Should young ever be better off with one parent than with two?

John M. McNamara, Alasdair I. Houston, Zoltán Barta, José Luis Osorno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

116 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyze models of parental care, providing the first systematic comparison of the care given to young by one parent versus by two parents. In the Houston-Davies model of care, young always do better with two parents rather than with one parent. When one parent decides about its level of care before the other, then the young may do better with one parent when the costs of care for the parents are asymmetric. When the level of parental effort is reached by negotiation, there are cases in which young do better with one parent, even when costs are symmetric. The analysis suggests empirical ways to differentiate between different response rules.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-310
Number of pages10
JournalBehavioral Ecology
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2003

Keywords

  • Game theory
  • Mate removal
  • Negotiation
  • Parental effort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Should young ever be better off with one parent than with two?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this