Practical value of the complex analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinomas

Simona Gurzu, I. Jung, T. Bara, T. Bara, Z. Szentirmay, L. Azamfirei, Erika Tóth, M. Turcu, Em Egyed-Zsigmond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite modern factors, which seem to predict outcome, lymph node (LN) status remain the main prognostic factor, which also shows the need for complex oncotherapy in colorectal carcinomas (CRC). Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) mapping is a very controversial method, which can increase the number of identified LN. Materials and Methods: In 28 patients who underwent surgical intervention between December 2009 and December 2010, we performed in vivo SLNs mapping followed by ex vivo examination at 1, 10, and 48 hours. All blue nodes were separately included. In cases without LN metastases (pN0) five multilevel sections and immunohistochemical stain with cytokeratin 20 were performed in SLNs. Results: Two cases were excluded because they were in pT4 stage. In one case the diameter of lymph nodes was about 10 mm and we obtained a false negative result (negative SLNs with positivity in the non-SLNs). From the other 25 cases, 13 do not presented LN metastases or micrometastases, nine had metastases only in the SLNs and the other three in both SLNs and non-SLNs. Mean identified number of LNs was 15. The blue dye intensity increased after formalin fixation and some nodes with metastases were blue stained only after 10 hours. Conclusions: SLNs mapping is a simple and inexpensive technique, which can improve the management of CRC. All in vivo and ex vivo blue LNs should be considered SLNs. Ultrastaging of SLNs is an expensive method, with uncertain results. High diameter of LNs seems to be an exclusion criterion for SLNs mapping.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)593-598
Number of pages6
JournalRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
Volume52
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Colorectal Neoplasms
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Coloring Agents
Sentinel Lymph Node
Keratin-20
Neoplasm Micrometastasis
Formaldehyde

Keywords

  • Colorectal carcinoma
  • Lymph node metastases
  • Prognosis
  • Sentinel lymph node

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Embryology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Practical value of the complex analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinomas. / Gurzu, Simona; Jung, I.; Bara, T.; Bara, T.; Szentirmay, Z.; Azamfirei, L.; Tóth, Erika; Turcu, M.; Egyed-Zsigmond, Em.

In: Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie, Vol. 52, No. 2, 2011, p. 593-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gurzu, S, Jung, I, Bara, T, Bara, T, Szentirmay, Z, Azamfirei, L, Tóth, E, Turcu, M & Egyed-Zsigmond, E 2011, 'Practical value of the complex analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinomas', Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 593-598.
Gurzu, Simona ; Jung, I. ; Bara, T. ; Bara, T. ; Szentirmay, Z. ; Azamfirei, L. ; Tóth, Erika ; Turcu, M. ; Egyed-Zsigmond, Em. / Practical value of the complex analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinomas. In: Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. 2011 ; Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 593-598.
@article{58c5a1bc683049cebdc7820d201c6210,
title = "Practical value of the complex analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinomas",
abstract = "Background: Despite modern factors, which seem to predict outcome, lymph node (LN) status remain the main prognostic factor, which also shows the need for complex oncotherapy in colorectal carcinomas (CRC). Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) mapping is a very controversial method, which can increase the number of identified LN. Materials and Methods: In 28 patients who underwent surgical intervention between December 2009 and December 2010, we performed in vivo SLNs mapping followed by ex vivo examination at 1, 10, and 48 hours. All blue nodes were separately included. In cases without LN metastases (pN0) five multilevel sections and immunohistochemical stain with cytokeratin 20 were performed in SLNs. Results: Two cases were excluded because they were in pT4 stage. In one case the diameter of lymph nodes was about 10 mm and we obtained a false negative result (negative SLNs with positivity in the non-SLNs). From the other 25 cases, 13 do not presented LN metastases or micrometastases, nine had metastases only in the SLNs and the other three in both SLNs and non-SLNs. Mean identified number of LNs was 15. The blue dye intensity increased after formalin fixation and some nodes with metastases were blue stained only after 10 hours. Conclusions: SLNs mapping is a simple and inexpensive technique, which can improve the management of CRC. All in vivo and ex vivo blue LNs should be considered SLNs. Ultrastaging of SLNs is an expensive method, with uncertain results. High diameter of LNs seems to be an exclusion criterion for SLNs mapping.",
keywords = "Colorectal carcinoma, Lymph node metastases, Prognosis, Sentinel lymph node",
author = "Simona Gurzu and I. Jung and T. Bara and T. Bara and Z. Szentirmay and L. Azamfirei and Erika T{\'o}th and M. Turcu and Em Egyed-Zsigmond",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "593--598",
journal = "Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology",
issn = "1220-0522",
publisher = "Editura Academiei Romane",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical value of the complex analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinomas

AU - Gurzu, Simona

AU - Jung, I.

AU - Bara, T.

AU - Bara, T.

AU - Szentirmay, Z.

AU - Azamfirei, L.

AU - Tóth, Erika

AU - Turcu, M.

AU - Egyed-Zsigmond, Em

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: Despite modern factors, which seem to predict outcome, lymph node (LN) status remain the main prognostic factor, which also shows the need for complex oncotherapy in colorectal carcinomas (CRC). Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) mapping is a very controversial method, which can increase the number of identified LN. Materials and Methods: In 28 patients who underwent surgical intervention between December 2009 and December 2010, we performed in vivo SLNs mapping followed by ex vivo examination at 1, 10, and 48 hours. All blue nodes were separately included. In cases without LN metastases (pN0) five multilevel sections and immunohistochemical stain with cytokeratin 20 were performed in SLNs. Results: Two cases were excluded because they were in pT4 stage. In one case the diameter of lymph nodes was about 10 mm and we obtained a false negative result (negative SLNs with positivity in the non-SLNs). From the other 25 cases, 13 do not presented LN metastases or micrometastases, nine had metastases only in the SLNs and the other three in both SLNs and non-SLNs. Mean identified number of LNs was 15. The blue dye intensity increased after formalin fixation and some nodes with metastases were blue stained only after 10 hours. Conclusions: SLNs mapping is a simple and inexpensive technique, which can improve the management of CRC. All in vivo and ex vivo blue LNs should be considered SLNs. Ultrastaging of SLNs is an expensive method, with uncertain results. High diameter of LNs seems to be an exclusion criterion for SLNs mapping.

AB - Background: Despite modern factors, which seem to predict outcome, lymph node (LN) status remain the main prognostic factor, which also shows the need for complex oncotherapy in colorectal carcinomas (CRC). Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) mapping is a very controversial method, which can increase the number of identified LN. Materials and Methods: In 28 patients who underwent surgical intervention between December 2009 and December 2010, we performed in vivo SLNs mapping followed by ex vivo examination at 1, 10, and 48 hours. All blue nodes were separately included. In cases without LN metastases (pN0) five multilevel sections and immunohistochemical stain with cytokeratin 20 were performed in SLNs. Results: Two cases were excluded because they were in pT4 stage. In one case the diameter of lymph nodes was about 10 mm and we obtained a false negative result (negative SLNs with positivity in the non-SLNs). From the other 25 cases, 13 do not presented LN metastases or micrometastases, nine had metastases only in the SLNs and the other three in both SLNs and non-SLNs. Mean identified number of LNs was 15. The blue dye intensity increased after formalin fixation and some nodes with metastases were blue stained only after 10 hours. Conclusions: SLNs mapping is a simple and inexpensive technique, which can improve the management of CRC. All in vivo and ex vivo blue LNs should be considered SLNs. Ultrastaging of SLNs is an expensive method, with uncertain results. High diameter of LNs seems to be an exclusion criterion for SLNs mapping.

KW - Colorectal carcinoma

KW - Lymph node metastases

KW - Prognosis

KW - Sentinel lymph node

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959362854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959362854&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21655648

AN - SCOPUS:79959362854

VL - 52

SP - 593

EP - 598

JO - Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology

JF - Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology

SN - 1220-0522

IS - 2

ER -