Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents

B. Livingstone, Andrew M. Prentice, W. Andrew Coward, John J. Strain, Alison E. Black, Pater S W Davies, Clodagh M. Stewart, P. Gerald McKenna, Roger G. Whitehead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

303 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Energy intakes assessed by 7-d weighed dietary records (EI-WDRs) and did histories (El-DHs) were compared with concurrent estimates of total energy expenditure (TEE) by the doubly labeled water method in 78 subjects aged 3-18 y. EI-WDRs were not obtained from the 3- and 5-y-old subjects. EI-WDRs in the 7- and 9-y-old children were 108 ± 25% (n = 12) und 97 ± 15% (n = 12), respectively, of corresponding TEE values showing good agreement. However in the 12-, 15-, and 18-y-old subjects EI-WDR averaged 89 ± 12% (n = 12), 78±18% (n = 12), and 73 ± 25% (n = 10), respectively, of corresponding TEE values. The difference was ≥ 20% in 13 adolescents. Mean EI-DHs were 114 ± 19% (3 y), 111 ± 19% (5 y), 111 ± 23% (7 y), 106 ± 9% (9 y), 114 ± 17% (12 y), 101 ± 21% (15 y), and 98 ± 21% (18 y) of TEE estimates. Differences were significant in the 3-, 9-, and 12-y-old subjects. Results suggest that 7-d EI-WDRs tend to underestimate food intake of adolescents. Al-though EI-DHs were biased towards overestimation in most age groups and individual measurements lacked precision, EI-DHs were more representative of habitual intake than were EI-WDRs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-35
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume56
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Diet Records
diet history
Energy Intake
energy intake
Diet
energy expenditure
Energy Metabolism
food intake
Age Groups
Eating
history
Water

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Children
  • Diet history
  • Doubly labeled water
  • Energy expenditure
  • Energy intake
  • Weighed dietary record

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Food Science

Cite this

Livingstone, B., Prentice, A. M., Andrew Coward, W., Strain, J. J., Black, A. E., Davies, P. S. W., ... Whitehead, R. G. (1992). Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 56(1), 29-35.

Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents. / Livingstone, B.; Prentice, Andrew M.; Andrew Coward, W.; Strain, John J.; Black, Alison E.; Davies, Pater S W; Stewart, Clodagh M.; Gerald McKenna, P.; Whitehead, Roger G.

In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 56, No. 1, 1992, p. 29-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Livingstone, B, Prentice, AM, Andrew Coward, W, Strain, JJ, Black, AE, Davies, PSW, Stewart, CM, Gerald McKenna, P & Whitehead, RG 1992, 'Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents', American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 29-35.
Livingstone, B. ; Prentice, Andrew M. ; Andrew Coward, W. ; Strain, John J. ; Black, Alison E. ; Davies, Pater S W ; Stewart, Clodagh M. ; Gerald McKenna, P. ; Whitehead, Roger G. / Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents. In: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1992 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 29-35.
@article{9f3bd15d1f504adf80531b0449339737,
title = "Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents",
abstract = "Energy intakes assessed by 7-d weighed dietary records (EI-WDRs) and did histories (El-DHs) were compared with concurrent estimates of total energy expenditure (TEE) by the doubly labeled water method in 78 subjects aged 3-18 y. EI-WDRs were not obtained from the 3- and 5-y-old subjects. EI-WDRs in the 7- and 9-y-old children were 108 ± 25{\%} (n = 12) und 97 ± 15{\%} (n = 12), respectively, of corresponding TEE values showing good agreement. However in the 12-, 15-, and 18-y-old subjects EI-WDR averaged 89 ± 12{\%} (n = 12), 78±18{\%} (n = 12), and 73 ± 25{\%} (n = 10), respectively, of corresponding TEE values. The difference was ≥ 20{\%} in 13 adolescents. Mean EI-DHs were 114 ± 19{\%} (3 y), 111 ± 19{\%} (5 y), 111 ± 23{\%} (7 y), 106 ± 9{\%} (9 y), 114 ± 17{\%} (12 y), 101 ± 21{\%} (15 y), and 98 ± 21{\%} (18 y) of TEE estimates. Differences were significant in the 3-, 9-, and 12-y-old subjects. Results suggest that 7-d EI-WDRs tend to underestimate food intake of adolescents. Al-though EI-DHs were biased towards overestimation in most age groups and individual measurements lacked precision, EI-DHs were more representative of habitual intake than were EI-WDRs.",
keywords = "Adolescents, Children, Diet history, Doubly labeled water, Energy expenditure, Energy intake, Weighed dietary record",
author = "B. Livingstone and Prentice, {Andrew M.} and {Andrew Coward}, W. and Strain, {John J.} and Black, {Alison E.} and Davies, {Pater S W} and Stewart, {Clodagh M.} and {Gerald McKenna}, P. and Whitehead, {Roger G.}",
year = "1992",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "29--35",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0002-9165",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of estimates of energy intake by weighed dietary record and diet history in children and adolescents

AU - Livingstone, B.

AU - Prentice, Andrew M.

AU - Andrew Coward, W.

AU - Strain, John J.

AU - Black, Alison E.

AU - Davies, Pater S W

AU - Stewart, Clodagh M.

AU - Gerald McKenna, P.

AU - Whitehead, Roger G.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Energy intakes assessed by 7-d weighed dietary records (EI-WDRs) and did histories (El-DHs) were compared with concurrent estimates of total energy expenditure (TEE) by the doubly labeled water method in 78 subjects aged 3-18 y. EI-WDRs were not obtained from the 3- and 5-y-old subjects. EI-WDRs in the 7- and 9-y-old children were 108 ± 25% (n = 12) und 97 ± 15% (n = 12), respectively, of corresponding TEE values showing good agreement. However in the 12-, 15-, and 18-y-old subjects EI-WDR averaged 89 ± 12% (n = 12), 78±18% (n = 12), and 73 ± 25% (n = 10), respectively, of corresponding TEE values. The difference was ≥ 20% in 13 adolescents. Mean EI-DHs were 114 ± 19% (3 y), 111 ± 19% (5 y), 111 ± 23% (7 y), 106 ± 9% (9 y), 114 ± 17% (12 y), 101 ± 21% (15 y), and 98 ± 21% (18 y) of TEE estimates. Differences were significant in the 3-, 9-, and 12-y-old subjects. Results suggest that 7-d EI-WDRs tend to underestimate food intake of adolescents. Al-though EI-DHs were biased towards overestimation in most age groups and individual measurements lacked precision, EI-DHs were more representative of habitual intake than were EI-WDRs.

AB - Energy intakes assessed by 7-d weighed dietary records (EI-WDRs) and did histories (El-DHs) were compared with concurrent estimates of total energy expenditure (TEE) by the doubly labeled water method in 78 subjects aged 3-18 y. EI-WDRs were not obtained from the 3- and 5-y-old subjects. EI-WDRs in the 7- and 9-y-old children were 108 ± 25% (n = 12) und 97 ± 15% (n = 12), respectively, of corresponding TEE values showing good agreement. However in the 12-, 15-, and 18-y-old subjects EI-WDR averaged 89 ± 12% (n = 12), 78±18% (n = 12), and 73 ± 25% (n = 10), respectively, of corresponding TEE values. The difference was ≥ 20% in 13 adolescents. Mean EI-DHs were 114 ± 19% (3 y), 111 ± 19% (5 y), 111 ± 23% (7 y), 106 ± 9% (9 y), 114 ± 17% (12 y), 101 ± 21% (15 y), and 98 ± 21% (18 y) of TEE estimates. Differences were significant in the 3-, 9-, and 12-y-old subjects. Results suggest that 7-d EI-WDRs tend to underestimate food intake of adolescents. Al-though EI-DHs were biased towards overestimation in most age groups and individual measurements lacked precision, EI-DHs were more representative of habitual intake than were EI-WDRs.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Children

KW - Diet history

KW - Doubly labeled water

KW - Energy expenditure

KW - Energy intake

KW - Weighed dietary record

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026648009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026648009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1609757

AN - SCOPUS:0026648009

VL - 56

SP - 29

EP - 35

JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0002-9165

IS - 1

ER -