Thrombolysis is superior to heparin for non-obstructive mitral mechanical valve thrombosis

M. Lengyel, Gizella Vegh, Laszlo Vandor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aim of the study: Non-obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a unique subset that features clinical presentation without heart failure, and may be asymptomatic. Thrombolysis has been accepted for obstructive PVT, but treatment strategies of non-obstructive PVT are controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis and heparin treatment in these patients. Methods: Between 1993 and 1998, 20 consecutive patients were found by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to have non-obstructive PVT. TEE was performed for peripheral embolism in two patients, stroke or transient ischemic attack in six; stroke and fever in two, fever in one patient, as a routine postoperative examination in two patients, and for other reasons in seven. Patients were allocated to two groups: group I (n = 8) received streptokinase-mediated fibrinolysis; group II (n = 12) received intravenous heparin by infusion. Treatment was monitored using TEE. Results: There was no difference between patient groups with regard to sex, age, type of prosthesis and time since operation, though anticoagulant status was more often inadequate in group II. By TEE, valve motion was normal in all patients. In group I, all thrombi were mobile and 5-13 mm in diameter; in group II, all thrombi but three were mobile and 3-18 mm in diameter. In group I, thrombolysis was successful in all patients, without complications, within 6- 72 h. In group II, heparin treatment was successful in six patients in 3-32 days. In one patient, seven day's of unsuccessful heparin was followed by two months' successful coumarin therapy. Among five unsuccessful cases, the thrombus size increased in four (three became obstructive in 7-35 days); all four patients were switched to fibrinolysis, which was successful without complications in 12-60 h. The fifth patient developed a stroke after nine days of heparin treatment and was subsequently operated on. Conclusions: Non- obstructive PVT may be asymptomatic in one-third of patients. Thrombolysis is an efficient and safe treatment, and may be first-line therapy if there is no contraindication. Heparin treatment was successful in about one-half of our cases in the presence of sessile or small thrombi and inadequate anticoagulant status. In unsuccessful cases, thrombi became obstructive or caused stroke during heparin therapy, the adequate duration of which remains unclear.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-173
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Heart Valve Disease
Volume8
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Fingerprint

Mitral Valve
Heparin
Thrombosis
Transesophageal Echocardiography
Stroke
Therapeutics
Fibrinolysis
Anticoagulants
Fever
Streptokinase
Transient Ischemic Attack
Embolism
Intravenous Infusions
Prostheses and Implants
Heart Failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Thrombolysis is superior to heparin for non-obstructive mitral mechanical valve thrombosis. / Lengyel, M.; Vegh, Gizella; Vandor, Laszlo.

In: Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1999, p. 167-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7eec0d07755e42e386ec6250f8d9af3e,
title = "Thrombolysis is superior to heparin for non-obstructive mitral mechanical valve thrombosis",
abstract = "Background and aim of the study: Non-obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a unique subset that features clinical presentation without heart failure, and may be asymptomatic. Thrombolysis has been accepted for obstructive PVT, but treatment strategies of non-obstructive PVT are controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis and heparin treatment in these patients. Methods: Between 1993 and 1998, 20 consecutive patients were found by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to have non-obstructive PVT. TEE was performed for peripheral embolism in two patients, stroke or transient ischemic attack in six; stroke and fever in two, fever in one patient, as a routine postoperative examination in two patients, and for other reasons in seven. Patients were allocated to two groups: group I (n = 8) received streptokinase-mediated fibrinolysis; group II (n = 12) received intravenous heparin by infusion. Treatment was monitored using TEE. Results: There was no difference between patient groups with regard to sex, age, type of prosthesis and time since operation, though anticoagulant status was more often inadequate in group II. By TEE, valve motion was normal in all patients. In group I, all thrombi were mobile and 5-13 mm in diameter; in group II, all thrombi but three were mobile and 3-18 mm in diameter. In group I, thrombolysis was successful in all patients, without complications, within 6- 72 h. In group II, heparin treatment was successful in six patients in 3-32 days. In one patient, seven day's of unsuccessful heparin was followed by two months' successful coumarin therapy. Among five unsuccessful cases, the thrombus size increased in four (three became obstructive in 7-35 days); all four patients were switched to fibrinolysis, which was successful without complications in 12-60 h. The fifth patient developed a stroke after nine days of heparin treatment and was subsequently operated on. Conclusions: Non- obstructive PVT may be asymptomatic in one-third of patients. Thrombolysis is an efficient and safe treatment, and may be first-line therapy if there is no contraindication. Heparin treatment was successful in about one-half of our cases in the presence of sessile or small thrombi and inadequate anticoagulant status. In unsuccessful cases, thrombi became obstructive or caused stroke during heparin therapy, the adequate duration of which remains unclear.",
author = "M. Lengyel and Gizella Vegh and Laszlo Vandor",
year = "1999",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "167--173",
journal = "Journal of Heart Valve Disease",
issn = "0966-8519",
publisher = "ICR Publishers Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thrombolysis is superior to heparin for non-obstructive mitral mechanical valve thrombosis

AU - Lengyel, M.

AU - Vegh, Gizella

AU - Vandor, Laszlo

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Background and aim of the study: Non-obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a unique subset that features clinical presentation without heart failure, and may be asymptomatic. Thrombolysis has been accepted for obstructive PVT, but treatment strategies of non-obstructive PVT are controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis and heparin treatment in these patients. Methods: Between 1993 and 1998, 20 consecutive patients were found by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to have non-obstructive PVT. TEE was performed for peripheral embolism in two patients, stroke or transient ischemic attack in six; stroke and fever in two, fever in one patient, as a routine postoperative examination in two patients, and for other reasons in seven. Patients were allocated to two groups: group I (n = 8) received streptokinase-mediated fibrinolysis; group II (n = 12) received intravenous heparin by infusion. Treatment was monitored using TEE. Results: There was no difference between patient groups with regard to sex, age, type of prosthesis and time since operation, though anticoagulant status was more often inadequate in group II. By TEE, valve motion was normal in all patients. In group I, all thrombi were mobile and 5-13 mm in diameter; in group II, all thrombi but three were mobile and 3-18 mm in diameter. In group I, thrombolysis was successful in all patients, without complications, within 6- 72 h. In group II, heparin treatment was successful in six patients in 3-32 days. In one patient, seven day's of unsuccessful heparin was followed by two months' successful coumarin therapy. Among five unsuccessful cases, the thrombus size increased in four (three became obstructive in 7-35 days); all four patients were switched to fibrinolysis, which was successful without complications in 12-60 h. The fifth patient developed a stroke after nine days of heparin treatment and was subsequently operated on. Conclusions: Non- obstructive PVT may be asymptomatic in one-third of patients. Thrombolysis is an efficient and safe treatment, and may be first-line therapy if there is no contraindication. Heparin treatment was successful in about one-half of our cases in the presence of sessile or small thrombi and inadequate anticoagulant status. In unsuccessful cases, thrombi became obstructive or caused stroke during heparin therapy, the adequate duration of which remains unclear.

AB - Background and aim of the study: Non-obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a unique subset that features clinical presentation without heart failure, and may be asymptomatic. Thrombolysis has been accepted for obstructive PVT, but treatment strategies of non-obstructive PVT are controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis and heparin treatment in these patients. Methods: Between 1993 and 1998, 20 consecutive patients were found by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to have non-obstructive PVT. TEE was performed for peripheral embolism in two patients, stroke or transient ischemic attack in six; stroke and fever in two, fever in one patient, as a routine postoperative examination in two patients, and for other reasons in seven. Patients were allocated to two groups: group I (n = 8) received streptokinase-mediated fibrinolysis; group II (n = 12) received intravenous heparin by infusion. Treatment was monitored using TEE. Results: There was no difference between patient groups with regard to sex, age, type of prosthesis and time since operation, though anticoagulant status was more often inadequate in group II. By TEE, valve motion was normal in all patients. In group I, all thrombi were mobile and 5-13 mm in diameter; in group II, all thrombi but three were mobile and 3-18 mm in diameter. In group I, thrombolysis was successful in all patients, without complications, within 6- 72 h. In group II, heparin treatment was successful in six patients in 3-32 days. In one patient, seven day's of unsuccessful heparin was followed by two months' successful coumarin therapy. Among five unsuccessful cases, the thrombus size increased in four (three became obstructive in 7-35 days); all four patients were switched to fibrinolysis, which was successful without complications in 12-60 h. The fifth patient developed a stroke after nine days of heparin treatment and was subsequently operated on. Conclusions: Non- obstructive PVT may be asymptomatic in one-third of patients. Thrombolysis is an efficient and safe treatment, and may be first-line therapy if there is no contraindication. Heparin treatment was successful in about one-half of our cases in the presence of sessile or small thrombi and inadequate anticoagulant status. In unsuccessful cases, thrombi became obstructive or caused stroke during heparin therapy, the adequate duration of which remains unclear.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032895091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032895091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 167

EP - 173

JO - Journal of Heart Valve Disease

JF - Journal of Heart Valve Disease

SN - 0966-8519

IS - 2

ER -