Uréterkövek eltávolítására végzett perkután endoszkópos ureterolithotomia és ureterorenoszkópia összehasonlítása

Bérezi Csaba, Fiaskó Tibor, Lorincz László, M. Salah, Farkas Antal, Tállai Béla, Tóth Csaba

Research output: Article

Abstract

The authors performed a retrospective study to compare the effectivity of percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy and the ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral stones. In 93 patients the impacted ureteral stone was removed by percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy (Group 1). In 142 patients ureteroscopy was used to extract the ureteral stones (Group 2). The diameter of stones was 11 ±4 mm in Group 1, and 7±2 mm in Group 2. The average operative time was 32±11 minutes in Group 1, and 41+29 minutes in Group 2. The average time of the hospital stay after the operation was 7.2 ±3.1 day in Group 1, and 3.5±2.5 day in Group 2. The average time of the operation was significantly lower (p=0.006), and the duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly higher (p

Original languageHungarian
Pages (from-to)211-217
Number of pages7
JournalMagyar Urologia
Volume17
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Length of Stay
Operative Time
Retrospective Studies
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • ESWL
  • Impacted stone
  • Percutaneous endoscopic
  • Ureteral stone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Uréterkövek eltávolítására végzett perkután endoszkópos ureterolithotomia és ureterorenoszkópia összehasonlítása. / Csaba, Bérezi; Tibor, Fiaskó; László, Lorincz; Salah, M.; Antal, Farkas; Béla, Tállai; Csaba, Tóth.

In: Magyar Urologia, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2005, p. 211-217.

Research output: Article

Csaba, B, Tibor, F, László, L, Salah, M, Antal, F, Béla, T & Csaba, T 2005, 'Uréterkövek eltávolítására végzett perkután endoszkópos ureterolithotomia és ureterorenoszkópia összehasonlítása', Magyar Urologia, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 211-217.
Csaba, Bérezi ; Tibor, Fiaskó ; László, Lorincz ; Salah, M. ; Antal, Farkas ; Béla, Tállai ; Csaba, Tóth. / Uréterkövek eltávolítására végzett perkután endoszkópos ureterolithotomia és ureterorenoszkópia összehasonlítása. In: Magyar Urologia. 2005 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 211-217.
@article{47eff763e1114107879563d784b03fe9,
title = "Ur{\'e}terk{\"o}vek elt{\'a}vol{\'i}t{\'a}s{\'a}ra v{\'e}gzett perkut{\'a}n endoszk{\'o}pos ureterolithotomia {\'e}s ureterorenoszk{\'o}pia {\"o}sszehasonl{\'i}t{\'a}sa",
abstract = "The authors performed a retrospective study to compare the effectivity of percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy and the ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral stones. In 93 patients the impacted ureteral stone was removed by percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy (Group 1). In 142 patients ureteroscopy was used to extract the ureteral stones (Group 2). The diameter of stones was 11 ±4 mm in Group 1, and 7±2 mm in Group 2. The average operative time was 32±11 minutes in Group 1, and 41+29 minutes in Group 2. The average time of the hospital stay after the operation was 7.2 ±3.1 day in Group 1, and 3.5±2.5 day in Group 2. The average time of the operation was significantly lower (p=0.006), and the duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly higher (p",
keywords = "ESWL, Impacted stone, Percutaneous endoscopic, Ureteral stone",
author = "B{\'e}rezi Csaba and Fiask{\'o} Tibor and Lorincz L{\'a}szl{\'o} and M. Salah and Farkas Antal and T{\'a}llai B{\'e}la and T{\'o}th Csaba",
year = "2005",
language = "Hungarian",
volume = "17",
pages = "211--217",
journal = "Magyar Urologia",
issn = "0864-8921",
publisher = "Society of Hungarian Urological Surgeons",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uréterkövek eltávolítására végzett perkután endoszkópos ureterolithotomia és ureterorenoszkópia összehasonlítása

AU - Csaba, Bérezi

AU - Tibor, Fiaskó

AU - László, Lorincz

AU - Salah, M.

AU - Antal, Farkas

AU - Béla, Tállai

AU - Csaba, Tóth

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The authors performed a retrospective study to compare the effectivity of percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy and the ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral stones. In 93 patients the impacted ureteral stone was removed by percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy (Group 1). In 142 patients ureteroscopy was used to extract the ureteral stones (Group 2). The diameter of stones was 11 ±4 mm in Group 1, and 7±2 mm in Group 2. The average operative time was 32±11 minutes in Group 1, and 41+29 minutes in Group 2. The average time of the hospital stay after the operation was 7.2 ±3.1 day in Group 1, and 3.5±2.5 day in Group 2. The average time of the operation was significantly lower (p=0.006), and the duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly higher (p

AB - The authors performed a retrospective study to compare the effectivity of percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy and the ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral stones. In 93 patients the impacted ureteral stone was removed by percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy (Group 1). In 142 patients ureteroscopy was used to extract the ureteral stones (Group 2). The diameter of stones was 11 ±4 mm in Group 1, and 7±2 mm in Group 2. The average operative time was 32±11 minutes in Group 1, and 41+29 minutes in Group 2. The average time of the hospital stay after the operation was 7.2 ±3.1 day in Group 1, and 3.5±2.5 day in Group 2. The average time of the operation was significantly lower (p=0.006), and the duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly higher (p

KW - ESWL

KW - Impacted stone

KW - Percutaneous endoscopic

KW - Ureteral stone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866930990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866930990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84866930990

VL - 17

SP - 211

EP - 217

JO - Magyar Urologia

JF - Magyar Urologia

SN - 0864-8921

IS - 4

ER -