The comparative study of two recently developed A-scan devices: Determination of central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth and axial length

Zoltán Sohajda, Júlia Papp, A. Berta, L. Módis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical use and comparison of two recently developed A-scan ultrasound devices. Methods: The same investigator determined central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) with an OcuScan RxP (Alcon, Forth Worth, Texas, USA) and an AL-2000 (Tomey, Erlangen, Germany) ultrasound device in 80 eyes of 40 patients. The mean patient age was 63.72years [standard deviation (SD) 18.92]. The patients did not suffer from any systemic or eye disease affecting the anterior and posterior segments of the eye, and their refractive error (spherical and astigmatic) did not exceed ± 3.0 dioptres. Results: The value of the CCT was 541.55 (SD 34.97) μm with the OcuScan RxP, and 547.46 (SD 35.70) μm with the AL-2000 device (P <0.001). With respect to the ACD and AL, significantly lower values were obtained with the AL-2000 instrument (P <0.001). The ACD was 2.92 (SD 0.48) mm with the AL-2000 and 3.07 (SD 0.47) mm with the OcuScan RxP device. The AL was 22.67 (SD 0.84) mm with the AL-2000 and 22.81 (SD 0.87) mm with the OcuScan RxP instrument. However, a positive and significant correlation could be demonstrated between the devices (r = 0.88 CCT, r = 0.86 ACD and r = 0.91 AL; P <0.001). Conclusion: The instruments are reliable in clinical use; however, statistically significant differences were found between the devices. During patient follow-up, the devices cannot simply be used interchangeably.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-48
Number of pages4
JournalActa Ophthalmologica
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Anterior Chamber
Equipment and Supplies
Posterior Eye Segment
Anterior Eye Segment
Refractive Errors
Eye Diseases
Germany
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Contact method
  • Pachymetry
  • Ultrasound biometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

@article{751a6b98a62c463d923b61a064d7c66b,
title = "The comparative study of two recently developed A-scan devices: Determination of central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth and axial length",
abstract = "Purpose: The clinical use and comparison of two recently developed A-scan ultrasound devices. Methods: The same investigator determined central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) with an OcuScan RxP (Alcon, Forth Worth, Texas, USA) and an AL-2000 (Tomey, Erlangen, Germany) ultrasound device in 80 eyes of 40 patients. The mean patient age was 63.72years [standard deviation (SD) 18.92]. The patients did not suffer from any systemic or eye disease affecting the anterior and posterior segments of the eye, and their refractive error (spherical and astigmatic) did not exceed ± 3.0 dioptres. Results: The value of the CCT was 541.55 (SD 34.97) μm with the OcuScan RxP, and 547.46 (SD 35.70) μm with the AL-2000 device (P <0.001). With respect to the ACD and AL, significantly lower values were obtained with the AL-2000 instrument (P <0.001). The ACD was 2.92 (SD 0.48) mm with the AL-2000 and 3.07 (SD 0.47) mm with the OcuScan RxP device. The AL was 22.67 (SD 0.84) mm with the AL-2000 and 22.81 (SD 0.87) mm with the OcuScan RxP instrument. However, a positive and significant correlation could be demonstrated between the devices (r = 0.88 CCT, r = 0.86 ACD and r = 0.91 AL; P <0.001). Conclusion: The instruments are reliable in clinical use; however, statistically significant differences were found between the devices. During patient follow-up, the devices cannot simply be used interchangeably.",
keywords = "Contact method, Pachymetry, Ultrasound biometry",
author = "Zolt{\'a}n Sohajda and J{\'u}lia Papp and A. Berta and L. M{\'o}dis",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00994.x",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "45--48",
journal = "Acta Ophthalmologica",
issn = "1755-375X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The comparative study of two recently developed A-scan devices

T2 - Determination of central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth and axial length

AU - Sohajda, Zoltán

AU - Papp, Júlia

AU - Berta, A.

AU - Módis, L.

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - Purpose: The clinical use and comparison of two recently developed A-scan ultrasound devices. Methods: The same investigator determined central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) with an OcuScan RxP (Alcon, Forth Worth, Texas, USA) and an AL-2000 (Tomey, Erlangen, Germany) ultrasound device in 80 eyes of 40 patients. The mean patient age was 63.72years [standard deviation (SD) 18.92]. The patients did not suffer from any systemic or eye disease affecting the anterior and posterior segments of the eye, and their refractive error (spherical and astigmatic) did not exceed ± 3.0 dioptres. Results: The value of the CCT was 541.55 (SD 34.97) μm with the OcuScan RxP, and 547.46 (SD 35.70) μm with the AL-2000 device (P <0.001). With respect to the ACD and AL, significantly lower values were obtained with the AL-2000 instrument (P <0.001). The ACD was 2.92 (SD 0.48) mm with the AL-2000 and 3.07 (SD 0.47) mm with the OcuScan RxP device. The AL was 22.67 (SD 0.84) mm with the AL-2000 and 22.81 (SD 0.87) mm with the OcuScan RxP instrument. However, a positive and significant correlation could be demonstrated between the devices (r = 0.88 CCT, r = 0.86 ACD and r = 0.91 AL; P <0.001). Conclusion: The instruments are reliable in clinical use; however, statistically significant differences were found between the devices. During patient follow-up, the devices cannot simply be used interchangeably.

AB - Purpose: The clinical use and comparison of two recently developed A-scan ultrasound devices. Methods: The same investigator determined central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) with an OcuScan RxP (Alcon, Forth Worth, Texas, USA) and an AL-2000 (Tomey, Erlangen, Germany) ultrasound device in 80 eyes of 40 patients. The mean patient age was 63.72years [standard deviation (SD) 18.92]. The patients did not suffer from any systemic or eye disease affecting the anterior and posterior segments of the eye, and their refractive error (spherical and astigmatic) did not exceed ± 3.0 dioptres. Results: The value of the CCT was 541.55 (SD 34.97) μm with the OcuScan RxP, and 547.46 (SD 35.70) μm with the AL-2000 device (P <0.001). With respect to the ACD and AL, significantly lower values were obtained with the AL-2000 instrument (P <0.001). The ACD was 2.92 (SD 0.48) mm with the AL-2000 and 3.07 (SD 0.47) mm with the OcuScan RxP device. The AL was 22.67 (SD 0.84) mm with the AL-2000 and 22.81 (SD 0.87) mm with the OcuScan RxP instrument. However, a positive and significant correlation could be demonstrated between the devices (r = 0.88 CCT, r = 0.86 ACD and r = 0.91 AL; P <0.001). Conclusion: The instruments are reliable in clinical use; however, statistically significant differences were found between the devices. During patient follow-up, the devices cannot simply be used interchangeably.

KW - Contact method

KW - Pachymetry

KW - Ultrasound biometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39349105154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39349105154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00994.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00994.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17651470

AN - SCOPUS:39349105154

VL - 86

SP - 45

EP - 48

JO - Acta Ophthalmologica

JF - Acta Ophthalmologica

SN - 1755-375X

IS - 1

ER -