The impact of the left ventricular pacing polarity and localization during cardiac resynchronization therapy on depolarization and repolarization parameters

Emin Evren Özcan, Ali Öztürk, Erdem Özel, Ömer Senarslan, B. Merkely, L. Gellér

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Reversal of myocardial activation sequence during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may increase the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR), which may lead to ventricular arrhythmias. Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads offer 10 different pacing configurations. However, little is known about the role of pacing polarity on repolarization patterns. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of LV pacing polarity on depolarization and repolarization parameters in the same substrate in the same patient group. Methods: This study prospectively analyzed 20 patients who were consecutively admitted and underwent CRT-D implantation with quadripolar LV leads. Two bipolar pacing vectors and two unipolar vectors, also called extended bipolar pacing vectors, from the same pacing sites were selected for comparison. Electrocardiogram markers of depolarization and repolarization were measured and compared. Results: Bipolar LV pacing was associated with a significantly shorter QRS duration (basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 135.1±17.8 vs. 119.3±14.5, p<0.01; non-basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 134.4±15.7 vs. 121.9±10.3, p<0.01) and Tp-Te value (Basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 119.1±36.7 vs. 97.6±27.9, p<0.05; non-basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 117.9±36.3 vs. 98.6±20.4, p<0.05) than those in unipolar pacing. LV pacing from basal and non-basal segments had no differential effect on the repolarization parameters. Conclusion: The LV pacing polarity significantly affects QRS duration but not repolarization patterns regardless of the pacing site in the same substrate. From the perspective of basal and non-basal segments, the LV pacing site has no differential effect on the repolarization parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-242
Number of pages6
JournalAnatolian journal of cardiology
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Electrocardiography

Keywords

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Pacing polarity
  • Quadripolar lead
  • Transmural dispersion of repolarization
  • Ventricular arrhythmias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

The impact of the left ventricular pacing polarity and localization during cardiac resynchronization therapy on depolarization and repolarization parameters. / Özcan, Emin Evren; Öztürk, Ali; Özel, Erdem; Senarslan, Ömer; Merkely, B.; Gellér, L.

In: Anatolian journal of cardiology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 237-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15ef910b5ba943e2bd0a60a062571e8b,
title = "The impact of the left ventricular pacing polarity and localization during cardiac resynchronization therapy on depolarization and repolarization parameters",
abstract = "Objective: Reversal of myocardial activation sequence during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may increase the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR), which may lead to ventricular arrhythmias. Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads offer 10 different pacing configurations. However, little is known about the role of pacing polarity on repolarization patterns. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of LV pacing polarity on depolarization and repolarization parameters in the same substrate in the same patient group. Methods: This study prospectively analyzed 20 patients who were consecutively admitted and underwent CRT-D implantation with quadripolar LV leads. Two bipolar pacing vectors and two unipolar vectors, also called extended bipolar pacing vectors, from the same pacing sites were selected for comparison. Electrocardiogram markers of depolarization and repolarization were measured and compared. Results: Bipolar LV pacing was associated with a significantly shorter QRS duration (basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 135.1±17.8 vs. 119.3±14.5, p<0.01; non-basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 134.4±15.7 vs. 121.9±10.3, p<0.01) and Tp-Te value (Basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 119.1±36.7 vs. 97.6±27.9, p<0.05; non-basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 117.9±36.3 vs. 98.6±20.4, p<0.05) than those in unipolar pacing. LV pacing from basal and non-basal segments had no differential effect on the repolarization parameters. Conclusion: The LV pacing polarity significantly affects QRS duration but not repolarization patterns regardless of the pacing site in the same substrate. From the perspective of basal and non-basal segments, the LV pacing site has no differential effect on the repolarization parameters.",
keywords = "Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Pacing polarity, Quadripolar lead, Transmural dispersion of repolarization, Ventricular arrhythmias",
author = "{\"O}zcan, {Emin Evren} and Ali {\"O}zt{\"u}rk and Erdem {\"O}zel and {\"O}mer Senarslan and B. Merkely and L. Gell{\'e}r",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.62357",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "237--242",
journal = "Anatolian journal of cardiology",
issn = "2149-2263",
publisher = "Aves",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of the left ventricular pacing polarity and localization during cardiac resynchronization therapy on depolarization and repolarization parameters

AU - Özcan, Emin Evren

AU - Öztürk, Ali

AU - Özel, Erdem

AU - Senarslan, Ömer

AU - Merkely, B.

AU - Gellér, L.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Objective: Reversal of myocardial activation sequence during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may increase the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR), which may lead to ventricular arrhythmias. Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads offer 10 different pacing configurations. However, little is known about the role of pacing polarity on repolarization patterns. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of LV pacing polarity on depolarization and repolarization parameters in the same substrate in the same patient group. Methods: This study prospectively analyzed 20 patients who were consecutively admitted and underwent CRT-D implantation with quadripolar LV leads. Two bipolar pacing vectors and two unipolar vectors, also called extended bipolar pacing vectors, from the same pacing sites were selected for comparison. Electrocardiogram markers of depolarization and repolarization were measured and compared. Results: Bipolar LV pacing was associated with a significantly shorter QRS duration (basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 135.1±17.8 vs. 119.3±14.5, p<0.01; non-basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 134.4±15.7 vs. 121.9±10.3, p<0.01) and Tp-Te value (Basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 119.1±36.7 vs. 97.6±27.9, p<0.05; non-basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 117.9±36.3 vs. 98.6±20.4, p<0.05) than those in unipolar pacing. LV pacing from basal and non-basal segments had no differential effect on the repolarization parameters. Conclusion: The LV pacing polarity significantly affects QRS duration but not repolarization patterns regardless of the pacing site in the same substrate. From the perspective of basal and non-basal segments, the LV pacing site has no differential effect on the repolarization parameters.

AB - Objective: Reversal of myocardial activation sequence during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may increase the transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR), which may lead to ventricular arrhythmias. Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads offer 10 different pacing configurations. However, little is known about the role of pacing polarity on repolarization patterns. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of LV pacing polarity on depolarization and repolarization parameters in the same substrate in the same patient group. Methods: This study prospectively analyzed 20 patients who were consecutively admitted and underwent CRT-D implantation with quadripolar LV leads. Two bipolar pacing vectors and two unipolar vectors, also called extended bipolar pacing vectors, from the same pacing sites were selected for comparison. Electrocardiogram markers of depolarization and repolarization were measured and compared. Results: Bipolar LV pacing was associated with a significantly shorter QRS duration (basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 135.1±17.8 vs. 119.3±14.5, p<0.01; non-basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 134.4±15.7 vs. 121.9±10.3, p<0.01) and Tp-Te value (Basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 119.1±36.7 vs. 97.6±27.9, p<0.05; non-basal, unipolar vs. bipolar, 117.9±36.3 vs. 98.6±20.4, p<0.05) than those in unipolar pacing. LV pacing from basal and non-basal segments had no differential effect on the repolarization parameters. Conclusion: The LV pacing polarity significantly affects QRS duration but not repolarization patterns regardless of the pacing site in the same substrate. From the perspective of basal and non-basal segments, the LV pacing site has no differential effect on the repolarization parameters.

KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy

KW - Pacing polarity

KW - Quadripolar lead

KW - Transmural dispersion of repolarization

KW - Ventricular arrhythmias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045006662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045006662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.62357

DO - 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.62357

M3 - Article

C2 - 29578202

AN - SCOPUS:85045006662

VL - 19

SP - 237

EP - 242

JO - Anatolian journal of cardiology

JF - Anatolian journal of cardiology

SN - 2149-2263

IS - 4

ER -