Selectivity in analytical chemistry

Two interpretations for univariate methods

Zsanett Dorkó, Tatjana Verbić, G. Horvai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Selectivity is extremely important in analytical chemistry but its definition is elusive despite continued efforts by professional organizations and individual scientists. This paper shows that the existing selectivity concepts for univariate analytical methods broadly fall in two classes: selectivity concepts based on measurement error and concepts based on response surfaces (the response surface being the 3D plot of the univariate signal as a function of analyte and interferent concentration, respectively). The strengths and weaknesses of the different definitions are analyzed and contradictions between them unveiled. The error based selectivity is very general and very safe but its application to a range of samples (as opposed to a single sample) requires the knowledge of some constraint about the possible sample compositions. The selectivity concepts based on the response surface are easily applied to linear response surfaces but may lead to difficulties and counterintuitive results when applied to nonlinear response surfaces. A particular advantage of this class of selectivity is that with linear response surfaces it can provide a concentration independent measure of selectivity. In contrast, the error based selectivity concept allows only yes/no type decision about selectivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)680-684
Number of pages5
JournalTalanta
Volume132
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 15 2015

Fingerprint

Chemical analysis
Measurement errors

Keywords

  • Analytical method
  • Error
  • Interference
  • Selectivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

Selectivity in analytical chemistry : Two interpretations for univariate methods. / Dorkó, Zsanett; Verbić, Tatjana; Horvai, G.

In: Talanta, Vol. 132, 15.01.2015, p. 680-684.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dorkó, Zsanett ; Verbić, Tatjana ; Horvai, G. / Selectivity in analytical chemistry : Two interpretations for univariate methods. In: Talanta. 2015 ; Vol. 132. pp. 680-684.
@article{fcd0c8a4f893429f82e93fcbf6611a15,
title = "Selectivity in analytical chemistry: Two interpretations for univariate methods",
abstract = "Selectivity is extremely important in analytical chemistry but its definition is elusive despite continued efforts by professional organizations and individual scientists. This paper shows that the existing selectivity concepts for univariate analytical methods broadly fall in two classes: selectivity concepts based on measurement error and concepts based on response surfaces (the response surface being the 3D plot of the univariate signal as a function of analyte and interferent concentration, respectively). The strengths and weaknesses of the different definitions are analyzed and contradictions between them unveiled. The error based selectivity is very general and very safe but its application to a range of samples (as opposed to a single sample) requires the knowledge of some constraint about the possible sample compositions. The selectivity concepts based on the response surface are easily applied to linear response surfaces but may lead to difficulties and counterintuitive results when applied to nonlinear response surfaces. A particular advantage of this class of selectivity is that with linear response surfaces it can provide a concentration independent measure of selectivity. In contrast, the error based selectivity concept allows only yes/no type decision about selectivity.",
keywords = "Analytical method, Error, Interference, Selectivity",
author = "Zsanett Dork{\'o} and Tatjana Verbić and G. Horvai",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.talanta.2014.10.018",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "680--684",
journal = "Talanta",
issn = "0039-9140",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selectivity in analytical chemistry

T2 - Two interpretations for univariate methods

AU - Dorkó, Zsanett

AU - Verbić, Tatjana

AU - Horvai, G.

PY - 2015/1/15

Y1 - 2015/1/15

N2 - Selectivity is extremely important in analytical chemistry but its definition is elusive despite continued efforts by professional organizations and individual scientists. This paper shows that the existing selectivity concepts for univariate analytical methods broadly fall in two classes: selectivity concepts based on measurement error and concepts based on response surfaces (the response surface being the 3D plot of the univariate signal as a function of analyte and interferent concentration, respectively). The strengths and weaknesses of the different definitions are analyzed and contradictions between them unveiled. The error based selectivity is very general and very safe but its application to a range of samples (as opposed to a single sample) requires the knowledge of some constraint about the possible sample compositions. The selectivity concepts based on the response surface are easily applied to linear response surfaces but may lead to difficulties and counterintuitive results when applied to nonlinear response surfaces. A particular advantage of this class of selectivity is that with linear response surfaces it can provide a concentration independent measure of selectivity. In contrast, the error based selectivity concept allows only yes/no type decision about selectivity.

AB - Selectivity is extremely important in analytical chemistry but its definition is elusive despite continued efforts by professional organizations and individual scientists. This paper shows that the existing selectivity concepts for univariate analytical methods broadly fall in two classes: selectivity concepts based on measurement error and concepts based on response surfaces (the response surface being the 3D plot of the univariate signal as a function of analyte and interferent concentration, respectively). The strengths and weaknesses of the different definitions are analyzed and contradictions between them unveiled. The error based selectivity is very general and very safe but its application to a range of samples (as opposed to a single sample) requires the knowledge of some constraint about the possible sample compositions. The selectivity concepts based on the response surface are easily applied to linear response surfaces but may lead to difficulties and counterintuitive results when applied to nonlinear response surfaces. A particular advantage of this class of selectivity is that with linear response surfaces it can provide a concentration independent measure of selectivity. In contrast, the error based selectivity concept allows only yes/no type decision about selectivity.

KW - Analytical method

KW - Error

KW - Interference

KW - Selectivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910069908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910069908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.10.018

DO - 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.10.018

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 680

EP - 684

JO - Talanta

JF - Talanta

SN - 0039-9140

ER -