Characteristics of microscale evapotranspiration: A comparative analysis

F. Ács, G. Szász

Research output: Article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evapotranspiration characteristics on the point-scale (several hundred square meters) and the local scale (several square kilometers) are analysed by comparing a deterministic and a statistical - deterministic surface energy balance model. The vegetation surface variability is represented by both the surface heterogeneity and inhomogeneity. Heterogeneity means the mosaic of wet (wif ≠ 0) and dry (1-wif) fractions of vegetation surface, while inhomogeneity addresses small scale variations of soil moisture content. The microscale characteristics of evapotranspiration are considered in terms of analysing evapotranspiration Ev versus soil moisture content of χ, relative frequency distribution characteristics of Ev(χ) and the aggregation algorithms for its estimation. The analyses are performed for loam soil type under different atmospheric forcing conditions. The main result is as follows: For dry vegetation surface (wif = 0), the relationship between the aggregated (χagg) and the area-averaged (χm) soil moisture content is nonlinear and depends on both the states of the surface and the atmospheric forcing conditions. In the study, we assumed that there are no advective effects and mesoscale circulation patterns induced by surface discontinuities. Based on this fact it seems unlikely to be able to construct an aggregation algorithm for calculating χagg without inclusion of the atmospheric forcing conditions. This means that it will be difficult to construct a simple formula for calculating area-averaged transpiration, if it is possible at all.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-205
Number of pages17
JournalTheoretical and Applied Climatology
Volume73
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - dec. 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Characteristics of microscale evapotranspiration: A comparative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this