Reply to "Comments on the paper entitled 'The formulation and modelling of the anodic dissolution of zinc through adsorbed intermediates' " by C. Cachet et al.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The points raised in the paper entitled "Comments on the paper entitled 'The formulation and modelling of the anodic dissolution of zinc through adsorbed intermediates"' have been discussed. It has been shown that, in contrast to the statements in the "Comments", most of the papers concerning the reaction schemes suggested for the interpretation of the dissolution or deposition of metals, which were considered as a support for the opinion of the Authors of the "Comments", support the views expressed in our original paper [J. Electroanal. Chem. 583 (2005) 148]. On the other hand, it has been stressed again that the criticism expressed in the original paper refers to dubious conclusions drawn on the basis of transient measurements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)372-374
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Volume600
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 15 2007

Keywords

  • EIS
  • EQCM
  • Ion adsorption
  • Kinetics
  • Zinc dissolution mechanism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Electrochemistry

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to "Comments on the paper entitled 'The formulation and modelling of the anodic dissolution of zinc through adsorbed intermediates' " by C. Cachet et al.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this