The effect of energy reserves and food availability on optimal immune defence

Alasdair I. Houston, John M. McNamara, Z. Barta, Kirk C. Klasing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to avoid both starvation and disease, animals must allocate resources between energy reserves and immune defence. We investigate the optimal allocation. We find that animals with low reserves choose to allocate less to defence than animals with higher reserves because when reserves are low it is more important to increase reserves to reduce the risk of starvation in the future. In general, investment in immune defence increases monotonically with energy reserves. An exception is when the animal can reduce its probability of death from disease by reducing its foraging rate. In this case, allocation to immune defence can peak at intermediate reserves. When food changes over time, the optimal response depends on the frequency of changes. If the environment is relatively stable, animals forage most intensively when the food is scarce and invest more in immune defence when the food is abundant than when it is scarce. If the environment changes quickly, animals forage at low intensity when the food is scarce, but at high intensity when the food is abundant. As the rate of environmental change increases, immune defence becomes less dependent on food availability. We show that the strength of selection on reserve-dependent immune defence depends on how foraging intensity and immune defence determine the probability of death from disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2835-2842
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume274
Issue number1627
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 22 2007

Fingerprint

food availability
Animals
Availability
Food
energy
animals
food
animal
starvation
Starvation
food defense
foraging
forage
death
animal diseases
Animal Diseases
Energy resources
effect
defence
energy resource

Keywords

  • Dynamic programming
  • Energy reserves
  • Immunity
  • State-dependence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The effect of energy reserves and food availability on optimal immune defence. / Houston, Alasdair I.; McNamara, John M.; Barta, Z.; Klasing, Kirk C.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 274, No. 1627, 22.11.2007, p. 2835-2842.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Houston, Alasdair I. ; McNamara, John M. ; Barta, Z. ; Klasing, Kirk C. / The effect of energy reserves and food availability on optimal immune defence. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2007 ; Vol. 274, No. 1627. pp. 2835-2842.
@article{e453e93304294c9b94ce244379900395,
title = "The effect of energy reserves and food availability on optimal immune defence",
abstract = "In order to avoid both starvation and disease, animals must allocate resources between energy reserves and immune defence. We investigate the optimal allocation. We find that animals with low reserves choose to allocate less to defence than animals with higher reserves because when reserves are low it is more important to increase reserves to reduce the risk of starvation in the future. In general, investment in immune defence increases monotonically with energy reserves. An exception is when the animal can reduce its probability of death from disease by reducing its foraging rate. In this case, allocation to immune defence can peak at intermediate reserves. When food changes over time, the optimal response depends on the frequency of changes. If the environment is relatively stable, animals forage most intensively when the food is scarce and invest more in immune defence when the food is abundant than when it is scarce. If the environment changes quickly, animals forage at low intensity when the food is scarce, but at high intensity when the food is abundant. As the rate of environmental change increases, immune defence becomes less dependent on food availability. We show that the strength of selection on reserve-dependent immune defence depends on how foraging intensity and immune defence determine the probability of death from disease.",
keywords = "Dynamic programming, Energy reserves, Immunity, State-dependence",
author = "Houston, {Alasdair I.} and McNamara, {John M.} and Z. Barta and Klasing, {Kirk C.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1098/rspb.2007.0934",
language = "English",
volume = "274",
pages = "2835--2842",
journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1627",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of energy reserves and food availability on optimal immune defence

AU - Houston, Alasdair I.

AU - McNamara, John M.

AU - Barta, Z.

AU - Klasing, Kirk C.

PY - 2007/11/22

Y1 - 2007/11/22

N2 - In order to avoid both starvation and disease, animals must allocate resources between energy reserves and immune defence. We investigate the optimal allocation. We find that animals with low reserves choose to allocate less to defence than animals with higher reserves because when reserves are low it is more important to increase reserves to reduce the risk of starvation in the future. In general, investment in immune defence increases monotonically with energy reserves. An exception is when the animal can reduce its probability of death from disease by reducing its foraging rate. In this case, allocation to immune defence can peak at intermediate reserves. When food changes over time, the optimal response depends on the frequency of changes. If the environment is relatively stable, animals forage most intensively when the food is scarce and invest more in immune defence when the food is abundant than when it is scarce. If the environment changes quickly, animals forage at low intensity when the food is scarce, but at high intensity when the food is abundant. As the rate of environmental change increases, immune defence becomes less dependent on food availability. We show that the strength of selection on reserve-dependent immune defence depends on how foraging intensity and immune defence determine the probability of death from disease.

AB - In order to avoid both starvation and disease, animals must allocate resources between energy reserves and immune defence. We investigate the optimal allocation. We find that animals with low reserves choose to allocate less to defence than animals with higher reserves because when reserves are low it is more important to increase reserves to reduce the risk of starvation in the future. In general, investment in immune defence increases monotonically with energy reserves. An exception is when the animal can reduce its probability of death from disease by reducing its foraging rate. In this case, allocation to immune defence can peak at intermediate reserves. When food changes over time, the optimal response depends on the frequency of changes. If the environment is relatively stable, animals forage most intensively when the food is scarce and invest more in immune defence when the food is abundant than when it is scarce. If the environment changes quickly, animals forage at low intensity when the food is scarce, but at high intensity when the food is abundant. As the rate of environmental change increases, immune defence becomes less dependent on food availability. We show that the strength of selection on reserve-dependent immune defence depends on how foraging intensity and immune defence determine the probability of death from disease.

KW - Dynamic programming

KW - Energy reserves

KW - Immunity

KW - State-dependence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35848938005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35848938005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2007.0934

DO - 10.1098/rspb.2007.0934

M3 - Article

VL - 274

SP - 2835

EP - 2842

JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1627

ER -