Quantifying irradiation defects in zirconium alloys

A comparison between transmission electron microscopy and whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis

L. Balogh, Fei Long, Zhongwen Yao, Michael Preuss, Mark R. Daymond

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Irradiation-induced dislocations significantly affect the mechanical properties of zirconium alloys, altering slip and influencing creep and growth. Thus, the quantitative characterization of irradiation defects as a function of fluence, cold work, and/or thermal treatments is important for models that attempt to predict their impact on properties. Whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis (DLPA) is a well-established modern tool for microstructure characterization based on first-principle physical models for dislocation density measurements in plastically deformed materials. However, applying these DLPA methods directly to irradiated materials yields higher than expected dislocation density values compared with historical transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements and past line-broadening analysis studies calibrated to TEM observations. In an effort to understand these differences, a new microstructural model was developed for DLPA to specifically address dislocation structures consisting of elliptical 〈a〉- and 〈c〉-component loops. To compare the refined DLPA method with TEM measurements, high-resolution neutron diffraction patterns on nonirradiated and irradiated Zr-2.5Nb samples were collected with the Neutron Powder Diffractometer instrument at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center and were evaluated. High-resolution TEM measurements were performed at the Reactor Materials Testing Laboratory, Queen's University, for comparison with the DLPA results. The capabilities and inherent uncertainties of both the refined DLPA and TEM methods are compared and discussed in detail. We show that the differences between the density values provided by DLPA and TEM are inherent to the methods and can be reconciled with the interpretation of the data.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationZirconium in the Nuclear Industry
Subtitle of host publication18th International Symposium
PublisherASTM International
Pages691-724
Number of pages34
VolumeSTP 1597
ISBN (Electronic)9780803176416
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018
Event18th International Symposium on Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry - Hilton Head, United States
Duration: May 15 2016May 19 2016

Other

Other18th International Symposium on Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry
CountryUnited States
CityHilton Head
Period5/15/165/19/16

Fingerprint

Zirconium alloys
Diffraction patterns
Diffraction
Irradiation
Transmission electron microscopy
Defects
Materials testing laboratories
Neutrons
Diffractometers
Neutron diffraction
High resolution transmission electron microscopy
Powders
Creep
Heat treatment
Mechanical properties
Microstructure

Keywords

  • Dislocation loops
  • Irradiation defects
  • TEM
  • X-ray diffraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Balogh, L., Long, F., Yao, Z., Preuss, M., & Daymond, M. R. (2018). Quantifying irradiation defects in zirconium alloys: A comparison between transmission electron microscopy and whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis. In Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 18th International Symposium (Vol. STP 1597, pp. 691-724). ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP159720160089

Quantifying irradiation defects in zirconium alloys : A comparison between transmission electron microscopy and whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis. / Balogh, L.; Long, Fei; Yao, Zhongwen; Preuss, Michael; Daymond, Mark R.

Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 18th International Symposium. Vol. STP 1597 ASTM International, 2018. p. 691-724.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Balogh, L, Long, F, Yao, Z, Preuss, M & Daymond, MR 2018, Quantifying irradiation defects in zirconium alloys: A comparison between transmission electron microscopy and whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis. in Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 18th International Symposium. vol. STP 1597, ASTM International, pp. 691-724, 18th International Symposium on Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry, Hilton Head, United States, 5/15/16. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP159720160089
Balogh L, Long F, Yao Z, Preuss M, Daymond MR. Quantifying irradiation defects in zirconium alloys: A comparison between transmission electron microscopy and whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis. In Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 18th International Symposium. Vol. STP 1597. ASTM International. 2018. p. 691-724 https://doi.org/10.1520/STP159720160089
Balogh, L. ; Long, Fei ; Yao, Zhongwen ; Preuss, Michael ; Daymond, Mark R. / Quantifying irradiation defects in zirconium alloys : A comparison between transmission electron microscopy and whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis. Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 18th International Symposium. Vol. STP 1597 ASTM International, 2018. pp. 691-724
@inproceedings{7c7cf3a7f49e40cd92595dd690cb3dd3,
title = "Quantifying irradiation defects in zirconium alloys: A comparison between transmission electron microscopy and whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis",
abstract = "Irradiation-induced dislocations significantly affect the mechanical properties of zirconium alloys, altering slip and influencing creep and growth. Thus, the quantitative characterization of irradiation defects as a function of fluence, cold work, and/or thermal treatments is important for models that attempt to predict their impact on properties. Whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis (DLPA) is a well-established modern tool for microstructure characterization based on first-principle physical models for dislocation density measurements in plastically deformed materials. However, applying these DLPA methods directly to irradiated materials yields higher than expected dislocation density values compared with historical transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements and past line-broadening analysis studies calibrated to TEM observations. In an effort to understand these differences, a new microstructural model was developed for DLPA to specifically address dislocation structures consisting of elliptical 〈a〉- and 〈c〉-component loops. To compare the refined DLPA method with TEM measurements, high-resolution neutron diffraction patterns on nonirradiated and irradiated Zr-2.5Nb samples were collected with the Neutron Powder Diffractometer instrument at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center and were evaluated. High-resolution TEM measurements were performed at the Reactor Materials Testing Laboratory, Queen's University, for comparison with the DLPA results. The capabilities and inherent uncertainties of both the refined DLPA and TEM methods are compared and discussed in detail. We show that the differences between the density values provided by DLPA and TEM are inherent to the methods and can be reconciled with the interpretation of the data.",
keywords = "Dislocation loops, Irradiation defects, TEM, X-ray diffraction",
author = "L. Balogh and Fei Long and Zhongwen Yao and Michael Preuss and Daymond, {Mark R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1520/STP159720160089",
language = "English",
volume = "STP 1597",
pages = "691--724",
booktitle = "Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry",
publisher = "ASTM International",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Quantifying irradiation defects in zirconium alloys

T2 - A comparison between transmission electron microscopy and whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis

AU - Balogh, L.

AU - Long, Fei

AU - Yao, Zhongwen

AU - Preuss, Michael

AU - Daymond, Mark R.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Irradiation-induced dislocations significantly affect the mechanical properties of zirconium alloys, altering slip and influencing creep and growth. Thus, the quantitative characterization of irradiation defects as a function of fluence, cold work, and/or thermal treatments is important for models that attempt to predict their impact on properties. Whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis (DLPA) is a well-established modern tool for microstructure characterization based on first-principle physical models for dislocation density measurements in plastically deformed materials. However, applying these DLPA methods directly to irradiated materials yields higher than expected dislocation density values compared with historical transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements and past line-broadening analysis studies calibrated to TEM observations. In an effort to understand these differences, a new microstructural model was developed for DLPA to specifically address dislocation structures consisting of elliptical 〈a〉- and 〈c〉-component loops. To compare the refined DLPA method with TEM measurements, high-resolution neutron diffraction patterns on nonirradiated and irradiated Zr-2.5Nb samples were collected with the Neutron Powder Diffractometer instrument at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center and were evaluated. High-resolution TEM measurements were performed at the Reactor Materials Testing Laboratory, Queen's University, for comparison with the DLPA results. The capabilities and inherent uncertainties of both the refined DLPA and TEM methods are compared and discussed in detail. We show that the differences between the density values provided by DLPA and TEM are inherent to the methods and can be reconciled with the interpretation of the data.

AB - Irradiation-induced dislocations significantly affect the mechanical properties of zirconium alloys, altering slip and influencing creep and growth. Thus, the quantitative characterization of irradiation defects as a function of fluence, cold work, and/or thermal treatments is important for models that attempt to predict their impact on properties. Whole-pattern diffraction line-profile analysis (DLPA) is a well-established modern tool for microstructure characterization based on first-principle physical models for dislocation density measurements in plastically deformed materials. However, applying these DLPA methods directly to irradiated materials yields higher than expected dislocation density values compared with historical transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements and past line-broadening analysis studies calibrated to TEM observations. In an effort to understand these differences, a new microstructural model was developed for DLPA to specifically address dislocation structures consisting of elliptical 〈a〉- and 〈c〉-component loops. To compare the refined DLPA method with TEM measurements, high-resolution neutron diffraction patterns on nonirradiated and irradiated Zr-2.5Nb samples were collected with the Neutron Powder Diffractometer instrument at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center and were evaluated. High-resolution TEM measurements were performed at the Reactor Materials Testing Laboratory, Queen's University, for comparison with the DLPA results. The capabilities and inherent uncertainties of both the refined DLPA and TEM methods are compared and discussed in detail. We show that the differences between the density values provided by DLPA and TEM are inherent to the methods and can be reconciled with the interpretation of the data.

KW - Dislocation loops

KW - Irradiation defects

KW - TEM

KW - X-ray diffraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050286272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050286272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1520/STP159720160089

DO - 10.1520/STP159720160089

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - STP 1597

SP - 691

EP - 724

BT - Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry

PB - ASTM International

ER -