Printing orientation defines anisotropic mechanical properties in additive manufacturing of upper limb prosthetics

Peter Maroti, Peter Varga, H. Ábrahám, Gyorgy Falk, Tamas Zsebe, Zoltan Meiszterics, Sandor Mano, Zoltan Csernatony, Szilard Rendeki, M. Nyitrai

Research output: Article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are potential future-shaping solutions throughout many special applications in medicine. The mechanical behaviour of the related materials has not yet been fully explored. Here we compared five different industrial quality 3D printing materials produced using various AM processes that can be potentially used in limb-prosthetic development. We focused on the anisotropy of the mechanical and structural properties of these materials by using static and dynamic testing methods and electron microscopy imaging. Both static and dynamic experiments confirmed that amongst the three investigated directions (X, Y and Z), the Z orientation demonstrated, with the exception of polyamide test specimens, the lowest resistance against mechanical forces. Electron microscopy images revealed that greater mechanical stability appeared presumably due to the lengthier cooling time of the individual printed lines. Varying the printing resolution we showed how greater mechanical stability could be achieved, and concluded that special care should be taken when designing the AM processes intended for the fabrication of objects in support of medical applications. Often, the use of poor resolution in respect to quality of printing is desirable and can provide better solutions for actual purposes. These results provide important guidelines in the planning, manufacturing and implementation of higher developed, well-constructed assistive devices.

Original languageEnglish
Article number035403
JournalMaterials Research Express
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - márc. 1 2019

Fingerprint

3D printers
Prosthetics
Printing
Mechanical stability
Mechanical properties
Electron microscopy
Nylons
Medical applications
Polyamides
Medicine
Structural properties
Anisotropy
Cooling
Imaging techniques
Planning
Fabrication
Testing
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Biomaterials
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Metals and Alloys

Cite this

Printing orientation defines anisotropic mechanical properties in additive manufacturing of upper limb prosthetics. / Maroti, Peter; Varga, Peter; Ábrahám, H.; Falk, Gyorgy; Zsebe, Tamas; Meiszterics, Zoltan; Mano, Sandor; Csernatony, Zoltan; Rendeki, Szilard; Nyitrai, M.

In: Materials Research Express, Vol. 6, No. 3, 035403, 01.03.2019.

Research output: Article

Maroti, Peter ; Varga, Peter ; Ábrahám, H. ; Falk, Gyorgy ; Zsebe, Tamas ; Meiszterics, Zoltan ; Mano, Sandor ; Csernatony, Zoltan ; Rendeki, Szilard ; Nyitrai, M. / Printing orientation defines anisotropic mechanical properties in additive manufacturing of upper limb prosthetics. In: Materials Research Express. 2019 ; Vol. 6, No. 3.
@article{7666ffdf7b054fde8920ebf4bfb66635,
title = "Printing orientation defines anisotropic mechanical properties in additive manufacturing of upper limb prosthetics",
abstract = "Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are potential future-shaping solutions throughout many special applications in medicine. The mechanical behaviour of the related materials has not yet been fully explored. Here we compared five different industrial quality 3D printing materials produced using various AM processes that can be potentially used in limb-prosthetic development. We focused on the anisotropy of the mechanical and structural properties of these materials by using static and dynamic testing methods and electron microscopy imaging. Both static and dynamic experiments confirmed that amongst the three investigated directions (X, Y and Z), the Z orientation demonstrated, with the exception of polyamide test specimens, the lowest resistance against mechanical forces. Electron microscopy images revealed that greater mechanical stability appeared presumably due to the lengthier cooling time of the individual printed lines. Varying the printing resolution we showed how greater mechanical stability could be achieved, and concluded that special care should be taken when designing the AM processes intended for the fabrication of objects in support of medical applications. Often, the use of poor resolution in respect to quality of printing is desirable and can provide better solutions for actual purposes. These results provide important guidelines in the planning, manufacturing and implementation of higher developed, well-constructed assistive devices.",
keywords = "additive manufacturing, mechanical testing, polymer, printing orientation, printing resolution, scanning electron microscopy",
author = "Peter Maroti and Peter Varga and H. {\'A}brah{\'a}m and Gyorgy Falk and Tamas Zsebe and Zoltan Meiszterics and Sandor Mano and Zoltan Csernatony and Szilard Rendeki and M. Nyitrai",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1088/2053-1591/aaf5a9",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Materials Research Express",
issn = "2053-1591",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Printing orientation defines anisotropic mechanical properties in additive manufacturing of upper limb prosthetics

AU - Maroti, Peter

AU - Varga, Peter

AU - Ábrahám, H.

AU - Falk, Gyorgy

AU - Zsebe, Tamas

AU - Meiszterics, Zoltan

AU - Mano, Sandor

AU - Csernatony, Zoltan

AU - Rendeki, Szilard

AU - Nyitrai, M.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are potential future-shaping solutions throughout many special applications in medicine. The mechanical behaviour of the related materials has not yet been fully explored. Here we compared five different industrial quality 3D printing materials produced using various AM processes that can be potentially used in limb-prosthetic development. We focused on the anisotropy of the mechanical and structural properties of these materials by using static and dynamic testing methods and electron microscopy imaging. Both static and dynamic experiments confirmed that amongst the three investigated directions (X, Y and Z), the Z orientation demonstrated, with the exception of polyamide test specimens, the lowest resistance against mechanical forces. Electron microscopy images revealed that greater mechanical stability appeared presumably due to the lengthier cooling time of the individual printed lines. Varying the printing resolution we showed how greater mechanical stability could be achieved, and concluded that special care should be taken when designing the AM processes intended for the fabrication of objects in support of medical applications. Often, the use of poor resolution in respect to quality of printing is desirable and can provide better solutions for actual purposes. These results provide important guidelines in the planning, manufacturing and implementation of higher developed, well-constructed assistive devices.

AB - Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies are potential future-shaping solutions throughout many special applications in medicine. The mechanical behaviour of the related materials has not yet been fully explored. Here we compared five different industrial quality 3D printing materials produced using various AM processes that can be potentially used in limb-prosthetic development. We focused on the anisotropy of the mechanical and structural properties of these materials by using static and dynamic testing methods and electron microscopy imaging. Both static and dynamic experiments confirmed that amongst the three investigated directions (X, Y and Z), the Z orientation demonstrated, with the exception of polyamide test specimens, the lowest resistance against mechanical forces. Electron microscopy images revealed that greater mechanical stability appeared presumably due to the lengthier cooling time of the individual printed lines. Varying the printing resolution we showed how greater mechanical stability could be achieved, and concluded that special care should be taken when designing the AM processes intended for the fabrication of objects in support of medical applications. Often, the use of poor resolution in respect to quality of printing is desirable and can provide better solutions for actual purposes. These results provide important guidelines in the planning, manufacturing and implementation of higher developed, well-constructed assistive devices.

KW - additive manufacturing

KW - mechanical testing

KW - polymer

KW - printing orientation

KW - printing resolution

KW - scanning electron microscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059143445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059143445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/2053-1591/aaf5a9

DO - 10.1088/2053-1591/aaf5a9

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Materials Research Express

JF - Materials Research Express

SN - 2053-1591

IS - 3

M1 - 035403

ER -