Sequential, Structural and Functional Properties of Protein Complexes Are Defined by How Folding and Binding Intertwine

Bálint Mészáros, László Dobson, Erzsébet Fichó, G. Tusnády, Z. Dosztányi, I. Simon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) fulfill critical biological roles without having the potential to fold on their own. While lacking inherent structure, the majority of IDPs do reach a folded state via interaction with a protein partner, presenting a deep entanglement of the folding and binding processes. Protein disorder has been recognized as a major determinant in several properties of proteins, such as sequence, adopted structure upon binding and function. However, the way the binding process is reflected in these features in general lacks a detailed description. Here, we defined three categories of protein complexes depending on the unbound structural state of the interactors and analyzed them in detail. We found that strikingly, the properties of interactors in terms of sequence and adopted structure are defined not only by the intrinsic structural state of the protein itself but also to a comparable extent by the structural state of the binding partner. The three different types of interactions are also regulated through divergent molecular tactics of post-translational modifications. This not only widens the range of biologically relevant sequence and structure spaces defined by ordered proteins but also presents distinct molecular mechanisms compatible with specific biological processes, separately for each interaction type. The distinct attributes of different binding modes identified in this study can help to understand how various types of interactions serve as building blocks for the assembly of tightly regulated and highly intertwined regulatory networks.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of molecular biology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Proteins
Biological Phenomena
Post Translational Protein Processing

Keywords

  • coupled folding and binding
  • intrinsically disordered proteins
  • mutual synergistic folding
  • protein–protein interactions
  • regulatory networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Sequential, Structural and Functional Properties of Protein Complexes Are Defined by How Folding and Binding Intertwine. / Mészáros, Bálint; Dobson, László; Fichó, Erzsébet; Tusnády, G.; Dosztányi, Z.; Simon, I.

In: Journal of molecular biology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fd5a6e6f04794370a463219087faaab9,
title = "Sequential, Structural and Functional Properties of Protein Complexes Are Defined by How Folding and Binding Intertwine",
abstract = "Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) fulfill critical biological roles without having the potential to fold on their own. While lacking inherent structure, the majority of IDPs do reach a folded state via interaction with a protein partner, presenting a deep entanglement of the folding and binding processes. Protein disorder has been recognized as a major determinant in several properties of proteins, such as sequence, adopted structure upon binding and function. However, the way the binding process is reflected in these features in general lacks a detailed description. Here, we defined three categories of protein complexes depending on the unbound structural state of the interactors and analyzed them in detail. We found that strikingly, the properties of interactors in terms of sequence and adopted structure are defined not only by the intrinsic structural state of the protein itself but also to a comparable extent by the structural state of the binding partner. The three different types of interactions are also regulated through divergent molecular tactics of post-translational modifications. This not only widens the range of biologically relevant sequence and structure spaces defined by ordered proteins but also presents distinct molecular mechanisms compatible with specific biological processes, separately for each interaction type. The distinct attributes of different binding modes identified in this study can help to understand how various types of interactions serve as building blocks for the assembly of tightly regulated and highly intertwined regulatory networks.",
keywords = "coupled folding and binding, intrinsically disordered proteins, mutual synergistic folding, protein–protein interactions, regulatory networks",
author = "B{\'a}lint M{\'e}sz{\'a}ros and L{\'a}szl{\'o} Dobson and Erzs{\'e}bet Fich{\'o} and G. Tusn{\'a}dy and Z. Doszt{\'a}nyi and I. Simon",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmb.2019.07.034",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Molecular Biology",
issn = "0022-2836",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sequential, Structural and Functional Properties of Protein Complexes Are Defined by How Folding and Binding Intertwine

AU - Mészáros, Bálint

AU - Dobson, László

AU - Fichó, Erzsébet

AU - Tusnády, G.

AU - Dosztányi, Z.

AU - Simon, I.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) fulfill critical biological roles without having the potential to fold on their own. While lacking inherent structure, the majority of IDPs do reach a folded state via interaction with a protein partner, presenting a deep entanglement of the folding and binding processes. Protein disorder has been recognized as a major determinant in several properties of proteins, such as sequence, adopted structure upon binding and function. However, the way the binding process is reflected in these features in general lacks a detailed description. Here, we defined three categories of protein complexes depending on the unbound structural state of the interactors and analyzed them in detail. We found that strikingly, the properties of interactors in terms of sequence and adopted structure are defined not only by the intrinsic structural state of the protein itself but also to a comparable extent by the structural state of the binding partner. The three different types of interactions are also regulated through divergent molecular tactics of post-translational modifications. This not only widens the range of biologically relevant sequence and structure spaces defined by ordered proteins but also presents distinct molecular mechanisms compatible with specific biological processes, separately for each interaction type. The distinct attributes of different binding modes identified in this study can help to understand how various types of interactions serve as building blocks for the assembly of tightly regulated and highly intertwined regulatory networks.

AB - Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) fulfill critical biological roles without having the potential to fold on their own. While lacking inherent structure, the majority of IDPs do reach a folded state via interaction with a protein partner, presenting a deep entanglement of the folding and binding processes. Protein disorder has been recognized as a major determinant in several properties of proteins, such as sequence, adopted structure upon binding and function. However, the way the binding process is reflected in these features in general lacks a detailed description. Here, we defined three categories of protein complexes depending on the unbound structural state of the interactors and analyzed them in detail. We found that strikingly, the properties of interactors in terms of sequence and adopted structure are defined not only by the intrinsic structural state of the protein itself but also to a comparable extent by the structural state of the binding partner. The three different types of interactions are also regulated through divergent molecular tactics of post-translational modifications. This not only widens the range of biologically relevant sequence and structure spaces defined by ordered proteins but also presents distinct molecular mechanisms compatible with specific biological processes, separately for each interaction type. The distinct attributes of different binding modes identified in this study can help to understand how various types of interactions serve as building blocks for the assembly of tightly regulated and highly intertwined regulatory networks.

KW - coupled folding and binding

KW - intrinsically disordered proteins

KW - mutual synergistic folding

KW - protein–protein interactions

KW - regulatory networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071292588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071292588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.07.034

DO - 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.07.034

M3 - Article

C2 - 31415767

AN - SCOPUS:85071292588

JO - Journal of Molecular Biology

JF - Journal of Molecular Biology

SN - 0022-2836

ER -