Sensitivity analysis of respiratory parameter estimates in the constant-phase model

Cindy Thamrin, Tibor Z. Jánosi, Rachel A. Collins, Peter D. Sly, Z. Hantos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The constant-phase model is increasingly used to fit low-frequency respiratory input impedance (Zrs), highlighting the need for a better understanding of the use of the model. Of particular interest is the extent to which Zrs would be affected by changes in parameters of the model, and conversely, how reliable are parameters estimated from model fits to the measured Zrs. We performed sensitivity analysis on respiratory data from 6 adult mice, at functional residual capacity (FRC), total lung capacity (TLC), and during bronchoconstriction, obtained using a 1-25 Hz oscillatory signal. The partial derivatives of Zrs with respect to each parameter were first examined. The limits of the 95% confidence intervals, 2-dimensional pairwise and p-dimensional joint confidence regions were then calculated. It was found that airway resistance was better estimated at FRC, as determined by the confidence region limits, whereas tissue damping and elastance were better estimated at TLC. Airway inertance was poorly estimated at this frequency range, as expected. During methacholine-evoked pulmonary constriction, there was an increase in the uncertainty of airway resistance and tissue damping, but this can be compensated for by using the relative (weighted residuals) in preference over the absolute (unweighted residuals) fitting criterion. These results are consistent with experimental observation and physiological understanding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)815-822
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Biomedical Engineering
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2004

Fingerprint

Sensitivity analysis
Damping
Tissue
Derivatives

Keywords

  • Forced oscillation
  • Joint variabilities
  • Parameter estimation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Sensitivity analysis of respiratory parameter estimates in the constant-phase model. / Thamrin, Cindy; Jánosi, Tibor Z.; Collins, Rachel A.; Sly, Peter D.; Hantos, Z.

In: Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 6, 06.2004, p. 815-822.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thamrin, Cindy ; Jánosi, Tibor Z. ; Collins, Rachel A. ; Sly, Peter D. ; Hantos, Z. / Sensitivity analysis of respiratory parameter estimates in the constant-phase model. In: Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2004 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 815-822.
@article{786bbbf8be254ebda571aedf62e5deef,
title = "Sensitivity analysis of respiratory parameter estimates in the constant-phase model",
abstract = "The constant-phase model is increasingly used to fit low-frequency respiratory input impedance (Zrs), highlighting the need for a better understanding of the use of the model. Of particular interest is the extent to which Zrs would be affected by changes in parameters of the model, and conversely, how reliable are parameters estimated from model fits to the measured Zrs. We performed sensitivity analysis on respiratory data from 6 adult mice, at functional residual capacity (FRC), total lung capacity (TLC), and during bronchoconstriction, obtained using a 1-25 Hz oscillatory signal. The partial derivatives of Zrs with respect to each parameter were first examined. The limits of the 95{\%} confidence intervals, 2-dimensional pairwise and p-dimensional joint confidence regions were then calculated. It was found that airway resistance was better estimated at FRC, as determined by the confidence region limits, whereas tissue damping and elastance were better estimated at TLC. Airway inertance was poorly estimated at this frequency range, as expected. During methacholine-evoked pulmonary constriction, there was an increase in the uncertainty of airway resistance and tissue damping, but this can be compensated for by using the relative (weighted residuals) in preference over the absolute (unweighted residuals) fitting criterion. These results are consistent with experimental observation and physiological understanding.",
keywords = "Forced oscillation, Joint variabilities, Parameter estimation",
author = "Cindy Thamrin and J{\'a}nosi, {Tibor Z.} and Collins, {Rachel A.} and Sly, {Peter D.} and Z. Hantos",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1023/B:ABME.0000030257.88945.81",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "815--822",
journal = "Annals of Biomedical Engineering",
issn = "0090-6964",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity analysis of respiratory parameter estimates in the constant-phase model

AU - Thamrin, Cindy

AU - Jánosi, Tibor Z.

AU - Collins, Rachel A.

AU - Sly, Peter D.

AU - Hantos, Z.

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - The constant-phase model is increasingly used to fit low-frequency respiratory input impedance (Zrs), highlighting the need for a better understanding of the use of the model. Of particular interest is the extent to which Zrs would be affected by changes in parameters of the model, and conversely, how reliable are parameters estimated from model fits to the measured Zrs. We performed sensitivity analysis on respiratory data from 6 adult mice, at functional residual capacity (FRC), total lung capacity (TLC), and during bronchoconstriction, obtained using a 1-25 Hz oscillatory signal. The partial derivatives of Zrs with respect to each parameter were first examined. The limits of the 95% confidence intervals, 2-dimensional pairwise and p-dimensional joint confidence regions were then calculated. It was found that airway resistance was better estimated at FRC, as determined by the confidence region limits, whereas tissue damping and elastance were better estimated at TLC. Airway inertance was poorly estimated at this frequency range, as expected. During methacholine-evoked pulmonary constriction, there was an increase in the uncertainty of airway resistance and tissue damping, but this can be compensated for by using the relative (weighted residuals) in preference over the absolute (unweighted residuals) fitting criterion. These results are consistent with experimental observation and physiological understanding.

AB - The constant-phase model is increasingly used to fit low-frequency respiratory input impedance (Zrs), highlighting the need for a better understanding of the use of the model. Of particular interest is the extent to which Zrs would be affected by changes in parameters of the model, and conversely, how reliable are parameters estimated from model fits to the measured Zrs. We performed sensitivity analysis on respiratory data from 6 adult mice, at functional residual capacity (FRC), total lung capacity (TLC), and during bronchoconstriction, obtained using a 1-25 Hz oscillatory signal. The partial derivatives of Zrs with respect to each parameter were first examined. The limits of the 95% confidence intervals, 2-dimensional pairwise and p-dimensional joint confidence regions were then calculated. It was found that airway resistance was better estimated at FRC, as determined by the confidence region limits, whereas tissue damping and elastance were better estimated at TLC. Airway inertance was poorly estimated at this frequency range, as expected. During methacholine-evoked pulmonary constriction, there was an increase in the uncertainty of airway resistance and tissue damping, but this can be compensated for by using the relative (weighted residuals) in preference over the absolute (unweighted residuals) fitting criterion. These results are consistent with experimental observation and physiological understanding.

KW - Forced oscillation

KW - Joint variabilities

KW - Parameter estimation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16544372324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16544372324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/B:ABME.0000030257.88945.81

DO - 10.1023/B:ABME.0000030257.88945.81

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 815

EP - 822

JO - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

JF - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

SN - 0090-6964

IS - 6

ER -