set of papers?) ranked by the decreasing number of citations. The relation of the π-index to other indexes and its dependence on the field is studied, using data of journal papers of 'highly cited researchers?.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)602-612
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Information Science
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

scientific progress
elite
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{2115c22255c84606b98719b35a92b2ab,
title = "The π-index: A new indicator for assessing scientific impact",
abstract = "There are several simple and sophisticated scientometric indicators generally applied in the literature (e.g. total number of publications and citations, citations per journal paper, relative citedness indexes, Hirsch index, etc.), which may characterize the publications of scientists both qualitatively and quantitatively. The calculation methods generally use data referring to the total set of papers studied. Scientific progress, however, may be attributed primarily to information in the highly cited publications. Therefore, a new indicator (π-index) is suggested for comparative assessment of scientists active in similar subject fields. The π-index is equal to one hundredth of the number of citations obtained to the top square root of the total number of journal papers (?elite set of papers?) ranked by the decreasing number of citations. The relation of the π-index to other indexes and its dependence on the field is studied, using data of journal papers of 'highly cited researchers?.",
keywords = "π-Index, Evaluation of publications, Highly cited papers, Hirsch index, Scientometric indicators",
author = "P. Vinkler",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/0165551509103601",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "602--612",
journal = "Journal of Information Science",
issn = "0165-5515",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The π-index

T2 - A new indicator for assessing scientific impact

AU - Vinkler, P.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - There are several simple and sophisticated scientometric indicators generally applied in the literature (e.g. total number of publications and citations, citations per journal paper, relative citedness indexes, Hirsch index, etc.), which may characterize the publications of scientists both qualitatively and quantitatively. The calculation methods generally use data referring to the total set of papers studied. Scientific progress, however, may be attributed primarily to information in the highly cited publications. Therefore, a new indicator (π-index) is suggested for comparative assessment of scientists active in similar subject fields. The π-index is equal to one hundredth of the number of citations obtained to the top square root of the total number of journal papers (?elite set of papers?) ranked by the decreasing number of citations. The relation of the π-index to other indexes and its dependence on the field is studied, using data of journal papers of 'highly cited researchers?.

AB - There are several simple and sophisticated scientometric indicators generally applied in the literature (e.g. total number of publications and citations, citations per journal paper, relative citedness indexes, Hirsch index, etc.), which may characterize the publications of scientists both qualitatively and quantitatively. The calculation methods generally use data referring to the total set of papers studied. Scientific progress, however, may be attributed primarily to information in the highly cited publications. Therefore, a new indicator (π-index) is suggested for comparative assessment of scientists active in similar subject fields. The π-index is equal to one hundredth of the number of citations obtained to the top square root of the total number of journal papers (?elite set of papers?) ranked by the decreasing number of citations. The relation of the π-index to other indexes and its dependence on the field is studied, using data of journal papers of 'highly cited researchers?.

KW - π-Index

KW - Evaluation of publications

KW - Highly cited papers

KW - Hirsch index

KW - Scientometric indicators

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350067878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350067878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0165551509103601

DO - 10.1177/0165551509103601

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70350067878

VL - 35

SP - 602

EP - 612

JO - Journal of Information Science

JF - Journal of Information Science

SN - 0165-5515

IS - 5

ER -