The evolution of imitation

What do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation?

Ludwig Huber, Friederike Range, Bernhard Voelkl, Andrea Szucsich, Zsófia Virányi, A. Miklósi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we review reports and present new empirical data from studies with marmosets and dogs that address the correspondence problem of imitation research. We focus on the question of how it is possible to transform visual information into matching motor acts. Here, the important issue is not the learning of a complex skill, but determining the copying fidelity of animals at different levels of behavioural organization. As a theoretical framework, we suggest a classification in terms of movement, action and result, which shows a positive relationship between the organizational level of imitation and matching degree. While the monkey studies have provided evidence of very precise copying of movements and, to a lesser degree, of behaviours, the dog studies have provided evidence of action copying and the reproduction of results. In a Do-as-I-do study, a dog attempted to reproduce the results of demonstrated object manipulations at the expense of movement details. Transitive actions were more easily replicated than intransitive ones, and familiarity of actions had a major influence. The discussion of these findings addresses the question of the neuronal mechanisms underlying imitation and whether a single mechanism is sufficient to explain the different levels of copying fidelity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2299-2309
Number of pages11
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume364
Issue number1528
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 27 2009

Fingerprint

imitation
Copying
Animals
Dogs
dogs
animal
Callithrix
animals
familiarity
Callitrichidae
Haplorhini
monkeys
Reproduction
transform
learning
Learning
taxonomy
Research
dog

Keywords

  • Do-as-I-do paradigm
  • Dogs
  • Intransitive action
  • Marmosets
  • Mirror neurons
  • Movement imitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

The evolution of imitation : What do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation? / Huber, Ludwig; Range, Friederike; Voelkl, Bernhard; Szucsich, Andrea; Virányi, Zsófia; Miklósi, A.

In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 364, No. 1528, 27.08.2009, p. 2299-2309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huber, Ludwig ; Range, Friederike ; Voelkl, Bernhard ; Szucsich, Andrea ; Virányi, Zsófia ; Miklósi, A. / The evolution of imitation : What do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation?. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009 ; Vol. 364, No. 1528. pp. 2299-2309.
@article{cde0ead316464204951c726a35804077,
title = "The evolution of imitation: What do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation?",
abstract = "In this paper, we review reports and present new empirical data from studies with marmosets and dogs that address the correspondence problem of imitation research. We focus on the question of how it is possible to transform visual information into matching motor acts. Here, the important issue is not the learning of a complex skill, but determining the copying fidelity of animals at different levels of behavioural organization. As a theoretical framework, we suggest a classification in terms of movement, action and result, which shows a positive relationship between the organizational level of imitation and matching degree. While the monkey studies have provided evidence of very precise copying of movements and, to a lesser degree, of behaviours, the dog studies have provided evidence of action copying and the reproduction of results. In a Do-as-I-do study, a dog attempted to reproduce the results of demonstrated object manipulations at the expense of movement details. Transitive actions were more easily replicated than intransitive ones, and familiarity of actions had a major influence. The discussion of these findings addresses the question of the neuronal mechanisms underlying imitation and whether a single mechanism is sufficient to explain the different levels of copying fidelity.",
keywords = "Do-as-I-do paradigm, Dogs, Intransitive action, Marmosets, Mirror neurons, Movement imitation",
author = "Ludwig Huber and Friederike Range and Bernhard Voelkl and Andrea Szucsich and Zs{\'o}fia Vir{\'a}nyi and A. Mikl{\'o}si",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1098/rstb.2009.0060",
language = "English",
volume = "364",
pages = "2299--2309",
journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1528",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolution of imitation

T2 - What do the capacities of non-human animals tell us about the mechanisms of imitation?

AU - Huber, Ludwig

AU - Range, Friederike

AU - Voelkl, Bernhard

AU - Szucsich, Andrea

AU - Virányi, Zsófia

AU - Miklósi, A.

PY - 2009/8/27

Y1 - 2009/8/27

N2 - In this paper, we review reports and present new empirical data from studies with marmosets and dogs that address the correspondence problem of imitation research. We focus on the question of how it is possible to transform visual information into matching motor acts. Here, the important issue is not the learning of a complex skill, but determining the copying fidelity of animals at different levels of behavioural organization. As a theoretical framework, we suggest a classification in terms of movement, action and result, which shows a positive relationship between the organizational level of imitation and matching degree. While the monkey studies have provided evidence of very precise copying of movements and, to a lesser degree, of behaviours, the dog studies have provided evidence of action copying and the reproduction of results. In a Do-as-I-do study, a dog attempted to reproduce the results of demonstrated object manipulations at the expense of movement details. Transitive actions were more easily replicated than intransitive ones, and familiarity of actions had a major influence. The discussion of these findings addresses the question of the neuronal mechanisms underlying imitation and whether a single mechanism is sufficient to explain the different levels of copying fidelity.

AB - In this paper, we review reports and present new empirical data from studies with marmosets and dogs that address the correspondence problem of imitation research. We focus on the question of how it is possible to transform visual information into matching motor acts. Here, the important issue is not the learning of a complex skill, but determining the copying fidelity of animals at different levels of behavioural organization. As a theoretical framework, we suggest a classification in terms of movement, action and result, which shows a positive relationship between the organizational level of imitation and matching degree. While the monkey studies have provided evidence of very precise copying of movements and, to a lesser degree, of behaviours, the dog studies have provided evidence of action copying and the reproduction of results. In a Do-as-I-do study, a dog attempted to reproduce the results of demonstrated object manipulations at the expense of movement details. Transitive actions were more easily replicated than intransitive ones, and familiarity of actions had a major influence. The discussion of these findings addresses the question of the neuronal mechanisms underlying imitation and whether a single mechanism is sufficient to explain the different levels of copying fidelity.

KW - Do-as-I-do paradigm

KW - Dogs

KW - Intransitive action

KW - Marmosets

KW - Mirror neurons

KW - Movement imitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68549125104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68549125104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2009.0060

DO - 10.1098/rstb.2009.0060

M3 - Article

VL - 364

SP - 2299

EP - 2309

JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1528

ER -