Primary-care physicians' views about the use of home/self blood pressure monitoring

Nationwide survey in Hungary

A. Tislér, Andrea Dunai, András Keszei, Bertalan Fekete, Taha El Hadj Othmane, Péter Torzsa, Alexander G. Logan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To obtain unbiased views of primary-care physicians about home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). METHODS: A mail survey was conducted in a random sample (n = 700) of all Hungarian primary-care physicians (n = 5112). Items in the questionnaire related to the extent and indications for use of HBPM, to the significance attributed to its results, to the methods of its use, and to concerns physicians had with HBPM. RESULTS: Of the 700 questionnaires, 405 (58%) could be analysed. HBPM was popular among the respondents: 60% of them had more then 50 patients on HBPM, 90% of them were recommending its use either 'often' or 'almost all the time', and 75% of them considered the results of HBPM of either 'considerable' or of 'extreme importance'. The most frequent indications for use were white-coat hypertension (97%), assessing 24-h drug effects (87%), improving compliance (82%), suspicion of hypotension (63%), and resistant hypertension (61%). Physicians actively recommended devices with an upper-arm cuff (83%), equipped with a built in memory (63%). Most respondents (67%) had someone in their offices to teach the patient the correct measurement technique. Surprisingly, 65% of the physicians only reviewed the data to obtain a 'general picture' and did not analyse the data. Most of the respondents (78%) encouraged their patients to call their offices, and 90% of them did receive a call. Main concerns with HBPM were the use of non-validated devices (75%), and patient preoccupation with blood pressure (55%). Areas for suggested improvements were the need for patient training facilities (48%), established measurement protocols (44%) and better methods of displaying readings (30%). CONCLUSIONS: We found an unexpected popularity in the use of HBPM among primary-care physicians. In order to fully exploit the benefits of HBPM, the concerns raised (validated devices, patient preoccupation) and areas to be improved upon (patient training, better methods of displaying results) will have to be addressed by researchers, societies and the industry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1729-1735
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Hypertension
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2006

Fingerprint

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Hungary
Primary Care Physicians
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies
White Coat Hypertension
Surveys and Questionnaires
Postal Service
Hypotension
Compliance
Reading
Industry
Arm
Research Personnel
Blood Pressure
Hypertension

Keywords

  • Blood pressure measuring devices
  • Clinical use
  • Home blood pressure monitoring
  • Hypertension
  • Mail survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology

Cite this

Primary-care physicians' views about the use of home/self blood pressure monitoring : Nationwide survey in Hungary. / Tislér, A.; Dunai, Andrea; Keszei, András; Fekete, Bertalan; Othmane, Taha El Hadj; Torzsa, Péter; Logan, Alexander G.

In: Journal of Hypertension, Vol. 24, No. 9, 09.2006, p. 1729-1735.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tislér, A. ; Dunai, Andrea ; Keszei, András ; Fekete, Bertalan ; Othmane, Taha El Hadj ; Torzsa, Péter ; Logan, Alexander G. / Primary-care physicians' views about the use of home/self blood pressure monitoring : Nationwide survey in Hungary. In: Journal of Hypertension. 2006 ; Vol. 24, No. 9. pp. 1729-1735.
@article{74e45aee6b89431db67cfa839cd8fae2,
title = "Primary-care physicians' views about the use of home/self blood pressure monitoring: Nationwide survey in Hungary",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To obtain unbiased views of primary-care physicians about home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). METHODS: A mail survey was conducted in a random sample (n = 700) of all Hungarian primary-care physicians (n = 5112). Items in the questionnaire related to the extent and indications for use of HBPM, to the significance attributed to its results, to the methods of its use, and to concerns physicians had with HBPM. RESULTS: Of the 700 questionnaires, 405 (58{\%}) could be analysed. HBPM was popular among the respondents: 60{\%} of them had more then 50 patients on HBPM, 90{\%} of them were recommending its use either 'often' or 'almost all the time', and 75{\%} of them considered the results of HBPM of either 'considerable' or of 'extreme importance'. The most frequent indications for use were white-coat hypertension (97{\%}), assessing 24-h drug effects (87{\%}), improving compliance (82{\%}), suspicion of hypotension (63{\%}), and resistant hypertension (61{\%}). Physicians actively recommended devices with an upper-arm cuff (83{\%}), equipped with a built in memory (63{\%}). Most respondents (67{\%}) had someone in their offices to teach the patient the correct measurement technique. Surprisingly, 65{\%} of the physicians only reviewed the data to obtain a 'general picture' and did not analyse the data. Most of the respondents (78{\%}) encouraged their patients to call their offices, and 90{\%} of them did receive a call. Main concerns with HBPM were the use of non-validated devices (75{\%}), and patient preoccupation with blood pressure (55{\%}). Areas for suggested improvements were the need for patient training facilities (48{\%}), established measurement protocols (44{\%}) and better methods of displaying readings (30{\%}). CONCLUSIONS: We found an unexpected popularity in the use of HBPM among primary-care physicians. In order to fully exploit the benefits of HBPM, the concerns raised (validated devices, patient preoccupation) and areas to be improved upon (patient training, better methods of displaying results) will have to be addressed by researchers, societies and the industry.",
keywords = "Blood pressure measuring devices, Clinical use, Home blood pressure monitoring, Hypertension, Mail survey",
author = "A. Tisl{\'e}r and Andrea Dunai and Andr{\'a}s Keszei and Bertalan Fekete and Othmane, {Taha El Hadj} and P{\'e}ter Torzsa and Logan, {Alexander G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/01.hjh.0000242396.15097.f3",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1729--1735",
journal = "Journal of Hypertension",
issn = "0263-6352",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary-care physicians' views about the use of home/self blood pressure monitoring

T2 - Nationwide survey in Hungary

AU - Tislér, A.

AU - Dunai, Andrea

AU - Keszei, András

AU - Fekete, Bertalan

AU - Othmane, Taha El Hadj

AU - Torzsa, Péter

AU - Logan, Alexander G.

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To obtain unbiased views of primary-care physicians about home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). METHODS: A mail survey was conducted in a random sample (n = 700) of all Hungarian primary-care physicians (n = 5112). Items in the questionnaire related to the extent and indications for use of HBPM, to the significance attributed to its results, to the methods of its use, and to concerns physicians had with HBPM. RESULTS: Of the 700 questionnaires, 405 (58%) could be analysed. HBPM was popular among the respondents: 60% of them had more then 50 patients on HBPM, 90% of them were recommending its use either 'often' or 'almost all the time', and 75% of them considered the results of HBPM of either 'considerable' or of 'extreme importance'. The most frequent indications for use were white-coat hypertension (97%), assessing 24-h drug effects (87%), improving compliance (82%), suspicion of hypotension (63%), and resistant hypertension (61%). Physicians actively recommended devices with an upper-arm cuff (83%), equipped with a built in memory (63%). Most respondents (67%) had someone in their offices to teach the patient the correct measurement technique. Surprisingly, 65% of the physicians only reviewed the data to obtain a 'general picture' and did not analyse the data. Most of the respondents (78%) encouraged their patients to call their offices, and 90% of them did receive a call. Main concerns with HBPM were the use of non-validated devices (75%), and patient preoccupation with blood pressure (55%). Areas for suggested improvements were the need for patient training facilities (48%), established measurement protocols (44%) and better methods of displaying readings (30%). CONCLUSIONS: We found an unexpected popularity in the use of HBPM among primary-care physicians. In order to fully exploit the benefits of HBPM, the concerns raised (validated devices, patient preoccupation) and areas to be improved upon (patient training, better methods of displaying results) will have to be addressed by researchers, societies and the industry.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To obtain unbiased views of primary-care physicians about home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). METHODS: A mail survey was conducted in a random sample (n = 700) of all Hungarian primary-care physicians (n = 5112). Items in the questionnaire related to the extent and indications for use of HBPM, to the significance attributed to its results, to the methods of its use, and to concerns physicians had with HBPM. RESULTS: Of the 700 questionnaires, 405 (58%) could be analysed. HBPM was popular among the respondents: 60% of them had more then 50 patients on HBPM, 90% of them were recommending its use either 'often' or 'almost all the time', and 75% of them considered the results of HBPM of either 'considerable' or of 'extreme importance'. The most frequent indications for use were white-coat hypertension (97%), assessing 24-h drug effects (87%), improving compliance (82%), suspicion of hypotension (63%), and resistant hypertension (61%). Physicians actively recommended devices with an upper-arm cuff (83%), equipped with a built in memory (63%). Most respondents (67%) had someone in their offices to teach the patient the correct measurement technique. Surprisingly, 65% of the physicians only reviewed the data to obtain a 'general picture' and did not analyse the data. Most of the respondents (78%) encouraged their patients to call their offices, and 90% of them did receive a call. Main concerns with HBPM were the use of non-validated devices (75%), and patient preoccupation with blood pressure (55%). Areas for suggested improvements were the need for patient training facilities (48%), established measurement protocols (44%) and better methods of displaying readings (30%). CONCLUSIONS: We found an unexpected popularity in the use of HBPM among primary-care physicians. In order to fully exploit the benefits of HBPM, the concerns raised (validated devices, patient preoccupation) and areas to be improved upon (patient training, better methods of displaying results) will have to be addressed by researchers, societies and the industry.

KW - Blood pressure measuring devices

KW - Clinical use

KW - Home blood pressure monitoring

KW - Hypertension

KW - Mail survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747390486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747390486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.hjh.0000242396.15097.f3

DO - 10.1097/01.hjh.0000242396.15097.f3

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1729

EP - 1735

JO - Journal of Hypertension

JF - Journal of Hypertension

SN - 0263-6352

IS - 9

ER -