Simultaneous viewing of own and parasitic eggs is not required for egg rejection by a cuckoo host

Miklós Bán, C. Moskát, Z. Barta, Márk E. Hauber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many hosts have evolved diverse cognitive mechanisms to recognize and reduce the cost of social parasitism. For example, great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus can accurately reject closely mimetic eggs of brood parasitic common cuckoos Cuculus canorus. Yet, these same hosts are less effective at identifying and rejecting parasitism when the clutch is parasitized by multiple cuckoo eggs, suggesting a role for discordancy (the rejection of the egg type in the minority of the clutch) and/or online self-referent phenotype matching (the simultaneous viewing of cuckoo and own eggs in the nest) to reject foreign eggs. We tested whether the presence of host's own eggs is required for the discrimination of foreign eggs by dyeing hosts' own eggs with one of several colors so that clutches contained (a) 1 dyed and 4 unmanipulated eggs, (b) 3 dyed and 2 unmanipulated eggs, or 5 eggs dyed either (c1) differently or (c2) similarly. Rejection rates of dyed eggs varied widely between different colors and were highest in treatment (a), with 1 dyed egg, compared with treatments with the majority (b) or all (c1 and c2) dyed eggs. However, relative rejection rates of dyed eggs were also consistent among specific colors across treatments, including (c1) and (c2), where no unmanipulated own eggs were available for viewing and irrespective of whether eggs were dyed all different colors (c1) or the same colors (c2). We conclude that these hosts can rely on comparisons of foreign egg colors against an internal recognition template of acceptable (own) egg phenotypes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1014-1021
Number of pages8
JournalBehavioral Ecology
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

egg rejection
egg
color
social parasitism
Cuculus canorus
Cuculidae
phenotype
dyeing
parasitism
nests

Keywords

  • brood parasitism
  • egg recognition
  • egg rejection
  • multiple parasitism
  • phenotype matching
  • recognition template.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Simultaneous viewing of own and parasitic eggs is not required for egg rejection by a cuckoo host. / Bán, Miklós; Moskát, C.; Barta, Z.; Hauber, Márk E.

In: Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 07.2013, p. 1014-1021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{37174b2bb0de45fe90bf7b64eda27607,
title = "Simultaneous viewing of own and parasitic eggs is not required for egg rejection by a cuckoo host",
abstract = "Many hosts have evolved diverse cognitive mechanisms to recognize and reduce the cost of social parasitism. For example, great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus can accurately reject closely mimetic eggs of brood parasitic common cuckoos Cuculus canorus. Yet, these same hosts are less effective at identifying and rejecting parasitism when the clutch is parasitized by multiple cuckoo eggs, suggesting a role for discordancy (the rejection of the egg type in the minority of the clutch) and/or online self-referent phenotype matching (the simultaneous viewing of cuckoo and own eggs in the nest) to reject foreign eggs. We tested whether the presence of host's own eggs is required for the discrimination of foreign eggs by dyeing hosts' own eggs with one of several colors so that clutches contained (a) 1 dyed and 4 unmanipulated eggs, (b) 3 dyed and 2 unmanipulated eggs, or 5 eggs dyed either (c1) differently or (c2) similarly. Rejection rates of dyed eggs varied widely between different colors and were highest in treatment (a), with 1 dyed egg, compared with treatments with the majority (b) or all (c1 and c2) dyed eggs. However, relative rejection rates of dyed eggs were also consistent among specific colors across treatments, including (c1) and (c2), where no unmanipulated own eggs were available for viewing and irrespective of whether eggs were dyed all different colors (c1) or the same colors (c2). We conclude that these hosts can rely on comparisons of foreign egg colors against an internal recognition template of acceptable (own) egg phenotypes.",
keywords = "brood parasitism, egg recognition, egg rejection, multiple parasitism, phenotype matching, recognition template.",
author = "Mikl{\'o}s B{\'a}n and C. Mosk{\'a}t and Z. Barta and Hauber, {M{\'a}rk E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1093/beheco/art004",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1014--1021",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology",
issn = "1045-2249",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simultaneous viewing of own and parasitic eggs is not required for egg rejection by a cuckoo host

AU - Bán, Miklós

AU - Moskát, C.

AU - Barta, Z.

AU - Hauber, Márk E.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Many hosts have evolved diverse cognitive mechanisms to recognize and reduce the cost of social parasitism. For example, great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus can accurately reject closely mimetic eggs of brood parasitic common cuckoos Cuculus canorus. Yet, these same hosts are less effective at identifying and rejecting parasitism when the clutch is parasitized by multiple cuckoo eggs, suggesting a role for discordancy (the rejection of the egg type in the minority of the clutch) and/or online self-referent phenotype matching (the simultaneous viewing of cuckoo and own eggs in the nest) to reject foreign eggs. We tested whether the presence of host's own eggs is required for the discrimination of foreign eggs by dyeing hosts' own eggs with one of several colors so that clutches contained (a) 1 dyed and 4 unmanipulated eggs, (b) 3 dyed and 2 unmanipulated eggs, or 5 eggs dyed either (c1) differently or (c2) similarly. Rejection rates of dyed eggs varied widely between different colors and were highest in treatment (a), with 1 dyed egg, compared with treatments with the majority (b) or all (c1 and c2) dyed eggs. However, relative rejection rates of dyed eggs were also consistent among specific colors across treatments, including (c1) and (c2), where no unmanipulated own eggs were available for viewing and irrespective of whether eggs were dyed all different colors (c1) or the same colors (c2). We conclude that these hosts can rely on comparisons of foreign egg colors against an internal recognition template of acceptable (own) egg phenotypes.

AB - Many hosts have evolved diverse cognitive mechanisms to recognize and reduce the cost of social parasitism. For example, great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus can accurately reject closely mimetic eggs of brood parasitic common cuckoos Cuculus canorus. Yet, these same hosts are less effective at identifying and rejecting parasitism when the clutch is parasitized by multiple cuckoo eggs, suggesting a role for discordancy (the rejection of the egg type in the minority of the clutch) and/or online self-referent phenotype matching (the simultaneous viewing of cuckoo and own eggs in the nest) to reject foreign eggs. We tested whether the presence of host's own eggs is required for the discrimination of foreign eggs by dyeing hosts' own eggs with one of several colors so that clutches contained (a) 1 dyed and 4 unmanipulated eggs, (b) 3 dyed and 2 unmanipulated eggs, or 5 eggs dyed either (c1) differently or (c2) similarly. Rejection rates of dyed eggs varied widely between different colors and were highest in treatment (a), with 1 dyed egg, compared with treatments with the majority (b) or all (c1 and c2) dyed eggs. However, relative rejection rates of dyed eggs were also consistent among specific colors across treatments, including (c1) and (c2), where no unmanipulated own eggs were available for viewing and irrespective of whether eggs were dyed all different colors (c1) or the same colors (c2). We conclude that these hosts can rely on comparisons of foreign egg colors against an internal recognition template of acceptable (own) egg phenotypes.

KW - brood parasitism

KW - egg recognition

KW - egg rejection

KW - multiple parasitism

KW - phenotype matching

KW - recognition template.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879081537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879081537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/beheco/art004

DO - 10.1093/beheco/art004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84879081537

VL - 24

SP - 1014

EP - 1021

JO - Behavioral Ecology

JF - Behavioral Ecology

SN - 1045-2249

IS - 4

ER -