The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance-Some comments on Martin's "reply"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

No new arguments or evidence that undermine our conviction that available scientometric measures do not indicate a statistically significant "decline" of British science in the first half of the eighties have been found in Martin's reply.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-362
Number of pages4
JournalScientometrics
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1991

Fingerprint

science
performance
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Law

Cite this

The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance-Some comments on Martin's "reply". / Braun, T.; Glänzel, W.; Schubert, A.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 20, No. 2, 02.1991, p. 359-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{289a2ab8ad1a4c18bc9b9173bb1427bb,
title = "The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance-Some comments on Martin's {"}reply{"}",
abstract = "No new arguments or evidence that undermine our conviction that available scientometric measures do not indicate a statistically significant {"}decline{"} of British science in the first half of the eighties have been found in Martin's reply.",
author = "T. Braun and W. Gl{\"a}nzel and A. Schubert",
year = "1991",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/BF02017525",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "359--362",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance-Some comments on Martin's "reply"

AU - Braun, T.

AU - Glänzel, W.

AU - Schubert, A.

PY - 1991/2

Y1 - 1991/2

N2 - No new arguments or evidence that undermine our conviction that available scientometric measures do not indicate a statistically significant "decline" of British science in the first half of the eighties have been found in Martin's reply.

AB - No new arguments or evidence that undermine our conviction that available scientometric measures do not indicate a statistically significant "decline" of British science in the first half of the eighties have been found in Martin's reply.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0010582975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0010582975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02017525

DO - 10.1007/BF02017525

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0010582975

VL - 20

SP - 359

EP - 362

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 2

ER -