TransCom N2O model inter-comparison - Part 2

Atmospheric inversion estimates of N2O emissions

R. L. Thompson, K. Ishijima, E. Saikawa, M. Corazza, U. Karstens, P. K. Patra, P. Bergamaschi, F. Chevallier, E. Dlugokencky, R. G. Prinn, R. F. Weiss, S. O'Doherty, P. J. Fraser, L. P. Steele, P. B. Krummel, A. Vermeulen, Y. Tohjima, A. Jordan, L. Haszpra, M. Steinbacher & 6 others S. Van Der Laan, T. Aalto, F. Meinhardt, M. E. Popa, J. Moncrieff, P. Bousquet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines N2O emission estimates from five different atmospheric inversion frameworks based on chemistry transport models (CTMs). The five frameworks differ in the choice of CTM, meteorological data, prior uncertainties and inversion method but use the same prior emissions and observation data set. The posterior modelled atmospheric N2O mole fractions are compared to observations to assess the performance of the inversions and to help diagnose problems in the modelled transport. Additionally, the mean emissions for 2006 to 2008 are compared in terms of the spatial distribution and seasonality. Overall, there is a good agreement among the inversions for the mean global total emission, which ranges from 16.1 to 18.7 TgN yrĝ̂'1 and is consistent with previous estimates. Ocean emissions represent between 31 and 38% of the global total compared to widely varying previous estimates of 24 to 38%. Emissions from the northern mid- to high latitudes are likely to be more important, with a consistent shift in emissions from the tropics and subtropics to the mid- to high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere; the emission ratio for 0-30° N to 30-90° N ranges from 1.5 to 1.9 compared with 2.9 to 3.0 in previous estimates. The largest discrepancies across inversions are seen for the regions of South and East Asia and for tropical and South America owing to the poor observational constraint for these areas and to considerable differences in the modelled transport, especially inter-hemispheric exchange rates and tropical convective mixing. Estimates of the seasonal cycle in N2O emissions are also sensitive to errors in modelled stratosphere-to-troposphere transport in the tropics and southern extratropics. Overall, the results show a convergence in the global and regional emissions compared to previous independent studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6177-6194
Number of pages18
JournalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume14
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 23 2014

Fingerprint

atmospheric inversion
comparison
exchange rate
seasonality
stratosphere
troposphere
Northern Hemisphere
spatial distribution
inversion
ocean
tropics
South America
Asia
method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Thompson, R. L., Ishijima, K., Saikawa, E., Corazza, M., Karstens, U., Patra, P. K., ... Bousquet, P. (2014). TransCom N2O model inter-comparison - Part 2: Atmospheric inversion estimates of N2O emissions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(12), 6177-6194. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6177-2014

TransCom N2O model inter-comparison - Part 2 : Atmospheric inversion estimates of N2O emissions. / Thompson, R. L.; Ishijima, K.; Saikawa, E.; Corazza, M.; Karstens, U.; Patra, P. K.; Bergamaschi, P.; Chevallier, F.; Dlugokencky, E.; Prinn, R. G.; Weiss, R. F.; O'Doherty, S.; Fraser, P. J.; Steele, L. P.; Krummel, P. B.; Vermeulen, A.; Tohjima, Y.; Jordan, A.; Haszpra, L.; Steinbacher, M.; Van Der Laan, S.; Aalto, T.; Meinhardt, F.; Popa, M. E.; Moncrieff, J.; Bousquet, P.

In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, No. 12, 23.06.2014, p. 6177-6194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thompson, RL, Ishijima, K, Saikawa, E, Corazza, M, Karstens, U, Patra, PK, Bergamaschi, P, Chevallier, F, Dlugokencky, E, Prinn, RG, Weiss, RF, O'Doherty, S, Fraser, PJ, Steele, LP, Krummel, PB, Vermeulen, A, Tohjima, Y, Jordan, A, Haszpra, L, Steinbacher, M, Van Der Laan, S, Aalto, T, Meinhardt, F, Popa, ME, Moncrieff, J & Bousquet, P 2014, 'TransCom N2O model inter-comparison - Part 2: Atmospheric inversion estimates of N2O emissions', Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 6177-6194. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6177-2014
Thompson, R. L. ; Ishijima, K. ; Saikawa, E. ; Corazza, M. ; Karstens, U. ; Patra, P. K. ; Bergamaschi, P. ; Chevallier, F. ; Dlugokencky, E. ; Prinn, R. G. ; Weiss, R. F. ; O'Doherty, S. ; Fraser, P. J. ; Steele, L. P. ; Krummel, P. B. ; Vermeulen, A. ; Tohjima, Y. ; Jordan, A. ; Haszpra, L. ; Steinbacher, M. ; Van Der Laan, S. ; Aalto, T. ; Meinhardt, F. ; Popa, M. E. ; Moncrieff, J. ; Bousquet, P. / TransCom N2O model inter-comparison - Part 2 : Atmospheric inversion estimates of N2O emissions. In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 12. pp. 6177-6194.
@article{428fabe673ea434bb668fd820a351c6e,
title = "TransCom N2O model inter-comparison - Part 2: Atmospheric inversion estimates of N2O emissions",
abstract = "This study examines N2O emission estimates from five different atmospheric inversion frameworks based on chemistry transport models (CTMs). The five frameworks differ in the choice of CTM, meteorological data, prior uncertainties and inversion method but use the same prior emissions and observation data set. The posterior modelled atmospheric N2O mole fractions are compared to observations to assess the performance of the inversions and to help diagnose problems in the modelled transport. Additionally, the mean emissions for 2006 to 2008 are compared in terms of the spatial distribution and seasonality. Overall, there is a good agreement among the inversions for the mean global total emission, which ranges from 16.1 to 18.7 TgN yrĝ̂'1 and is consistent with previous estimates. Ocean emissions represent between 31 and 38{\%} of the global total compared to widely varying previous estimates of 24 to 38{\%}. Emissions from the northern mid- to high latitudes are likely to be more important, with a consistent shift in emissions from the tropics and subtropics to the mid- to high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere; the emission ratio for 0-30° N to 30-90° N ranges from 1.5 to 1.9 compared with 2.9 to 3.0 in previous estimates. The largest discrepancies across inversions are seen for the regions of South and East Asia and for tropical and South America owing to the poor observational constraint for these areas and to considerable differences in the modelled transport, especially inter-hemispheric exchange rates and tropical convective mixing. Estimates of the seasonal cycle in N2O emissions are also sensitive to errors in modelled stratosphere-to-troposphere transport in the tropics and southern extratropics. Overall, the results show a convergence in the global and regional emissions compared to previous independent studies.",
author = "Thompson, {R. L.} and K. Ishijima and E. Saikawa and M. Corazza and U. Karstens and Patra, {P. K.} and P. Bergamaschi and F. Chevallier and E. Dlugokencky and Prinn, {R. G.} and Weiss, {R. F.} and S. O'Doherty and Fraser, {P. J.} and Steele, {L. P.} and Krummel, {P. B.} and A. Vermeulen and Y. Tohjima and A. Jordan and L. Haszpra and M. Steinbacher and {Van Der Laan}, S. and T. Aalto and F. Meinhardt and Popa, {M. E.} and J. Moncrieff and P. Bousquet",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "23",
doi = "10.5194/acp-14-6177-2014",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "6177--6194",
journal = "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics",
issn = "1680-7316",
publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TransCom N2O model inter-comparison - Part 2

T2 - Atmospheric inversion estimates of N2O emissions

AU - Thompson, R. L.

AU - Ishijima, K.

AU - Saikawa, E.

AU - Corazza, M.

AU - Karstens, U.

AU - Patra, P. K.

AU - Bergamaschi, P.

AU - Chevallier, F.

AU - Dlugokencky, E.

AU - Prinn, R. G.

AU - Weiss, R. F.

AU - O'Doherty, S.

AU - Fraser, P. J.

AU - Steele, L. P.

AU - Krummel, P. B.

AU - Vermeulen, A.

AU - Tohjima, Y.

AU - Jordan, A.

AU - Haszpra, L.

AU - Steinbacher, M.

AU - Van Der Laan, S.

AU - Aalto, T.

AU - Meinhardt, F.

AU - Popa, M. E.

AU - Moncrieff, J.

AU - Bousquet, P.

PY - 2014/6/23

Y1 - 2014/6/23

N2 - This study examines N2O emission estimates from five different atmospheric inversion frameworks based on chemistry transport models (CTMs). The five frameworks differ in the choice of CTM, meteorological data, prior uncertainties and inversion method but use the same prior emissions and observation data set. The posterior modelled atmospheric N2O mole fractions are compared to observations to assess the performance of the inversions and to help diagnose problems in the modelled transport. Additionally, the mean emissions for 2006 to 2008 are compared in terms of the spatial distribution and seasonality. Overall, there is a good agreement among the inversions for the mean global total emission, which ranges from 16.1 to 18.7 TgN yrĝ̂'1 and is consistent with previous estimates. Ocean emissions represent between 31 and 38% of the global total compared to widely varying previous estimates of 24 to 38%. Emissions from the northern mid- to high latitudes are likely to be more important, with a consistent shift in emissions from the tropics and subtropics to the mid- to high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere; the emission ratio for 0-30° N to 30-90° N ranges from 1.5 to 1.9 compared with 2.9 to 3.0 in previous estimates. The largest discrepancies across inversions are seen for the regions of South and East Asia and for tropical and South America owing to the poor observational constraint for these areas and to considerable differences in the modelled transport, especially inter-hemispheric exchange rates and tropical convective mixing. Estimates of the seasonal cycle in N2O emissions are also sensitive to errors in modelled stratosphere-to-troposphere transport in the tropics and southern extratropics. Overall, the results show a convergence in the global and regional emissions compared to previous independent studies.

AB - This study examines N2O emission estimates from five different atmospheric inversion frameworks based on chemistry transport models (CTMs). The five frameworks differ in the choice of CTM, meteorological data, prior uncertainties and inversion method but use the same prior emissions and observation data set. The posterior modelled atmospheric N2O mole fractions are compared to observations to assess the performance of the inversions and to help diagnose problems in the modelled transport. Additionally, the mean emissions for 2006 to 2008 are compared in terms of the spatial distribution and seasonality. Overall, there is a good agreement among the inversions for the mean global total emission, which ranges from 16.1 to 18.7 TgN yrĝ̂'1 and is consistent with previous estimates. Ocean emissions represent between 31 and 38% of the global total compared to widely varying previous estimates of 24 to 38%. Emissions from the northern mid- to high latitudes are likely to be more important, with a consistent shift in emissions from the tropics and subtropics to the mid- to high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere; the emission ratio for 0-30° N to 30-90° N ranges from 1.5 to 1.9 compared with 2.9 to 3.0 in previous estimates. The largest discrepancies across inversions are seen for the regions of South and East Asia and for tropical and South America owing to the poor observational constraint for these areas and to considerable differences in the modelled transport, especially inter-hemispheric exchange rates and tropical convective mixing. Estimates of the seasonal cycle in N2O emissions are also sensitive to errors in modelled stratosphere-to-troposphere transport in the tropics and southern extratropics. Overall, the results show a convergence in the global and regional emissions compared to previous independent studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902978776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902978776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/acp-14-6177-2014

DO - 10.5194/acp-14-6177-2014

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 6177

EP - 6194

JO - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

JF - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

SN - 1680-7316

IS - 12

ER -