Some ethical implications of neurosciences

C. Susanne, M. Szente

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The new methods of modern sciences can contribute to understand the genesis of mental illness, the disturbances in brain chemistry, physiology, anatomy or genetical information underlying different diseases of the nervous system. Understanding mental illness is not only challenging to science, but is also of great social importance. Moreover, the new developments of neurosciences put new lights on discussions such as brain-mind concepts, unity of mind, definition of consciousness and even definition of the person. For the majority of the scientists, it is clear today that the mind can not be conceived any more as unique and indivisible. For philosophers, it is clear also that neuroscience influenced their vision of life and death: neurosciences are not strange to the debate whole-body death versus whole-brain death for instance. Modern scientific achievements have expanded our vision, allowing us to percieve previously unanticipated interrelationships between biological and psychological phenomena. The boundary between some behavioural and higher neural function studies and biology is arbitrary and changing. It has been imposed not by the natural contours of the disciplines, but by lack of knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-121
Number of pages11
JournalGlobal Bioethics
Volume10
Issue number1-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Neurosciences
neurosciences
brain
death
mental illness
Brain Chemistry
Biological Phenomena
Brain Death
physiology
Nervous System Diseases
science
Consciousness
consciousness
biology
Anatomy
chemistry
Psychology
Disease
Light
human being

Keywords

  • consciousness
  • neurosciences
  • split brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Some ethical implications of neurosciences. / Susanne, C.; Szente, M.

In: Global Bioethics, Vol. 10, No. 1-4, 01.01.1997, p. 111-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Susanne, C. ; Szente, M. / Some ethical implications of neurosciences. In: Global Bioethics. 1997 ; Vol. 10, No. 1-4. pp. 111-121.
@article{e26c968d08d44a3c84cc08bb44a9b43e,
title = "Some ethical implications of neurosciences",
abstract = "The new methods of modern sciences can contribute to understand the genesis of mental illness, the disturbances in brain chemistry, physiology, anatomy or genetical information underlying different diseases of the nervous system. Understanding mental illness is not only challenging to science, but is also of great social importance. Moreover, the new developments of neurosciences put new lights on discussions such as brain-mind concepts, unity of mind, definition of consciousness and even definition of the person. For the majority of the scientists, it is clear today that the mind can not be conceived any more as unique and indivisible. For philosophers, it is clear also that neuroscience influenced their vision of life and death: neurosciences are not strange to the debate whole-body death versus whole-brain death for instance. Modern scientific achievements have expanded our vision, allowing us to percieve previously unanticipated interrelationships between biological and psychological phenomena. The boundary between some behavioural and higher neural function studies and biology is arbitrary and changing. It has been imposed not by the natural contours of the disciplines, but by lack of knowledge.",
keywords = "consciousness, neurosciences, split brain",
author = "C. Susanne and M. Szente",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/11287462.1997.10800719",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "111--121",
journal = "Global Bioethics",
issn = "1128-7462",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some ethical implications of neurosciences

AU - Susanne, C.

AU - Szente, M.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - The new methods of modern sciences can contribute to understand the genesis of mental illness, the disturbances in brain chemistry, physiology, anatomy or genetical information underlying different diseases of the nervous system. Understanding mental illness is not only challenging to science, but is also of great social importance. Moreover, the new developments of neurosciences put new lights on discussions such as brain-mind concepts, unity of mind, definition of consciousness and even definition of the person. For the majority of the scientists, it is clear today that the mind can not be conceived any more as unique and indivisible. For philosophers, it is clear also that neuroscience influenced their vision of life and death: neurosciences are not strange to the debate whole-body death versus whole-brain death for instance. Modern scientific achievements have expanded our vision, allowing us to percieve previously unanticipated interrelationships between biological and psychological phenomena. The boundary between some behavioural and higher neural function studies and biology is arbitrary and changing. It has been imposed not by the natural contours of the disciplines, but by lack of knowledge.

AB - The new methods of modern sciences can contribute to understand the genesis of mental illness, the disturbances in brain chemistry, physiology, anatomy or genetical information underlying different diseases of the nervous system. Understanding mental illness is not only challenging to science, but is also of great social importance. Moreover, the new developments of neurosciences put new lights on discussions such as brain-mind concepts, unity of mind, definition of consciousness and even definition of the person. For the majority of the scientists, it is clear today that the mind can not be conceived any more as unique and indivisible. For philosophers, it is clear also that neuroscience influenced their vision of life and death: neurosciences are not strange to the debate whole-body death versus whole-brain death for instance. Modern scientific achievements have expanded our vision, allowing us to percieve previously unanticipated interrelationships between biological and psychological phenomena. The boundary between some behavioural and higher neural function studies and biology is arbitrary and changing. It has been imposed not by the natural contours of the disciplines, but by lack of knowledge.

KW - consciousness

KW - neurosciences

KW - split brain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070474705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070474705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/11287462.1997.10800719

DO - 10.1080/11287462.1997.10800719

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070474705

VL - 10

SP - 111

EP - 121

JO - Global Bioethics

JF - Global Bioethics

SN - 1128-7462

IS - 1-4

ER -