Seizure semiology inferred from clinical descriptions and from video recordings. How accurate are they?

Simona Alexandra Beniczky, A. Fogarasi, Miri Neufeld, Noémi Becser Andersen, Peter Wolf, Walter van Emde Boas, Sándor Beniczky

Research output: Article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess how accurate the interpretation of seizure semiology is when inferred from witnessed seizure descriptions and from video recordings, five epileptologists analyzed 41 seizures from 30 consecutive patients who had clinical episodes in the epilepsy monitoring unit. For each clinical episode, the consensus conclusions (at least 3 identical choices) based on the descriptions and, separately, of the video recordings were compared with the clinical conclusions at the end of the diagnostic work-up, including data from the video-EEG recordings (reference standard). Consensus conclusion was reached in significantly more cases based on the interpretation of video recordings (88%) than on the descriptions (66%), and the overall accuracy was higher for the video recordings (85%) than for the descriptions (54%). When consensus was reached, the concordance with the reference standard was substantial for the descriptions (k= 0.67) and almost perfect for the video recordings (k= 0.95). Video recordings significantly increase the accuracy of seizure interpretation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-215
Number of pages3
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - jún. 2012

Fingerprint

Video Recording
Seizures
Electroencephalography
Epilepsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Seizure semiology inferred from clinical descriptions and from video recordings. How accurate are they? / Beniczky, Simona Alexandra; Fogarasi, A.; Neufeld, Miri; Andersen, Noémi Becser; Wolf, Peter; van Emde Boas, Walter; Beniczky, Sándor.

In: Epilepsy and Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 2, 06.2012, p. 213-215.

Research output: Article

Beniczky, SA, Fogarasi, A, Neufeld, M, Andersen, NB, Wolf, P, van Emde Boas, W & Beniczky, S 2012, 'Seizure semiology inferred from clinical descriptions and from video recordings. How accurate are they?', Epilepsy and Behavior, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 213-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.03.036
Beniczky, Simona Alexandra ; Fogarasi, A. ; Neufeld, Miri ; Andersen, Noémi Becser ; Wolf, Peter ; van Emde Boas, Walter ; Beniczky, Sándor. / Seizure semiology inferred from clinical descriptions and from video recordings. How accurate are they?. In: Epilepsy and Behavior. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 213-215.
@article{be30aab81e494667b607f1f0a4a112d4,
title = "Seizure semiology inferred from clinical descriptions and from video recordings. How accurate are they?",
abstract = "To assess how accurate the interpretation of seizure semiology is when inferred from witnessed seizure descriptions and from video recordings, five epileptologists analyzed 41 seizures from 30 consecutive patients who had clinical episodes in the epilepsy monitoring unit. For each clinical episode, the consensus conclusions (at least 3 identical choices) based on the descriptions and, separately, of the video recordings were compared with the clinical conclusions at the end of the diagnostic work-up, including data from the video-EEG recordings (reference standard). Consensus conclusion was reached in significantly more cases based on the interpretation of video recordings (88{\%}) than on the descriptions (66{\%}), and the overall accuracy was higher for the video recordings (85{\%}) than for the descriptions (54{\%}). When consensus was reached, the concordance with the reference standard was substantial for the descriptions (k= 0.67) and almost perfect for the video recordings (k= 0.95). Video recordings significantly increase the accuracy of seizure interpretation.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Classification, Seizure semiology, Video recordings, Witnessed descriptions",
author = "Beniczky, {Simona Alexandra} and A. Fogarasi and Miri Neufeld and Andersen, {No{\'e}mi Becser} and Peter Wolf and {van Emde Boas}, Walter and S{\'a}ndor Beniczky",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.03.036",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "213--215",
journal = "Epilepsy and Behavior",
issn = "1525-5050",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seizure semiology inferred from clinical descriptions and from video recordings. How accurate are they?

AU - Beniczky, Simona Alexandra

AU - Fogarasi, A.

AU - Neufeld, Miri

AU - Andersen, Noémi Becser

AU - Wolf, Peter

AU - van Emde Boas, Walter

AU - Beniczky, Sándor

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - To assess how accurate the interpretation of seizure semiology is when inferred from witnessed seizure descriptions and from video recordings, five epileptologists analyzed 41 seizures from 30 consecutive patients who had clinical episodes in the epilepsy monitoring unit. For each clinical episode, the consensus conclusions (at least 3 identical choices) based on the descriptions and, separately, of the video recordings were compared with the clinical conclusions at the end of the diagnostic work-up, including data from the video-EEG recordings (reference standard). Consensus conclusion was reached in significantly more cases based on the interpretation of video recordings (88%) than on the descriptions (66%), and the overall accuracy was higher for the video recordings (85%) than for the descriptions (54%). When consensus was reached, the concordance with the reference standard was substantial for the descriptions (k= 0.67) and almost perfect for the video recordings (k= 0.95). Video recordings significantly increase the accuracy of seizure interpretation.

AB - To assess how accurate the interpretation of seizure semiology is when inferred from witnessed seizure descriptions and from video recordings, five epileptologists analyzed 41 seizures from 30 consecutive patients who had clinical episodes in the epilepsy monitoring unit. For each clinical episode, the consensus conclusions (at least 3 identical choices) based on the descriptions and, separately, of the video recordings were compared with the clinical conclusions at the end of the diagnostic work-up, including data from the video-EEG recordings (reference standard). Consensus conclusion was reached in significantly more cases based on the interpretation of video recordings (88%) than on the descriptions (66%), and the overall accuracy was higher for the video recordings (85%) than for the descriptions (54%). When consensus was reached, the concordance with the reference standard was substantial for the descriptions (k= 0.67) and almost perfect for the video recordings (k= 0.95). Video recordings significantly increase the accuracy of seizure interpretation.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Classification

KW - Seizure semiology

KW - Video recordings

KW - Witnessed descriptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861344942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861344942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.03.036

DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.03.036

M3 - Article

C2 - 22564890

AN - SCOPUS:84861344942

VL - 24

SP - 213

EP - 215

JO - Epilepsy and Behavior

JF - Epilepsy and Behavior

SN - 1525-5050

IS - 2

ER -