Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science

Jochen Gläser, Wolfgang Glänzel, Andrea Scharnhorst

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Science studies are persistently challenged by the elusive structures of their subject matter, be it scientific knowledge or the various collectivities of researchers engaged with its production. Bibliometrics has responded by developing a strong and growing structural bibliometrics, which is concerned with delineating fields and identifying thematic structures. In the course of these developments, a concern emerged and is steadily growing. Do the sets of publications, authors or institutions we identify and visualise with our methods indeed represent thematic structures? To what extent are results of topic identification exercises determined by properties of knowledge structures, and to what extent are they determined by the approaches we use? Do we produce more than artefacts? These questions triggered the collective process of comparative topic identification reported in this special issue. The introduction traces the history of bibliometric approaches to topic identification, identifies the major challenges involved in these exercises, and introduces the contributions to the special issue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)981-998
Number of pages18
JournalScientometrics
Volume111
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this