Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task?

Krisztina Kupán, A. Miklósi, Gy. Gergely, J. Topál

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many argue that dogs show unique susceptibility to human communicative signals that make them suitable for being engaged in complex co-operation with humans. It has also been revealed that socially provided information is particularly effective in influencing the behaviour of dogs even when the human's action demonstration conveys inefficient or mistaken solution of task. It is unclear, however, how the communicative nature of the demonstration context and the presence of the human demonstrator affect the dogs' object-choice behaviour in observational learning situations. In order to unfold the effects of these factors, 76 adult pet dogs could observe a communicative or a non-communicative demonstration in which the human retrieved a tennis ball from under an opaque container while manipulating another distant and obviously empty (transparent) one. Subjects were then allowed to choose either in the presence of the demonstrator or after she left the room. Results showed a significant main effect of the demonstration context (presence or absence of the human's communicative signals), and we also found some evidence for the response-modifying effect of the presence of the human demonstrator during the dogs' choice. That is, dogs predominantly chose the baited container, but if the demonstration context was communicative and the human was present during the dogs' choice, subjects' tendency to select the baited container has been reduced. In agreement with the studies showing sensitivity to human's communicative signals in dogs, these findings point to a special form of social influence in observational learning situations when it comes to learning about causally opaque and less efficient (compared to what comes natural to the dog) action demonstrations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-268
Number of pages10
JournalAnimal Cognition
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

containers
learning
Learning
Dogs
dogs
Choice Behavior
Tennis
container
dog
Pets
pets
effect

Keywords

  • Communicative signals
  • Dog
  • Dog-human interaction
  • Social learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task? / Kupán, Krisztina; Miklósi, A.; Gergely, Gy.; Topál, J.

In: Animal Cognition, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2011, p. 259-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9da9a979120c47e7b962483934a2b8c2,
title = "Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task?",
abstract = "Many argue that dogs show unique susceptibility to human communicative signals that make them suitable for being engaged in complex co-operation with humans. It has also been revealed that socially provided information is particularly effective in influencing the behaviour of dogs even when the human's action demonstration conveys inefficient or mistaken solution of task. It is unclear, however, how the communicative nature of the demonstration context and the presence of the human demonstrator affect the dogs' object-choice behaviour in observational learning situations. In order to unfold the effects of these factors, 76 adult pet dogs could observe a communicative or a non-communicative demonstration in which the human retrieved a tennis ball from under an opaque container while manipulating another distant and obviously empty (transparent) one. Subjects were then allowed to choose either in the presence of the demonstrator or after she left the room. Results showed a significant main effect of the demonstration context (presence or absence of the human's communicative signals), and we also found some evidence for the response-modifying effect of the presence of the human demonstrator during the dogs' choice. That is, dogs predominantly chose the baited container, but if the demonstration context was communicative and the human was present during the dogs' choice, subjects' tendency to select the baited container has been reduced. In agreement with the studies showing sensitivity to human's communicative signals in dogs, these findings point to a special form of social influence in observational learning situations when it comes to learning about causally opaque and less efficient (compared to what comes natural to the dog) action demonstrations.",
keywords = "Communicative signals, Dog, Dog-human interaction, Social learning",
author = "Krisztina Kup{\'a}n and A. Mikl{\'o}si and Gy. Gergely and J. Top{\'a}l",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/s10071-010-0359-0",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "259--268",
journal = "Animal Cognition",
issn = "1435-9448",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do dogs (Canis familiaris) select the empty container in an observational learning task?

AU - Kupán, Krisztina

AU - Miklósi, A.

AU - Gergely, Gy.

AU - Topál, J.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Many argue that dogs show unique susceptibility to human communicative signals that make them suitable for being engaged in complex co-operation with humans. It has also been revealed that socially provided information is particularly effective in influencing the behaviour of dogs even when the human's action demonstration conveys inefficient or mistaken solution of task. It is unclear, however, how the communicative nature of the demonstration context and the presence of the human demonstrator affect the dogs' object-choice behaviour in observational learning situations. In order to unfold the effects of these factors, 76 adult pet dogs could observe a communicative or a non-communicative demonstration in which the human retrieved a tennis ball from under an opaque container while manipulating another distant and obviously empty (transparent) one. Subjects were then allowed to choose either in the presence of the demonstrator or after she left the room. Results showed a significant main effect of the demonstration context (presence or absence of the human's communicative signals), and we also found some evidence for the response-modifying effect of the presence of the human demonstrator during the dogs' choice. That is, dogs predominantly chose the baited container, but if the demonstration context was communicative and the human was present during the dogs' choice, subjects' tendency to select the baited container has been reduced. In agreement with the studies showing sensitivity to human's communicative signals in dogs, these findings point to a special form of social influence in observational learning situations when it comes to learning about causally opaque and less efficient (compared to what comes natural to the dog) action demonstrations.

AB - Many argue that dogs show unique susceptibility to human communicative signals that make them suitable for being engaged in complex co-operation with humans. It has also been revealed that socially provided information is particularly effective in influencing the behaviour of dogs even when the human's action demonstration conveys inefficient or mistaken solution of task. It is unclear, however, how the communicative nature of the demonstration context and the presence of the human demonstrator affect the dogs' object-choice behaviour in observational learning situations. In order to unfold the effects of these factors, 76 adult pet dogs could observe a communicative or a non-communicative demonstration in which the human retrieved a tennis ball from under an opaque container while manipulating another distant and obviously empty (transparent) one. Subjects were then allowed to choose either in the presence of the demonstrator or after she left the room. Results showed a significant main effect of the demonstration context (presence or absence of the human's communicative signals), and we also found some evidence for the response-modifying effect of the presence of the human demonstrator during the dogs' choice. That is, dogs predominantly chose the baited container, but if the demonstration context was communicative and the human was present during the dogs' choice, subjects' tendency to select the baited container has been reduced. In agreement with the studies showing sensitivity to human's communicative signals in dogs, these findings point to a special form of social influence in observational learning situations when it comes to learning about causally opaque and less efficient (compared to what comes natural to the dog) action demonstrations.

KW - Communicative signals

KW - Dog

KW - Dog-human interaction

KW - Social learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951774201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951774201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10071-010-0359-0

DO - 10.1007/s10071-010-0359-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 21140185

AN - SCOPUS:79951774201

VL - 14

SP - 259

EP - 268

JO - Animal Cognition

JF - Animal Cognition

SN - 1435-9448

IS - 2

ER -