Van-e vedelem a masolas ellen? Gondolatok a plagiumrol

András Schubert, W. Glänzel

Research output: Article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are at least two reasons why more and more cases of suspected plagiarism are perceived in the scientifi c literature. On one hand, the ever strengthening publication pressure makes easier for the authors, reviewers and editors to infringe or overlook this serious ethical misdemeanor; on the other hand, with the development of text analysis software, detecting text similarities became a simple task. The judgement of actual cases, however, requires well-grounded professional knowledge and prudent human decisions.

Original languageHungarian
Pages (from-to)2052-2053
Number of pages2
JournalOrvosi hetilap
Volume156
Issue number50
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - dec. 1 2015

Fingerprint

Plagiarism
Publications
Software
Pressure

Keywords

  • Plagiarism
  • Publication ethics
  • Scientometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Van-e vedelem a masolas ellen? Gondolatok a plagiumrol. / Schubert, András; Glänzel, W.

In: Orvosi hetilap, Vol. 156, No. 50, 01.12.2015, p. 2052-2053.

Research output: Article

Schubert, András ; Glänzel, W. / Van-e vedelem a masolas ellen? Gondolatok a plagiumrol. In: Orvosi hetilap. 2015 ; Vol. 156, No. 50. pp. 2052-2053.
@article{10e4a29b21dd4c82932291fdfcd39b72,
title = "Van-e vedelem a masolas ellen? Gondolatok a plagiumrol",
abstract = "There are at least two reasons why more and more cases of suspected plagiarism are perceived in the scientifi c literature. On one hand, the ever strengthening publication pressure makes easier for the authors, reviewers and editors to infringe or overlook this serious ethical misdemeanor; on the other hand, with the development of text analysis software, detecting text similarities became a simple task. The judgement of actual cases, however, requires well-grounded professional knowledge and prudent human decisions.",
keywords = "Plagiarism, Publication ethics, Scientometrics",
author = "Andr{\'a}s Schubert and W. Gl{\"a}nzel",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1556/650.2015.30225",
language = "Hungarian",
volume = "156",
pages = "2052--2053",
journal = "Orvosi Hetilap",
issn = "0030-6002",
publisher = "Akademiai Kiado",
number = "50",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Van-e vedelem a masolas ellen? Gondolatok a plagiumrol

AU - Schubert, András

AU - Glänzel, W.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - There are at least two reasons why more and more cases of suspected plagiarism are perceived in the scientifi c literature. On one hand, the ever strengthening publication pressure makes easier for the authors, reviewers and editors to infringe or overlook this serious ethical misdemeanor; on the other hand, with the development of text analysis software, detecting text similarities became a simple task. The judgement of actual cases, however, requires well-grounded professional knowledge and prudent human decisions.

AB - There are at least two reasons why more and more cases of suspected plagiarism are perceived in the scientifi c literature. On one hand, the ever strengthening publication pressure makes easier for the authors, reviewers and editors to infringe or overlook this serious ethical misdemeanor; on the other hand, with the development of text analysis software, detecting text similarities became a simple task. The judgement of actual cases, however, requires well-grounded professional knowledge and prudent human decisions.

KW - Plagiarism

KW - Publication ethics

KW - Scientometrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951032998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951032998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1556/650.2015.30225

DO - 10.1556/650.2015.30225

M3 - Article

C2 - 26639647

AN - SCOPUS:84951032998

VL - 156

SP - 2052

EP - 2053

JO - Orvosi Hetilap

JF - Orvosi Hetilap

SN - 0030-6002

IS - 50

ER -