Refinement of Housner’s model on rocking blocks

Tamás Ther, L. Kollar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Housner published a simple model for the rocking block more than five decades ago (Housner in Bull Seismol Soc Am 53:403–417, 1963), which is widely used also for modeling stone and masonry columns and arches. In this paper we investigate the reasons of the well-known fact that experiments show lower energy loss during impact than it is predicted by Housner’s model. It was found that a reasonable explanation for the difference is that in the original model the best case scenario was assumed: that impact occurs at the edges, which results in the maximum energy loss. In reality, due to the unevenness of the surfaces, or due to the presence of aggregates between the interfaces, rocking may occur with consecutive impacts, which reduces the energy loss. This hypothesis was also verified by experiments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalBulletin of Earthquake Engineering
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Nov 18 2016

Fingerprint

Energy dissipation
energy dissipation
masonry
energy
arches
Arches
arch
experiment
Experiments
rocks
modeling
loss
stone

Keywords

  • Housner
  • Impact
  • Rigid block
  • Rocking block

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Geophysics

Cite this

Refinement of Housner’s model on rocking blocks. / Ther, Tamás; Kollar, L.

In: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18.11.2016, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4770fffaf1d6486e9519e98d4b841234,
title = "Refinement of Housner’s model on rocking blocks",
abstract = "Housner published a simple model for the rocking block more than five decades ago (Housner in Bull Seismol Soc Am 53:403–417, 1963), which is widely used also for modeling stone and masonry columns and arches. In this paper we investigate the reasons of the well-known fact that experiments show lower energy loss during impact than it is predicted by Housner’s model. It was found that a reasonable explanation for the difference is that in the original model the best case scenario was assumed: that impact occurs at the edges, which results in the maximum energy loss. In reality, due to the unevenness of the surfaces, or due to the presence of aggregates between the interfaces, rocking may occur with consecutive impacts, which reduces the energy loss. This hypothesis was also verified by experiments.",
keywords = "Housner, Impact, Rigid block, Rocking block",
author = "Tam{\'a}s Ther and L. Kollar",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s10518-016-0048-8",
language = "English",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering",
issn = "1570-761X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refinement of Housner’s model on rocking blocks

AU - Ther, Tamás

AU - Kollar, L.

PY - 2016/11/18

Y1 - 2016/11/18

N2 - Housner published a simple model for the rocking block more than five decades ago (Housner in Bull Seismol Soc Am 53:403–417, 1963), which is widely used also for modeling stone and masonry columns and arches. In this paper we investigate the reasons of the well-known fact that experiments show lower energy loss during impact than it is predicted by Housner’s model. It was found that a reasonable explanation for the difference is that in the original model the best case scenario was assumed: that impact occurs at the edges, which results in the maximum energy loss. In reality, due to the unevenness of the surfaces, or due to the presence of aggregates between the interfaces, rocking may occur with consecutive impacts, which reduces the energy loss. This hypothesis was also verified by experiments.

AB - Housner published a simple model for the rocking block more than five decades ago (Housner in Bull Seismol Soc Am 53:403–417, 1963), which is widely used also for modeling stone and masonry columns and arches. In this paper we investigate the reasons of the well-known fact that experiments show lower energy loss during impact than it is predicted by Housner’s model. It was found that a reasonable explanation for the difference is that in the original model the best case scenario was assumed: that impact occurs at the edges, which results in the maximum energy loss. In reality, due to the unevenness of the surfaces, or due to the presence of aggregates between the interfaces, rocking may occur with consecutive impacts, which reduces the energy loss. This hypothesis was also verified by experiments.

KW - Housner

KW - Impact

KW - Rigid block

KW - Rocking block

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995772061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995772061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10518-016-0048-8

DO - 10.1007/s10518-016-0048-8

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

JF - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

SN - 1570-761X

ER -