Structural genomics analysis

Characteristics of atypical, common, and horizontally transferred folds

H. Hegyi, Jimmy Lin, Dov Greenbaum, Mark Gerstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted a structural genomics analysis of the folds and structural superfamilies in the first 20 completely sequenced genomes by focusing on the patterns of fold usage and trying to identify structural characteristics of typical and atypical folds. We assigned folds to sequences using PSI-blast, run with a systematic protocol to reduce the amount of computational overhead. On average, folds could be assigned to about a fourth of the ORFs in the genomes and about a fifth of the amino acids in the proteomes. More than 80% of all the folds in the SCOP structural classification were identified in one of the 20 organisms, with worm and E. coli having the largest number of distinct folds. Folds are particularly effective at comprehensively measuring levels of gene duplication, because they group together even very remote homologues. Using folds, we find the average level of duplication varies depending on the complexity of the organism, ranging from 2.4 in M. genitalium to 32 for the worm, values significantly higher than those observed based purely on sequence similarity. We rank the common folds in the 20 organisms, finding that the top three are the P-loop NTP hydrolase, the ferrodoxin fold, and the TIM-barrel, and discuss in detail the many factors that affect and bias these rankings. We also identify atypical folds that are "unique" to one of the organisms in our study and compare the characteristics of these folds with the most common ones. We find that common folds tend be more multifunctional and associated with more regular, "symmetrical" structures than the unique ones. In addition, many of the unique folds are associated with proteins involved in cell defense (e.g., toxins). We analyze specific patterns of fold occurrence in the genomes by associating some of them with instances of horizontal transfer and others with gene loss. In particular, we find three possible examples of transfer between archaea and bacteria and six between eukarya and bacteria. We make available our detailed results at http://genecensus.org/20.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-141
Number of pages16
JournalProteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2002

Fingerprint

Genomics
Genes
Genome
Bacteria
Gene Duplication
Archaea
Hydrolases
Proteome
Eukaryota
Open Reading Frames
Escherichia coli
Amino Acids
Proteins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Structural Biology
  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Structural genomics analysis : Characteristics of atypical, common, and horizontally transferred folds. / Hegyi, H.; Lin, Jimmy; Greenbaum, Dov; Gerstein, Mark.

In: Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.05.2002, p. 126-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3316d71c0da54b888bb0da21ad283ba0,
title = "Structural genomics analysis: Characteristics of atypical, common, and horizontally transferred folds",
abstract = "We conducted a structural genomics analysis of the folds and structural superfamilies in the first 20 completely sequenced genomes by focusing on the patterns of fold usage and trying to identify structural characteristics of typical and atypical folds. We assigned folds to sequences using PSI-blast, run with a systematic protocol to reduce the amount of computational overhead. On average, folds could be assigned to about a fourth of the ORFs in the genomes and about a fifth of the amino acids in the proteomes. More than 80{\%} of all the folds in the SCOP structural classification were identified in one of the 20 organisms, with worm and E. coli having the largest number of distinct folds. Folds are particularly effective at comprehensively measuring levels of gene duplication, because they group together even very remote homologues. Using folds, we find the average level of duplication varies depending on the complexity of the organism, ranging from 2.4 in M. genitalium to 32 for the worm, values significantly higher than those observed based purely on sequence similarity. We rank the common folds in the 20 organisms, finding that the top three are the P-loop NTP hydrolase, the ferrodoxin fold, and the TIM-barrel, and discuss in detail the many factors that affect and bias these rankings. We also identify atypical folds that are {"}unique{"} to one of the organisms in our study and compare the characteristics of these folds with the most common ones. We find that common folds tend be more multifunctional and associated with more regular, {"}symmetrical{"} structures than the unique ones. In addition, many of the unique folds are associated with proteins involved in cell defense (e.g., toxins). We analyze specific patterns of fold occurrence in the genomes by associating some of them with instances of horizontal transfer and others with gene loss. In particular, we find three possible examples of transfer between archaea and bacteria and six between eukarya and bacteria. We make available our detailed results at http://genecensus.org/20.",
author = "H. Hegyi and Jimmy Lin and Dov Greenbaum and Mark Gerstein",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/prot.10078",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "126--141",
journal = "Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics",
issn = "0887-3585",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural genomics analysis

T2 - Characteristics of atypical, common, and horizontally transferred folds

AU - Hegyi, H.

AU - Lin, Jimmy

AU - Greenbaum, Dov

AU - Gerstein, Mark

PY - 2002/5/1

Y1 - 2002/5/1

N2 - We conducted a structural genomics analysis of the folds and structural superfamilies in the first 20 completely sequenced genomes by focusing on the patterns of fold usage and trying to identify structural characteristics of typical and atypical folds. We assigned folds to sequences using PSI-blast, run with a systematic protocol to reduce the amount of computational overhead. On average, folds could be assigned to about a fourth of the ORFs in the genomes and about a fifth of the amino acids in the proteomes. More than 80% of all the folds in the SCOP structural classification were identified in one of the 20 organisms, with worm and E. coli having the largest number of distinct folds. Folds are particularly effective at comprehensively measuring levels of gene duplication, because they group together even very remote homologues. Using folds, we find the average level of duplication varies depending on the complexity of the organism, ranging from 2.4 in M. genitalium to 32 for the worm, values significantly higher than those observed based purely on sequence similarity. We rank the common folds in the 20 organisms, finding that the top three are the P-loop NTP hydrolase, the ferrodoxin fold, and the TIM-barrel, and discuss in detail the many factors that affect and bias these rankings. We also identify atypical folds that are "unique" to one of the organisms in our study and compare the characteristics of these folds with the most common ones. We find that common folds tend be more multifunctional and associated with more regular, "symmetrical" structures than the unique ones. In addition, many of the unique folds are associated with proteins involved in cell defense (e.g., toxins). We analyze specific patterns of fold occurrence in the genomes by associating some of them with instances of horizontal transfer and others with gene loss. In particular, we find three possible examples of transfer between archaea and bacteria and six between eukarya and bacteria. We make available our detailed results at http://genecensus.org/20.

AB - We conducted a structural genomics analysis of the folds and structural superfamilies in the first 20 completely sequenced genomes by focusing on the patterns of fold usage and trying to identify structural characteristics of typical and atypical folds. We assigned folds to sequences using PSI-blast, run with a systematic protocol to reduce the amount of computational overhead. On average, folds could be assigned to about a fourth of the ORFs in the genomes and about a fifth of the amino acids in the proteomes. More than 80% of all the folds in the SCOP structural classification were identified in one of the 20 organisms, with worm and E. coli having the largest number of distinct folds. Folds are particularly effective at comprehensively measuring levels of gene duplication, because they group together even very remote homologues. Using folds, we find the average level of duplication varies depending on the complexity of the organism, ranging from 2.4 in M. genitalium to 32 for the worm, values significantly higher than those observed based purely on sequence similarity. We rank the common folds in the 20 organisms, finding that the top three are the P-loop NTP hydrolase, the ferrodoxin fold, and the TIM-barrel, and discuss in detail the many factors that affect and bias these rankings. We also identify atypical folds that are "unique" to one of the organisms in our study and compare the characteristics of these folds with the most common ones. We find that common folds tend be more multifunctional and associated with more regular, "symmetrical" structures than the unique ones. In addition, many of the unique folds are associated with proteins involved in cell defense (e.g., toxins). We analyze specific patterns of fold occurrence in the genomes by associating some of them with instances of horizontal transfer and others with gene loss. In particular, we find three possible examples of transfer between archaea and bacteria and six between eukarya and bacteria. We make available our detailed results at http://genecensus.org/20.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036568328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036568328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/prot.10078

DO - 10.1002/prot.10078

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 126

EP - 141

JO - Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

JF - Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

SN - 0887-3585

IS - 2

ER -