### Abstract

Abstract: The optimization of the variance of a portfolio of N independent but not identically distributed assets, supplemented by a budget constraint and an asymmetric ℓ_{1} regularizer, is carried out analytically by the replica method borrowed from the theory of disordered systems. The asymmetric regularizer allows us to penalize short and long positions differently, so the present treatment includes the no-short-constrained portfolio optimization problem as a special case. Results are presented for the out-of-sample and the in-sample estimator of the regularized variance, the relative estimation error, the density of the assets eliminated from the portfolio by the regularizer, and the distribution of the optimal portfolio weights. We have studied the dependence of these quantities on the ratio r of the portfolio’s dimension N to the sample size T, and on the strength of the regularizer. We have checked the analytic results by numerical simulations, and found general agreement. Regularization extends the interval where the optimization can be carried out, and suppresses the large sample fluctuations, but the performance of ℓ_{1} regularization is rather disappointing: if the sample size is large relative to the dimension, i.e. r is small, the regularizer does not play any role, while for r’s where the regularizer starts to be felt the estimation error is already so large as to make the whole optimization exercise pointless. We find that the ℓ_{1} regularization can eliminate at most half the assets from the portfolio (by setting their weights to exactly zero), corresponding to this there is a critical ratio r = 2 beyond which the ℓ_{1} regularized variance cannot be optimized: the regularized variance becomes constant over the simplex. These facts do not seem to have been noticed in the literature. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

???language??? | English |
---|---|

???articleNumber??? | 8 |

???journalAssociation??? | European Physical Journal B |

???volume??? | 92 |

???journalNumber??? | 1 |

???DOIs??? | |

???publicationStatus??? | Published - jan. 1 2019 |

### Fingerprint

### Keywords

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Condensed Matter Physics

### Cite this

_{1}constraint.

*European Physical Journal B*,

*92*(1), [8]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2018-90456-2

**Analytic approach to variance optimization under an ℓ _{1} constraint.** / Kondor, I.; Papp, G.; Caccioli, Fabio.

???family-name???: Article

_{1}constraint',

*European Physical Journal B*, ???journal.volume??? 92, ???journalNumber??? 1, 8. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2018-90456-2

_{1}constraint. European Physical Journal B. 2019 jan. 1;92(1). 8. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2018-90456-2

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analytic approach to variance optimization under an ℓ 1 constraint

AU - Kondor, I.

AU - Papp, G.

AU - Caccioli, Fabio

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Abstract: The optimization of the variance of a portfolio of N independent but not identically distributed assets, supplemented by a budget constraint and an asymmetric ℓ1 regularizer, is carried out analytically by the replica method borrowed from the theory of disordered systems. The asymmetric regularizer allows us to penalize short and long positions differently, so the present treatment includes the no-short-constrained portfolio optimization problem as a special case. Results are presented for the out-of-sample and the in-sample estimator of the regularized variance, the relative estimation error, the density of the assets eliminated from the portfolio by the regularizer, and the distribution of the optimal portfolio weights. We have studied the dependence of these quantities on the ratio r of the portfolio’s dimension N to the sample size T, and on the strength of the regularizer. We have checked the analytic results by numerical simulations, and found general agreement. Regularization extends the interval where the optimization can be carried out, and suppresses the large sample fluctuations, but the performance of ℓ1 regularization is rather disappointing: if the sample size is large relative to the dimension, i.e. r is small, the regularizer does not play any role, while for r’s where the regularizer starts to be felt the estimation error is already so large as to make the whole optimization exercise pointless. We find that the ℓ1 regularization can eliminate at most half the assets from the portfolio (by setting their weights to exactly zero), corresponding to this there is a critical ratio r = 2 beyond which the ℓ1 regularized variance cannot be optimized: the regularized variance becomes constant over the simplex. These facts do not seem to have been noticed in the literature. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

AB - Abstract: The optimization of the variance of a portfolio of N independent but not identically distributed assets, supplemented by a budget constraint and an asymmetric ℓ1 regularizer, is carried out analytically by the replica method borrowed from the theory of disordered systems. The asymmetric regularizer allows us to penalize short and long positions differently, so the present treatment includes the no-short-constrained portfolio optimization problem as a special case. Results are presented for the out-of-sample and the in-sample estimator of the regularized variance, the relative estimation error, the density of the assets eliminated from the portfolio by the regularizer, and the distribution of the optimal portfolio weights. We have studied the dependence of these quantities on the ratio r of the portfolio’s dimension N to the sample size T, and on the strength of the regularizer. We have checked the analytic results by numerical simulations, and found general agreement. Regularization extends the interval where the optimization can be carried out, and suppresses the large sample fluctuations, but the performance of ℓ1 regularization is rather disappointing: if the sample size is large relative to the dimension, i.e. r is small, the regularizer does not play any role, while for r’s where the regularizer starts to be felt the estimation error is already so large as to make the whole optimization exercise pointless. We find that the ℓ1 regularization can eliminate at most half the assets from the portfolio (by setting their weights to exactly zero), corresponding to this there is a critical ratio r = 2 beyond which the ℓ1 regularized variance cannot be optimized: the regularized variance becomes constant over the simplex. These facts do not seem to have been noticed in the literature. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

KW - Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059844146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059844146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90456-2

DO - 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90456-2

M3 - Article

VL - 92

JO - Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter and Quanta

T2 - Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter and Quanta

JF - Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter and Quanta

SN - 1434-6028

IS - 1

M1 - 8

ER -