Scale-dependent effects of coppicing on the species pool of late successional beech forests in the central Apennines, Italy

Giandiego Campetella, Roberto Canullo, Alessandro Gimona, Janos Garadnai, Alessandro Chiarucci, Daniele Giorgini, Elia Angelini, Marco Cervellini, Stefano Chelli, S. Bartha, Martin Hermy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Question: We compared active and abandoned beech coppices in terms of: (1) structural features, (2) total, understorey and overstorey plant diversity across spatial scales, and (3) species richness of beech forest specialist species. Location: Central Apennines, Italy. Methods: We applied a multi-scale approach, working at fine scale (management unit) and at a coarser scale (forest patch). Two forest patches were selected according to management regimes (active coppicing, 1–40 yrs; abandoned coppicing, >40 yrs) in each of the two study areas (Bolognola and Ussita). Within each forest patch, 20 stands were sampled in 20 m × 20 m plots, for a total of 80 sampling units. Results: We found that the height of standards and number of dominant trees were negatively correlated with the total number of species. At the plot scale, the number of beech specialist species was significantly higher in abandoned plots. At the forest patch scale, the number of species in Bolognola was markedly higher in the actively coppiced forest than in the abandoned one, while the opposite result was found at Ussita. Regarding the beech specialist species richness, the abandoned forest at Ussita showed higher richness than the coppiced forest, while in Bolognola we found the opposite. The managed forest hosted more overstorey species than the abandoned one in both areas. Surprisingly, at forest patch scale in Bolognola, the total beech specialist species richness was higher in the coppiced plots than in the abandoned ones. The species assemblages were more similar between patches having different management regimes within the same area, than between patches having the same management regime across different areas. Conclusions: This material provides a novel contribution to the study of species diversity patterns in this forest system, suggesting the importance of a multiple scale approach in forest diversity studies. The beech specialist species can largely persist in a heterogeneous coppice landscape, where abandoned stands are mixed with stands under regular coppicing. The results can link current knowledge about beech coppice diversity on the landscape scale with that on the plot scale, and thus help guide new conservation planning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)474-485
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Vegetation Science
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

species pool
coppice
species richness
effect
conservation planning
understory
species diversity

Keywords

  • Central apennines
  • Forest stand structure
  • Landscape
  • Scale dependence
  • α-diversity
  • β-diversity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology

Cite this

Campetella, G., Canullo, R., Gimona, A., Garadnai, J., Chiarucci, A., Giorgini, D., ... Hermy, M. (2016). Scale-dependent effects of coppicing on the species pool of late successional beech forests in the central Apennines, Italy. Applied Vegetation Science, 19(3), 474-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12235

Scale-dependent effects of coppicing on the species pool of late successional beech forests in the central Apennines, Italy. / Campetella, Giandiego; Canullo, Roberto; Gimona, Alessandro; Garadnai, Janos; Chiarucci, Alessandro; Giorgini, Daniele; Angelini, Elia; Cervellini, Marco; Chelli, Stefano; Bartha, S.; Hermy, Martin.

In: Applied Vegetation Science, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.07.2016, p. 474-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Campetella, G, Canullo, R, Gimona, A, Garadnai, J, Chiarucci, A, Giorgini, D, Angelini, E, Cervellini, M, Chelli, S, Bartha, S & Hermy, M 2016, 'Scale-dependent effects of coppicing on the species pool of late successional beech forests in the central Apennines, Italy', Applied Vegetation Science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 474-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12235
Campetella, Giandiego ; Canullo, Roberto ; Gimona, Alessandro ; Garadnai, Janos ; Chiarucci, Alessandro ; Giorgini, Daniele ; Angelini, Elia ; Cervellini, Marco ; Chelli, Stefano ; Bartha, S. ; Hermy, Martin. / Scale-dependent effects of coppicing on the species pool of late successional beech forests in the central Apennines, Italy. In: Applied Vegetation Science. 2016 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 474-485.
@article{c1b7f4b4bd1d4823857416b4b6ee54d1,
title = "Scale-dependent effects of coppicing on the species pool of late successional beech forests in the central Apennines, Italy",
abstract = "Question: We compared active and abandoned beech coppices in terms of: (1) structural features, (2) total, understorey and overstorey plant diversity across spatial scales, and (3) species richness of beech forest specialist species. Location: Central Apennines, Italy. Methods: We applied a multi-scale approach, working at fine scale (management unit) and at a coarser scale (forest patch). Two forest patches were selected according to management regimes (active coppicing, 1–40 yrs; abandoned coppicing, >40 yrs) in each of the two study areas (Bolognola and Ussita). Within each forest patch, 20 stands were sampled in 20 m × 20 m plots, for a total of 80 sampling units. Results: We found that the height of standards and number of dominant trees were negatively correlated with the total number of species. At the plot scale, the number of beech specialist species was significantly higher in abandoned plots. At the forest patch scale, the number of species in Bolognola was markedly higher in the actively coppiced forest than in the abandoned one, while the opposite result was found at Ussita. Regarding the beech specialist species richness, the abandoned forest at Ussita showed higher richness than the coppiced forest, while in Bolognola we found the opposite. The managed forest hosted more overstorey species than the abandoned one in both areas. Surprisingly, at forest patch scale in Bolognola, the total beech specialist species richness was higher in the coppiced plots than in the abandoned ones. The species assemblages were more similar between patches having different management regimes within the same area, than between patches having the same management regime across different areas. Conclusions: This material provides a novel contribution to the study of species diversity patterns in this forest system, suggesting the importance of a multiple scale approach in forest diversity studies. The beech specialist species can largely persist in a heterogeneous coppice landscape, where abandoned stands are mixed with stands under regular coppicing. The results can link current knowledge about beech coppice diversity on the landscape scale with that on the plot scale, and thus help guide new conservation planning.",
keywords = "Central apennines, Forest stand structure, Landscape, Scale dependence, α-diversity, β-diversity",
author = "Giandiego Campetella and Roberto Canullo and Alessandro Gimona and Janos Garadnai and Alessandro Chiarucci and Daniele Giorgini and Elia Angelini and Marco Cervellini and Stefano Chelli and S. Bartha and Martin Hermy",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/avsc.12235",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "474--485",
journal = "Applied Vegetation Science",
issn = "1402-2001",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scale-dependent effects of coppicing on the species pool of late successional beech forests in the central Apennines, Italy

AU - Campetella, Giandiego

AU - Canullo, Roberto

AU - Gimona, Alessandro

AU - Garadnai, Janos

AU - Chiarucci, Alessandro

AU - Giorgini, Daniele

AU - Angelini, Elia

AU - Cervellini, Marco

AU - Chelli, Stefano

AU - Bartha, S.

AU - Hermy, Martin

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Question: We compared active and abandoned beech coppices in terms of: (1) structural features, (2) total, understorey and overstorey plant diversity across spatial scales, and (3) species richness of beech forest specialist species. Location: Central Apennines, Italy. Methods: We applied a multi-scale approach, working at fine scale (management unit) and at a coarser scale (forest patch). Two forest patches were selected according to management regimes (active coppicing, 1–40 yrs; abandoned coppicing, >40 yrs) in each of the two study areas (Bolognola and Ussita). Within each forest patch, 20 stands were sampled in 20 m × 20 m plots, for a total of 80 sampling units. Results: We found that the height of standards and number of dominant trees were negatively correlated with the total number of species. At the plot scale, the number of beech specialist species was significantly higher in abandoned plots. At the forest patch scale, the number of species in Bolognola was markedly higher in the actively coppiced forest than in the abandoned one, while the opposite result was found at Ussita. Regarding the beech specialist species richness, the abandoned forest at Ussita showed higher richness than the coppiced forest, while in Bolognola we found the opposite. The managed forest hosted more overstorey species than the abandoned one in both areas. Surprisingly, at forest patch scale in Bolognola, the total beech specialist species richness was higher in the coppiced plots than in the abandoned ones. The species assemblages were more similar between patches having different management regimes within the same area, than between patches having the same management regime across different areas. Conclusions: This material provides a novel contribution to the study of species diversity patterns in this forest system, suggesting the importance of a multiple scale approach in forest diversity studies. The beech specialist species can largely persist in a heterogeneous coppice landscape, where abandoned stands are mixed with stands under regular coppicing. The results can link current knowledge about beech coppice diversity on the landscape scale with that on the plot scale, and thus help guide new conservation planning.

AB - Question: We compared active and abandoned beech coppices in terms of: (1) structural features, (2) total, understorey and overstorey plant diversity across spatial scales, and (3) species richness of beech forest specialist species. Location: Central Apennines, Italy. Methods: We applied a multi-scale approach, working at fine scale (management unit) and at a coarser scale (forest patch). Two forest patches were selected according to management regimes (active coppicing, 1–40 yrs; abandoned coppicing, >40 yrs) in each of the two study areas (Bolognola and Ussita). Within each forest patch, 20 stands were sampled in 20 m × 20 m plots, for a total of 80 sampling units. Results: We found that the height of standards and number of dominant trees were negatively correlated with the total number of species. At the plot scale, the number of beech specialist species was significantly higher in abandoned plots. At the forest patch scale, the number of species in Bolognola was markedly higher in the actively coppiced forest than in the abandoned one, while the opposite result was found at Ussita. Regarding the beech specialist species richness, the abandoned forest at Ussita showed higher richness than the coppiced forest, while in Bolognola we found the opposite. The managed forest hosted more overstorey species than the abandoned one in both areas. Surprisingly, at forest patch scale in Bolognola, the total beech specialist species richness was higher in the coppiced plots than in the abandoned ones. The species assemblages were more similar between patches having different management regimes within the same area, than between patches having the same management regime across different areas. Conclusions: This material provides a novel contribution to the study of species diversity patterns in this forest system, suggesting the importance of a multiple scale approach in forest diversity studies. The beech specialist species can largely persist in a heterogeneous coppice landscape, where abandoned stands are mixed with stands under regular coppicing. The results can link current knowledge about beech coppice diversity on the landscape scale with that on the plot scale, and thus help guide new conservation planning.

KW - Central apennines

KW - Forest stand structure

KW - Landscape

KW - Scale dependence

KW - α-diversity

KW - β-diversity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973124664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973124664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/avsc.12235

DO - 10.1111/avsc.12235

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 474

EP - 485

JO - Applied Vegetation Science

JF - Applied Vegetation Science

SN - 1402-2001

IS - 3

ER -