Rensch’s rule in avian lice

contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism

Imre Sándor Piross, Andrea Harnos, L. Rózsa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Rensch’s rule (RR) postulates that in comparisons across closely related species, male body size relative to female size increases with the average size of the species. This holds true in several vertebrate and also in certain free-living invertebrate taxa. Here, we document the validity of RR in avian lice using three families (Philopteridae, Menoponidae, and Ricinidae). Using published data on the body length of 989 louse species, subspecies, or distinct intraspecific lineages, we applied phylogenetic reduced major axis regression to analyse the body size of females vs. males while accounting for phylogenetic non-independence. Our results indicate that philopterid and menoponid lice follow RR, while ricinids exhibit the opposite pattern. In the case of philopterids and menoponids, we argue that larger-bodied bird species tend to host lice that are both larger in size and more abundant. Thus, sexual selection acting on males makes them relatively larger, and this is stronger than fecundity selection acting on females. Ricinids exhibit converse RR, likely because fecundity selection is stronger in their case.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7908
JournalScientific reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2019

Fingerprint

Phthiraptera
Sex Characteristics
Body Size
Fertility
Invertebrates
Birds
Vertebrates
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Rensch’s rule in avian lice : contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism. / Piross, Imre Sándor; Harnos, Andrea; Rózsa, L.

In: Scientific reports, Vol. 9, No. 1, 7908, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0dd541ee674249ff8dfaf6f6ea882fae,
title = "Rensch’s rule in avian lice: contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism",
abstract = "Rensch’s rule (RR) postulates that in comparisons across closely related species, male body size relative to female size increases with the average size of the species. This holds true in several vertebrate and also in certain free-living invertebrate taxa. Here, we document the validity of RR in avian lice using three families (Philopteridae, Menoponidae, and Ricinidae). Using published data on the body length of 989 louse species, subspecies, or distinct intraspecific lineages, we applied phylogenetic reduced major axis regression to analyse the body size of females vs. males while accounting for phylogenetic non-independence. Our results indicate that philopterid and menoponid lice follow RR, while ricinids exhibit the opposite pattern. In the case of philopterids and menoponids, we argue that larger-bodied bird species tend to host lice that are both larger in size and more abundant. Thus, sexual selection acting on males makes them relatively larger, and this is stronger than fecundity selection acting on females. Ricinids exhibit converse RR, likely because fecundity selection is stronger in their case.",
author = "Piross, {Imre S{\'a}ndor} and Andrea Harnos and L. R{\'o}zsa",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-019-44370-5",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rensch’s rule in avian lice

T2 - contradictory allometric trends for sexual size dimorphism

AU - Piross, Imre Sándor

AU - Harnos, Andrea

AU - Rózsa, L.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Rensch’s rule (RR) postulates that in comparisons across closely related species, male body size relative to female size increases with the average size of the species. This holds true in several vertebrate and also in certain free-living invertebrate taxa. Here, we document the validity of RR in avian lice using three families (Philopteridae, Menoponidae, and Ricinidae). Using published data on the body length of 989 louse species, subspecies, or distinct intraspecific lineages, we applied phylogenetic reduced major axis regression to analyse the body size of females vs. males while accounting for phylogenetic non-independence. Our results indicate that philopterid and menoponid lice follow RR, while ricinids exhibit the opposite pattern. In the case of philopterids and menoponids, we argue that larger-bodied bird species tend to host lice that are both larger in size and more abundant. Thus, sexual selection acting on males makes them relatively larger, and this is stronger than fecundity selection acting on females. Ricinids exhibit converse RR, likely because fecundity selection is stronger in their case.

AB - Rensch’s rule (RR) postulates that in comparisons across closely related species, male body size relative to female size increases with the average size of the species. This holds true in several vertebrate and also in certain free-living invertebrate taxa. Here, we document the validity of RR in avian lice using three families (Philopteridae, Menoponidae, and Ricinidae). Using published data on the body length of 989 louse species, subspecies, or distinct intraspecific lineages, we applied phylogenetic reduced major axis regression to analyse the body size of females vs. males while accounting for phylogenetic non-independence. Our results indicate that philopterid and menoponid lice follow RR, while ricinids exhibit the opposite pattern. In the case of philopterids and menoponids, we argue that larger-bodied bird species tend to host lice that are both larger in size and more abundant. Thus, sexual selection acting on males makes them relatively larger, and this is stronger than fecundity selection acting on females. Ricinids exhibit converse RR, likely because fecundity selection is stronger in their case.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067069778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067069778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-019-44370-5

DO - 10.1038/s41598-019-44370-5

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 7908

ER -