What or where? The meaning of referential human pointing for dogs (Canis familiaris)

Tibor Tauzin, Andor Csík, Anna Kis, J. Topál

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dogs have a unique capacity to follow human pointing, and thus it is often assumed that they can comprehend the referential meaning of such signals. However, it is still unclear whether dogs perceive human directional gestures as signals referring to a target object (indicating what to manipulate) or a spatial cue (indicating where to do something). In the present study, we investigated which of these alternative interpretations may explain dogs' responses to human pointing gestures in ostensive communicative and nonostensive cuing contexts. To test whether dogs select the cued object or the cued location, subjects were presented with 2 alternative object-choice trials. An experimenter first attracted the attention of the dog either by calling the dog's name and looking at it (ostensive condition, n = 24) or by clapping the hands (nonostensive condition, n = 24) then pointed at 1 of 2 different toy objects. Subsequently, the experimenter switched the location of the 2 target objects in full view of the dogs by grasping the objects and making a 180° turn. Dogs were then allowed to choose between the 2 objects. In the ostensive condition, dogs showed a significant bias toward the cued location compared with the nonostensive condition in which they performed at chance. These results suggest that pointing refers to a direction or location for dogs, but only if they are addressed with ostensive cues that indicate the communicative intention of the signaler.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)334-338
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Comparative Psychology
Volume129
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Dogs
dogs
Gestures
Cues
dog
toys
Play and Playthings
Names
hands
Hand
testing

Keywords

  • Dog
  • Location bias
  • Object bias
  • Ostensive communication
  • Pointing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

What or where? The meaning of referential human pointing for dogs (Canis familiaris). / Tauzin, Tibor; Csík, Andor; Kis, Anna; Topál, J.

In: Journal of Comparative Psychology, Vol. 129, No. 4, 01.11.2015, p. 334-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tauzin, Tibor ; Csík, Andor ; Kis, Anna ; Topál, J. / What or where? The meaning of referential human pointing for dogs (Canis familiaris). In: Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 129, No. 4. pp. 334-338.
@article{37b17424b1c6489989b7c7bf724cb840,
title = "What or where? The meaning of referential human pointing for dogs (Canis familiaris)",
abstract = "Dogs have a unique capacity to follow human pointing, and thus it is often assumed that they can comprehend the referential meaning of such signals. However, it is still unclear whether dogs perceive human directional gestures as signals referring to a target object (indicating what to manipulate) or a spatial cue (indicating where to do something). In the present study, we investigated which of these alternative interpretations may explain dogs' responses to human pointing gestures in ostensive communicative and nonostensive cuing contexts. To test whether dogs select the cued object or the cued location, subjects were presented with 2 alternative object-choice trials. An experimenter first attracted the attention of the dog either by calling the dog's name and looking at it (ostensive condition, n = 24) or by clapping the hands (nonostensive condition, n = 24) then pointed at 1 of 2 different toy objects. Subsequently, the experimenter switched the location of the 2 target objects in full view of the dogs by grasping the objects and making a 180° turn. Dogs were then allowed to choose between the 2 objects. In the ostensive condition, dogs showed a significant bias toward the cued location compared with the nonostensive condition in which they performed at chance. These results suggest that pointing refers to a direction or location for dogs, but only if they are addressed with ostensive cues that indicate the communicative intention of the signaler.",
keywords = "Dog, Location bias, Object bias, Ostensive communication, Pointing",
author = "Tibor Tauzin and Andor Cs{\'i}k and Anna Kis and J. Top{\'a}l",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0039462",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "334--338",
journal = "Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)",
issn = "0735-7036",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What or where? The meaning of referential human pointing for dogs (Canis familiaris)

AU - Tauzin, Tibor

AU - Csík, Andor

AU - Kis, Anna

AU - Topál, J.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Dogs have a unique capacity to follow human pointing, and thus it is often assumed that they can comprehend the referential meaning of such signals. However, it is still unclear whether dogs perceive human directional gestures as signals referring to a target object (indicating what to manipulate) or a spatial cue (indicating where to do something). In the present study, we investigated which of these alternative interpretations may explain dogs' responses to human pointing gestures in ostensive communicative and nonostensive cuing contexts. To test whether dogs select the cued object or the cued location, subjects were presented with 2 alternative object-choice trials. An experimenter first attracted the attention of the dog either by calling the dog's name and looking at it (ostensive condition, n = 24) or by clapping the hands (nonostensive condition, n = 24) then pointed at 1 of 2 different toy objects. Subsequently, the experimenter switched the location of the 2 target objects in full view of the dogs by grasping the objects and making a 180° turn. Dogs were then allowed to choose between the 2 objects. In the ostensive condition, dogs showed a significant bias toward the cued location compared with the nonostensive condition in which they performed at chance. These results suggest that pointing refers to a direction or location for dogs, but only if they are addressed with ostensive cues that indicate the communicative intention of the signaler.

AB - Dogs have a unique capacity to follow human pointing, and thus it is often assumed that they can comprehend the referential meaning of such signals. However, it is still unclear whether dogs perceive human directional gestures as signals referring to a target object (indicating what to manipulate) or a spatial cue (indicating where to do something). In the present study, we investigated which of these alternative interpretations may explain dogs' responses to human pointing gestures in ostensive communicative and nonostensive cuing contexts. To test whether dogs select the cued object or the cued location, subjects were presented with 2 alternative object-choice trials. An experimenter first attracted the attention of the dog either by calling the dog's name and looking at it (ostensive condition, n = 24) or by clapping the hands (nonostensive condition, n = 24) then pointed at 1 of 2 different toy objects. Subsequently, the experimenter switched the location of the 2 target objects in full view of the dogs by grasping the objects and making a 180° turn. Dogs were then allowed to choose between the 2 objects. In the ostensive condition, dogs showed a significant bias toward the cued location compared with the nonostensive condition in which they performed at chance. These results suggest that pointing refers to a direction or location for dogs, but only if they are addressed with ostensive cues that indicate the communicative intention of the signaler.

KW - Dog

KW - Location bias

KW - Object bias

KW - Ostensive communication

KW - Pointing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947488727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947488727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0039462

DO - 10.1037/a0039462

M3 - Article

C2 - 26147704

AN - SCOPUS:84947488727

VL - 129

SP - 334

EP - 338

JO - Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)

JF - Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)

SN - 0735-7036

IS - 4

ER -