Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper gives an overview of the diachronous (prospective) and synchronous (retrospective) approach to ageing studies of scientific literature from the perspective of technical reliability, visualising the different aspects that can be analysed by the two approaches. The main objective is to deepen the understanding of the mechanism and the theory underlying the two aproaches, and is to show that the difference between the diachronous and synchronous model is not just counting into opposite directions. In this context, a stochastic model is presented showing that one and the same model can be used to describe both diachronous and synchronous perspectives of citation processes. On the basis of this model, it is explained how some diachronous and synchronous citation-based indicators can be re-calculated for changing publication periods and citation windows underlying their construction. The paper is concluded by several applications such as the definition and calculation of diachronous (prospective) and synchronous (retrospective) journal impact measures and other citation indicators used in research evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-522
Number of pages12
JournalScientometrics
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Stochastic models
evaluation research
technical literature
Aging of materials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses. / Glänzel, W.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 60, No. 3, 2004, p. 511-522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a861cf80b924f02a106ede3e53b7591,
title = "Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses",
abstract = "This paper gives an overview of the diachronous (prospective) and synchronous (retrospective) approach to ageing studies of scientific literature from the perspective of technical reliability, visualising the different aspects that can be analysed by the two approaches. The main objective is to deepen the understanding of the mechanism and the theory underlying the two aproaches, and is to show that the difference between the diachronous and synchronous model is not just counting into opposite directions. In this context, a stochastic model is presented showing that one and the same model can be used to describe both diachronous and synchronous perspectives of citation processes. On the basis of this model, it is explained how some diachronous and synchronous citation-based indicators can be re-calculated for changing publication periods and citation windows underlying their construction. The paper is concluded by several applications such as the definition and calculation of diachronous (prospective) and synchronous (retrospective) journal impact measures and other citation indicators used in research evaluation.",
author = "W. Gl{\"a}nzel",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034391.06240.2a",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "511--522",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses

AU - Glänzel, W.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This paper gives an overview of the diachronous (prospective) and synchronous (retrospective) approach to ageing studies of scientific literature from the perspective of technical reliability, visualising the different aspects that can be analysed by the two approaches. The main objective is to deepen the understanding of the mechanism and the theory underlying the two aproaches, and is to show that the difference between the diachronous and synchronous model is not just counting into opposite directions. In this context, a stochastic model is presented showing that one and the same model can be used to describe both diachronous and synchronous perspectives of citation processes. On the basis of this model, it is explained how some diachronous and synchronous citation-based indicators can be re-calculated for changing publication periods and citation windows underlying their construction. The paper is concluded by several applications such as the definition and calculation of diachronous (prospective) and synchronous (retrospective) journal impact measures and other citation indicators used in research evaluation.

AB - This paper gives an overview of the diachronous (prospective) and synchronous (retrospective) approach to ageing studies of scientific literature from the perspective of technical reliability, visualising the different aspects that can be analysed by the two approaches. The main objective is to deepen the understanding of the mechanism and the theory underlying the two aproaches, and is to show that the difference between the diachronous and synchronous model is not just counting into opposite directions. In this context, a stochastic model is presented showing that one and the same model can be used to describe both diachronous and synchronous perspectives of citation processes. On the basis of this model, it is explained how some diachronous and synchronous citation-based indicators can be re-calculated for changing publication periods and citation windows underlying their construction. The paper is concluded by several applications such as the definition and calculation of diachronous (prospective) and synchronous (retrospective) journal impact measures and other citation indicators used in research evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142750703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142750703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034391.06240.2a

DO - 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034391.06240.2a

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 511

EP - 522

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 3

ER -