Does the A-not-B error in adult pet dogs indicate sensitivity to human communication?

Anna Kis, J. Topál, M. Gácsi, Friederike Range, Ludwig Huber, A. Miklósi, Zsófia Virányi

Research output: Article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent dog-infant comparisons have indicated that the experimenter's communicative signals in object hide-and-search tasks increase the probability of perseverative (A-not-B) errors in both species (Topál et al. 2009). These behaviourally similar results, however, might reflect different mechanisms in dogs and in children. Similar errors may occur if the motor response of retrieving the object during the A trials cannot be inhibited in the B trials or if the experimenter's movements and signals toward the A hiding place in the B trials ('sham-baiting') distract the dogs' attention. In order to test these hypotheses, we tested dogs similarly to Topál et al. (2009) but eliminated the motor search in the A trials and 'sham-baiting' in the B trials. We found that neither an inability to inhibit previously rewarded motor response nor insufficiencies in their working memory and/or attention skills can explain dogs' erroneous choices. Further, we replicated the finding that dogs have a strong tendency to commit the A-not-B error after ostensive-communicative hiding and demonstrated the crucial effect of socio-communicative cues as the A-not-B error diminishes when location B is ostensively enhanced. These findings further support the hypothesis that the dogs' A-not-B error may reflect a special sensitivity to human communicative cues. Such object-hiding and search tasks provide a typical case for how susceptibility to human social signals could (mis)lead domestic dogs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)737-743
Number of pages7
JournalAnimal Cognition
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - júl. 2012

Fingerprint

Pets
communication (human)
pets
Communication
communication
Dogs
dogs
baiting
Cues
hides and skins
dog
pet
Short-Term Memory
trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Does the A-not-B error in adult pet dogs indicate sensitivity to human communication? / Kis, Anna; Topál, J.; Gácsi, M.; Range, Friederike; Huber, Ludwig; Miklósi, A.; Virányi, Zsófia.

In: Animal Cognition, Vol. 15, No. 4, 07.2012, p. 737-743.

Research output: Article

Kis, Anna ; Topál, J. ; Gácsi, M. ; Range, Friederike ; Huber, Ludwig ; Miklósi, A. ; Virányi, Zsófia. / Does the A-not-B error in adult pet dogs indicate sensitivity to human communication?. In: Animal Cognition. 2012 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 737-743.
@article{d3502f8cc0be4427bbfb3c249b2dae95,
title = "Does the A-not-B error in adult pet dogs indicate sensitivity to human communication?",
abstract = "Recent dog-infant comparisons have indicated that the experimenter's communicative signals in object hide-and-search tasks increase the probability of perseverative (A-not-B) errors in both species (Top{\'a}l et al. 2009). These behaviourally similar results, however, might reflect different mechanisms in dogs and in children. Similar errors may occur if the motor response of retrieving the object during the A trials cannot be inhibited in the B trials or if the experimenter's movements and signals toward the A hiding place in the B trials ('sham-baiting') distract the dogs' attention. In order to test these hypotheses, we tested dogs similarly to Top{\'a}l et al. (2009) but eliminated the motor search in the A trials and 'sham-baiting' in the B trials. We found that neither an inability to inhibit previously rewarded motor response nor insufficiencies in their working memory and/or attention skills can explain dogs' erroneous choices. Further, we replicated the finding that dogs have a strong tendency to commit the A-not-B error after ostensive-communicative hiding and demonstrated the crucial effect of socio-communicative cues as the A-not-B error diminishes when location B is ostensively enhanced. These findings further support the hypothesis that the dogs' A-not-B error may reflect a special sensitivity to human communicative cues. Such object-hiding and search tasks provide a typical case for how susceptibility to human social signals could (mis)lead domestic dogs.",
keywords = "A-not-B error, Communication, Dog, Social cognition",
author = "Anna Kis and J. Top{\'a}l and M. G{\'a}csi and Friederike Range and Ludwig Huber and A. Mikl{\'o}si and Zs{\'o}fia Vir{\'a}nyi",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10071-012-0481-2",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "737--743",
journal = "Animal Cognition",
issn = "1435-9448",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the A-not-B error in adult pet dogs indicate sensitivity to human communication?

AU - Kis, Anna

AU - Topál, J.

AU - Gácsi, M.

AU - Range, Friederike

AU - Huber, Ludwig

AU - Miklósi, A.

AU - Virányi, Zsófia

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Recent dog-infant comparisons have indicated that the experimenter's communicative signals in object hide-and-search tasks increase the probability of perseverative (A-not-B) errors in both species (Topál et al. 2009). These behaviourally similar results, however, might reflect different mechanisms in dogs and in children. Similar errors may occur if the motor response of retrieving the object during the A trials cannot be inhibited in the B trials or if the experimenter's movements and signals toward the A hiding place in the B trials ('sham-baiting') distract the dogs' attention. In order to test these hypotheses, we tested dogs similarly to Topál et al. (2009) but eliminated the motor search in the A trials and 'sham-baiting' in the B trials. We found that neither an inability to inhibit previously rewarded motor response nor insufficiencies in their working memory and/or attention skills can explain dogs' erroneous choices. Further, we replicated the finding that dogs have a strong tendency to commit the A-not-B error after ostensive-communicative hiding and demonstrated the crucial effect of socio-communicative cues as the A-not-B error diminishes when location B is ostensively enhanced. These findings further support the hypothesis that the dogs' A-not-B error may reflect a special sensitivity to human communicative cues. Such object-hiding and search tasks provide a typical case for how susceptibility to human social signals could (mis)lead domestic dogs.

AB - Recent dog-infant comparisons have indicated that the experimenter's communicative signals in object hide-and-search tasks increase the probability of perseverative (A-not-B) errors in both species (Topál et al. 2009). These behaviourally similar results, however, might reflect different mechanisms in dogs and in children. Similar errors may occur if the motor response of retrieving the object during the A trials cannot be inhibited in the B trials or if the experimenter's movements and signals toward the A hiding place in the B trials ('sham-baiting') distract the dogs' attention. In order to test these hypotheses, we tested dogs similarly to Topál et al. (2009) but eliminated the motor search in the A trials and 'sham-baiting' in the B trials. We found that neither an inability to inhibit previously rewarded motor response nor insufficiencies in their working memory and/or attention skills can explain dogs' erroneous choices. Further, we replicated the finding that dogs have a strong tendency to commit the A-not-B error after ostensive-communicative hiding and demonstrated the crucial effect of socio-communicative cues as the A-not-B error diminishes when location B is ostensively enhanced. These findings further support the hypothesis that the dogs' A-not-B error may reflect a special sensitivity to human communicative cues. Such object-hiding and search tasks provide a typical case for how susceptibility to human social signals could (mis)lead domestic dogs.

KW - A-not-B error

KW - Communication

KW - Dog

KW - Social cognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862623739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862623739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10071-012-0481-2

DO - 10.1007/s10071-012-0481-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 22460627

AN - SCOPUS:84862623739

VL - 15

SP - 737

EP - 743

JO - Animal Cognition

JF - Animal Cognition

SN - 1435-9448

IS - 4

ER -