The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality

Results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS)

Rathi Ravindrarajah, David M. Lee, Stephen R. Pye, Evelien Gielen, Steven Boonen, Dirk Vanderschueren, Neil Pendleton, Joseph D. Finn, Abdelouahid Tajar, Matthew D L O'Connell, Kenneth Rockwood, G. Bártfai, Felipe F. Casanueva, Gianni Forti, Aleksander Giwercman, Thang S. Han, Ilpo T. Huhtaniemi, Krzysztof Kula, Michael E J Lean, Margus Punab & 20 others Frederick C W Wu, Terence W. O'Neill, Luisa Petrone, Giovanni Corona, Herman Borghs, Jolanta Slowikowska-Hilczer, Renata Walczak-Jedrzejowska, Ilpo Huhtaniemi, Frederick Wu, Terence O'Neill, Joseph Finn, Philip Steer, David Lee, Stephen Pye, Felipe Casanueva, Ana I. Castro, I. Földesi, I. Fejes, Paul Korrovitz, Min Jiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few studies have directly compared the ability of the most commonly used models of frailty to predict mortality among community-dwelling individuals. Here, we used a frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), and FRAIL scale (FS) to predict mortality in the EMAS. Participants were aged 40-79 years (n=2929) at baseline and 6.6% (n=193) died over a median 4.3 years of follow-up. The FI was generated from 39 deficits, including self-reported health, morbidities, functional performance and psychological assessments. The FP and FS consisted of five phenotypic criteria and both categorized individuals as robust when they had 0 criteria, prefrail as 1-2 criteria and frail as 3+ criteria. The mean FI increased linearly with age (r2=0.21) and in Cox regression models adjusted for age, center, smoking and partner status the hazard ratio (HR) for death for each unit increase of the FI was 1.49. Men who were prefrail or frail by either the FP or FS definitions, had a significantly increased risk of death compared to their robust counterparts. Compared to robust men, those who were FP frail at baseline had a HR for death of 3.84, while those who were FS frail had a HR of 3.87. All three frailty models significantly predicted future mortality among community-dwelling, middle-aged and older European men after adjusting for potential confounders. Our data suggest that the choice of frailty model may not be of paramount importance when predicting future risk of death, enabling flexibility in the approach used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)360-368
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Aptitude
mortality
death
Independent Living
Phenotype
cause
Mortality
ability
Proportional Hazards Models
morbidity
community
smoking
deficit
flexibility
Smoking
Psychology
Morbidity
regression
Health
health

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Frailty index
  • Frailty phenotype
  • Male health
  • Mortality
  • Population-based

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ageing
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Health(social science)
  • Gerontology

Cite this

The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality : Results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS). / Ravindrarajah, Rathi; Lee, David M.; Pye, Stephen R.; Gielen, Evelien; Boonen, Steven; Vanderschueren, Dirk; Pendleton, Neil; Finn, Joseph D.; Tajar, Abdelouahid; O'Connell, Matthew D L; Rockwood, Kenneth; Bártfai, G.; Casanueva, Felipe F.; Forti, Gianni; Giwercman, Aleksander; Han, Thang S.; Huhtaniemi, Ilpo T.; Kula, Krzysztof; Lean, Michael E J; Punab, Margus; Wu, Frederick C W; O'Neill, Terence W.; Petrone, Luisa; Corona, Giovanni; Borghs, Herman; Slowikowska-Hilczer, Jolanta; Walczak-Jedrzejowska, Renata; Huhtaniemi, Ilpo; Wu, Frederick; O'Neill, Terence; Finn, Joseph; Steer, Philip; Lee, David; Pye, Stephen; Casanueva, Felipe; Castro, Ana I.; Földesi, I.; Fejes, I.; Korrovitz, Paul; Jiang, Min.

In: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Vol. 57, No. 3, 11.2013, p. 360-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ravindrarajah, R, Lee, DM, Pye, SR, Gielen, E, Boonen, S, Vanderschueren, D, Pendleton, N, Finn, JD, Tajar, A, O'Connell, MDL, Rockwood, K, Bártfai, G, Casanueva, FF, Forti, G, Giwercman, A, Han, TS, Huhtaniemi, IT, Kula, K, Lean, MEJ, Punab, M, Wu, FCW, O'Neill, TW, Petrone, L, Corona, G, Borghs, H, Slowikowska-Hilczer, J, Walczak-Jedrzejowska, R, Huhtaniemi, I, Wu, F, O'Neill, T, Finn, J, Steer, P, Lee, D, Pye, S, Casanueva, F, Castro, AI, Földesi, I, Fejes, I, Korrovitz, P & Jiang, M 2013, 'The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality: Results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS)', Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 360-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2013.06.010
Ravindrarajah, Rathi ; Lee, David M. ; Pye, Stephen R. ; Gielen, Evelien ; Boonen, Steven ; Vanderschueren, Dirk ; Pendleton, Neil ; Finn, Joseph D. ; Tajar, Abdelouahid ; O'Connell, Matthew D L ; Rockwood, Kenneth ; Bártfai, G. ; Casanueva, Felipe F. ; Forti, Gianni ; Giwercman, Aleksander ; Han, Thang S. ; Huhtaniemi, Ilpo T. ; Kula, Krzysztof ; Lean, Michael E J ; Punab, Margus ; Wu, Frederick C W ; O'Neill, Terence W. ; Petrone, Luisa ; Corona, Giovanni ; Borghs, Herman ; Slowikowska-Hilczer, Jolanta ; Walczak-Jedrzejowska, Renata ; Huhtaniemi, Ilpo ; Wu, Frederick ; O'Neill, Terence ; Finn, Joseph ; Steer, Philip ; Lee, David ; Pye, Stephen ; Casanueva, Felipe ; Castro, Ana I. ; Földesi, I. ; Fejes, I. ; Korrovitz, Paul ; Jiang, Min. / The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality : Results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS). In: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2013 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 360-368.
@article{f6cccb58543348d79c9cb4454008fc96,
title = "The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality: Results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS)",
abstract = "Few studies have directly compared the ability of the most commonly used models of frailty to predict mortality among community-dwelling individuals. Here, we used a frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), and FRAIL scale (FS) to predict mortality in the EMAS. Participants were aged 40-79 years (n=2929) at baseline and 6.6{\%} (n=193) died over a median 4.3 years of follow-up. The FI was generated from 39 deficits, including self-reported health, morbidities, functional performance and psychological assessments. The FP and FS consisted of five phenotypic criteria and both categorized individuals as robust when they had 0 criteria, prefrail as 1-2 criteria and frail as 3+ criteria. The mean FI increased linearly with age (r2=0.21) and in Cox regression models adjusted for age, center, smoking and partner status the hazard ratio (HR) for death for each unit increase of the FI was 1.49. Men who were prefrail or frail by either the FP or FS definitions, had a significantly increased risk of death compared to their robust counterparts. Compared to robust men, those who were FP frail at baseline had a HR for death of 3.84, while those who were FS frail had a HR of 3.87. All three frailty models significantly predicted future mortality among community-dwelling, middle-aged and older European men after adjusting for potential confounders. Our data suggest that the choice of frailty model may not be of paramount importance when predicting future risk of death, enabling flexibility in the approach used.",
keywords = "Aging, Frailty index, Frailty phenotype, Male health, Mortality, Population-based",
author = "Rathi Ravindrarajah and Lee, {David M.} and Pye, {Stephen R.} and Evelien Gielen and Steven Boonen and Dirk Vanderschueren and Neil Pendleton and Finn, {Joseph D.} and Abdelouahid Tajar and O'Connell, {Matthew D L} and Kenneth Rockwood and G. B{\'a}rtfai and Casanueva, {Felipe F.} and Gianni Forti and Aleksander Giwercman and Han, {Thang S.} and Huhtaniemi, {Ilpo T.} and Krzysztof Kula and Lean, {Michael E J} and Margus Punab and Wu, {Frederick C W} and O'Neill, {Terence W.} and Luisa Petrone and Giovanni Corona and Herman Borghs and Jolanta Slowikowska-Hilczer and Renata Walczak-Jedrzejowska and Ilpo Huhtaniemi and Frederick Wu and Terence O'Neill and Joseph Finn and Philip Steer and David Lee and Stephen Pye and Felipe Casanueva and Castro, {Ana I.} and I. F{\"o}ldesi and I. Fejes and Paul Korrovitz and Min Jiang",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.archger.2013.06.010",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "360--368",
journal = "Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics",
issn = "0167-4943",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ability of three different models of frailty to predict all-cause mortality

T2 - Results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS)

AU - Ravindrarajah, Rathi

AU - Lee, David M.

AU - Pye, Stephen R.

AU - Gielen, Evelien

AU - Boonen, Steven

AU - Vanderschueren, Dirk

AU - Pendleton, Neil

AU - Finn, Joseph D.

AU - Tajar, Abdelouahid

AU - O'Connell, Matthew D L

AU - Rockwood, Kenneth

AU - Bártfai, G.

AU - Casanueva, Felipe F.

AU - Forti, Gianni

AU - Giwercman, Aleksander

AU - Han, Thang S.

AU - Huhtaniemi, Ilpo T.

AU - Kula, Krzysztof

AU - Lean, Michael E J

AU - Punab, Margus

AU - Wu, Frederick C W

AU - O'Neill, Terence W.

AU - Petrone, Luisa

AU - Corona, Giovanni

AU - Borghs, Herman

AU - Slowikowska-Hilczer, Jolanta

AU - Walczak-Jedrzejowska, Renata

AU - Huhtaniemi, Ilpo

AU - Wu, Frederick

AU - O'Neill, Terence

AU - Finn, Joseph

AU - Steer, Philip

AU - Lee, David

AU - Pye, Stephen

AU - Casanueva, Felipe

AU - Castro, Ana I.

AU - Földesi, I.

AU - Fejes, I.

AU - Korrovitz, Paul

AU - Jiang, Min

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Few studies have directly compared the ability of the most commonly used models of frailty to predict mortality among community-dwelling individuals. Here, we used a frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), and FRAIL scale (FS) to predict mortality in the EMAS. Participants were aged 40-79 years (n=2929) at baseline and 6.6% (n=193) died over a median 4.3 years of follow-up. The FI was generated from 39 deficits, including self-reported health, morbidities, functional performance and psychological assessments. The FP and FS consisted of five phenotypic criteria and both categorized individuals as robust when they had 0 criteria, prefrail as 1-2 criteria and frail as 3+ criteria. The mean FI increased linearly with age (r2=0.21) and in Cox regression models adjusted for age, center, smoking and partner status the hazard ratio (HR) for death for each unit increase of the FI was 1.49. Men who were prefrail or frail by either the FP or FS definitions, had a significantly increased risk of death compared to their robust counterparts. Compared to robust men, those who were FP frail at baseline had a HR for death of 3.84, while those who were FS frail had a HR of 3.87. All three frailty models significantly predicted future mortality among community-dwelling, middle-aged and older European men after adjusting for potential confounders. Our data suggest that the choice of frailty model may not be of paramount importance when predicting future risk of death, enabling flexibility in the approach used.

AB - Few studies have directly compared the ability of the most commonly used models of frailty to predict mortality among community-dwelling individuals. Here, we used a frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype (FP), and FRAIL scale (FS) to predict mortality in the EMAS. Participants were aged 40-79 years (n=2929) at baseline and 6.6% (n=193) died over a median 4.3 years of follow-up. The FI was generated from 39 deficits, including self-reported health, morbidities, functional performance and psychological assessments. The FP and FS consisted of five phenotypic criteria and both categorized individuals as robust when they had 0 criteria, prefrail as 1-2 criteria and frail as 3+ criteria. The mean FI increased linearly with age (r2=0.21) and in Cox regression models adjusted for age, center, smoking and partner status the hazard ratio (HR) for death for each unit increase of the FI was 1.49. Men who were prefrail or frail by either the FP or FS definitions, had a significantly increased risk of death compared to their robust counterparts. Compared to robust men, those who were FP frail at baseline had a HR for death of 3.84, while those who were FS frail had a HR of 3.87. All three frailty models significantly predicted future mortality among community-dwelling, middle-aged and older European men after adjusting for potential confounders. Our data suggest that the choice of frailty model may not be of paramount importance when predicting future risk of death, enabling flexibility in the approach used.

KW - Aging

KW - Frailty index

KW - Frailty phenotype

KW - Male health

KW - Mortality

KW - Population-based

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881668496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881668496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.archger.2013.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.archger.2013.06.010

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 360

EP - 368

JO - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

JF - Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

SN - 0167-4943

IS - 3

ER -