Stereochemical definitions and nomenclature

Changing signs?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Classification of chirality rests on the elements of asymmetry, a concept theoretically questionable, but useful. In chemistry, the Cahn, Ingold, Prelog (CIP) Convention is well-established, generally accepted, and applied. It introduced the R- and S- prefixes to be applied before the names of compounds involving a single asymmetry element, or the M- and P- prefixes for helical asymmetry. For molecules involving multiple elements of asymmetry, the prefixes were complementary with reference to the exact location and should be distinctively applied to each element. If the same system were applied to international nonproprietary (generic) drug names, awkward notations would result. To this end, the SIGNS nomenclature was proposed. In practice, neither of the stereochemical systems is applied, leading to a high degree of ignorance about the number and quality of the pharmacological entities implied by common drug names.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)533-540
Number of pages8
JournalTherapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Terminology
Generic Drugs
Names
Pharmacology
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • CIP convention
  • SIGNS nomenclature
  • Stereochemical characterization of drug names

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Stereochemical definitions and nomenclature : Changing signs? / Simonyi, M.

In: Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1994, p. 533-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c709cd83f5149fd9a240599f1a37d54,
title = "Stereochemical definitions and nomenclature: Changing signs?",
abstract = "Classification of chirality rests on the elements of asymmetry, a concept theoretically questionable, but useful. In chemistry, the Cahn, Ingold, Prelog (CIP) Convention is well-established, generally accepted, and applied. It introduced the R- and S- prefixes to be applied before the names of compounds involving a single asymmetry element, or the M- and P- prefixes for helical asymmetry. For molecules involving multiple elements of asymmetry, the prefixes were complementary with reference to the exact location and should be distinctively applied to each element. If the same system were applied to international nonproprietary (generic) drug names, awkward notations would result. To this end, the SIGNS nomenclature was proposed. In practice, neither of the stereochemical systems is applied, leading to a high degree of ignorance about the number and quality of the pharmacological entities implied by common drug names.",
keywords = "CIP convention, SIGNS nomenclature, Stereochemical characterization of drug names",
author = "M. Simonyi",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1177/009286159402800228",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "533--540",
journal = "Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science",
issn = "2168-4790",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stereochemical definitions and nomenclature

T2 - Changing signs?

AU - Simonyi, M.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Classification of chirality rests on the elements of asymmetry, a concept theoretically questionable, but useful. In chemistry, the Cahn, Ingold, Prelog (CIP) Convention is well-established, generally accepted, and applied. It introduced the R- and S- prefixes to be applied before the names of compounds involving a single asymmetry element, or the M- and P- prefixes for helical asymmetry. For molecules involving multiple elements of asymmetry, the prefixes were complementary with reference to the exact location and should be distinctively applied to each element. If the same system were applied to international nonproprietary (generic) drug names, awkward notations would result. To this end, the SIGNS nomenclature was proposed. In practice, neither of the stereochemical systems is applied, leading to a high degree of ignorance about the number and quality of the pharmacological entities implied by common drug names.

AB - Classification of chirality rests on the elements of asymmetry, a concept theoretically questionable, but useful. In chemistry, the Cahn, Ingold, Prelog (CIP) Convention is well-established, generally accepted, and applied. It introduced the R- and S- prefixes to be applied before the names of compounds involving a single asymmetry element, or the M- and P- prefixes for helical asymmetry. For molecules involving multiple elements of asymmetry, the prefixes were complementary with reference to the exact location and should be distinctively applied to each element. If the same system were applied to international nonproprietary (generic) drug names, awkward notations would result. To this end, the SIGNS nomenclature was proposed. In practice, neither of the stereochemical systems is applied, leading to a high degree of ignorance about the number and quality of the pharmacological entities implied by common drug names.

KW - CIP convention

KW - SIGNS nomenclature

KW - Stereochemical characterization of drug names

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973817217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973817217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/009286159402800228

DO - 10.1177/009286159402800228

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 533

EP - 540

JO - Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science

JF - Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science

SN - 2168-4790

IS - 2

ER -