Postcraniotomy headache

Levente Molnár, Éva Simon, Réka Nemes, B. Fülesdi, Csilla Molnár

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although pain after craniotomy is a clinically significant problem that has a continuously expanding literature, it is still a source of concern and controversy. Postcraniotomy headache (PCH) has been neglected for years. It is assessed regularly by only a few neurosurgical centers, and its frequency and severity tend to be underestimated by medical staff; hence, PCH is often undertreated and poorly managed. Various patient and surgical factors have an impact on the severity and incidence of PCH; thus, effective analgesic protocols are hard to define, which could explain the absence of available therapeutic guidelines. According to recent studies, certain surgical measures and the use of local anesthetics are promising in the prevention of PCH. NSAIDs seem to have inadequate analgesic effects, whereas opioids have a wide range of drawbacks; nevertheless, both types of medicaments are regarded as cornerstones of a balanced and adequate multimodal therapy. The purpose of this review is to collect the currently available knowledge about the incidence, assessment, pathophysiological mechanism, and predictors of acute and chronic PCH. Therefore, a broad search of the literature has been carried out to collect evidence of potential prevention and treatment strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-111
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Anesthesia
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Headache
Analgesics
Headache Disorders
Craniotomy
Medical Staff
Incidence
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Local Anesthetics
Opioid Analgesics
Therapeutics
Guidelines
Pain

Keywords

  • Analgesia
  • Craniotomy
  • Opioids
  • Postoperative headache

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Molnár, L., Simon, É., Nemes, R., Fülesdi, B., & Molnár, C. (2014). Postcraniotomy headache. Journal of Anesthesia, 28(1), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1671-z

Postcraniotomy headache. / Molnár, Levente; Simon, Éva; Nemes, Réka; Fülesdi, B.; Molnár, Csilla.

In: Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 28, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 102-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Molnár, L, Simon, É, Nemes, R, Fülesdi, B & Molnár, C 2014, 'Postcraniotomy headache', Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1671-z
Molnár L, Simon É, Nemes R, Fülesdi B, Molnár C. Postcraniotomy headache. Journal of Anesthesia. 2014 Feb;28(1):102-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1671-z
Molnár, Levente ; Simon, Éva ; Nemes, Réka ; Fülesdi, B. ; Molnár, Csilla. / Postcraniotomy headache. In: Journal of Anesthesia. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 102-111.
@article{789e0f3b8c614f96819160a38d95a3d3,
title = "Postcraniotomy headache",
abstract = "Although pain after craniotomy is a clinically significant problem that has a continuously expanding literature, it is still a source of concern and controversy. Postcraniotomy headache (PCH) has been neglected for years. It is assessed regularly by only a few neurosurgical centers, and its frequency and severity tend to be underestimated by medical staff; hence, PCH is often undertreated and poorly managed. Various patient and surgical factors have an impact on the severity and incidence of PCH; thus, effective analgesic protocols are hard to define, which could explain the absence of available therapeutic guidelines. According to recent studies, certain surgical measures and the use of local anesthetics are promising in the prevention of PCH. NSAIDs seem to have inadequate analgesic effects, whereas opioids have a wide range of drawbacks; nevertheless, both types of medicaments are regarded as cornerstones of a balanced and adequate multimodal therapy. The purpose of this review is to collect the currently available knowledge about the incidence, assessment, pathophysiological mechanism, and predictors of acute and chronic PCH. Therefore, a broad search of the literature has been carried out to collect evidence of potential prevention and treatment strategies.",
keywords = "Analgesia, Craniotomy, Opioids, Postoperative headache",
author = "Levente Moln{\'a}r and {\'E}va Simon and R{\'e}ka Nemes and B. F{\"u}lesdi and Csilla Moln{\'a}r",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00540-013-1671-z",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "102--111",
journal = "Journal of Anesthesia",
issn = "0913-8668",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postcraniotomy headache

AU - Molnár, Levente

AU - Simon, Éva

AU - Nemes, Réka

AU - Fülesdi, B.

AU - Molnár, Csilla

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Although pain after craniotomy is a clinically significant problem that has a continuously expanding literature, it is still a source of concern and controversy. Postcraniotomy headache (PCH) has been neglected for years. It is assessed regularly by only a few neurosurgical centers, and its frequency and severity tend to be underestimated by medical staff; hence, PCH is often undertreated and poorly managed. Various patient and surgical factors have an impact on the severity and incidence of PCH; thus, effective analgesic protocols are hard to define, which could explain the absence of available therapeutic guidelines. According to recent studies, certain surgical measures and the use of local anesthetics are promising in the prevention of PCH. NSAIDs seem to have inadequate analgesic effects, whereas opioids have a wide range of drawbacks; nevertheless, both types of medicaments are regarded as cornerstones of a balanced and adequate multimodal therapy. The purpose of this review is to collect the currently available knowledge about the incidence, assessment, pathophysiological mechanism, and predictors of acute and chronic PCH. Therefore, a broad search of the literature has been carried out to collect evidence of potential prevention and treatment strategies.

AB - Although pain after craniotomy is a clinically significant problem that has a continuously expanding literature, it is still a source of concern and controversy. Postcraniotomy headache (PCH) has been neglected for years. It is assessed regularly by only a few neurosurgical centers, and its frequency and severity tend to be underestimated by medical staff; hence, PCH is often undertreated and poorly managed. Various patient and surgical factors have an impact on the severity and incidence of PCH; thus, effective analgesic protocols are hard to define, which could explain the absence of available therapeutic guidelines. According to recent studies, certain surgical measures and the use of local anesthetics are promising in the prevention of PCH. NSAIDs seem to have inadequate analgesic effects, whereas opioids have a wide range of drawbacks; nevertheless, both types of medicaments are regarded as cornerstones of a balanced and adequate multimodal therapy. The purpose of this review is to collect the currently available knowledge about the incidence, assessment, pathophysiological mechanism, and predictors of acute and chronic PCH. Therefore, a broad search of the literature has been carried out to collect evidence of potential prevention and treatment strategies.

KW - Analgesia

KW - Craniotomy

KW - Opioids

KW - Postoperative headache

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894486826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894486826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00540-013-1671-z

DO - 10.1007/s00540-013-1671-z

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 102

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Anesthesia

SN - 0913-8668

IS - 1

ER -