Policy responses to problematic video game use: A systematic review of current measures and future possibilities

Orsolya Király, Mark D. Griffiths, Daniel L. King, Hae Kook Lee, Seung Yup Lee, Fanni Bányai, Ágnes Zsila, Zsofia K. Takacs, Z. Demetrovics

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aims: Empirical research into problematic video game playing suggests that overuse might cause functional and psychological impairments for a minority of gamers. Therefore, the need for regulation in the case of video games (whether governmental or self-imposed) has arisen but has only been implemented in a few countries around the world, and predominantly in Asia. This paper provides a systematic review of current and potential policies addressing problematic gaming. Methods: After conducting a systematic search in the areas of prevention, treatment, and policy measures relating to problematic Internet and video game use, papers were selected that targeted problematic gaming policies (N = 12; six in English and six in Korean). These papers served as the basis of this review. Results: Policies were classified into three major groups: (i) policy measures limiting availability of video games (e.g., shutdown policy, fatigue system, and parental controls), (ii) measures aiming to reduce risk and harm (e.g., warning messages), and (iii) measures taken to provide help services for gamers. Beyond the attempt to classify the current and potential policy measures, the authors also tried to evaluate their efficiency theoretically and (if data were available) empirically. Discussion and conclusions: Overall, it appears that although several steps have been taken to address problematic video game playing, most of these steps were not as effective as expected, or had not been evaluated empirically for efficacy. The reason for this may lie in the fact that the policies outlined only addressed or influenced specific aspects of the problem instead of using a more integrative approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-517
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Behavioral Addictions
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Video Games
Empirical Research
Internet
Fatigue
Psychology

Keywords

  • Gaming addiction regulation
  • Gaming policy
  • Internet Gaming Disorder
  • Problematic video game playing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Policy responses to problematic video game use : A systematic review of current measures and future possibilities. / Király, Orsolya; Griffiths, Mark D.; King, Daniel L.; Lee, Hae Kook; Lee, Seung Yup; Bányai, Fanni; Zsila, Ágnes; Takacs, Zsofia K.; Demetrovics, Z.

In: Journal of Behavioral Addictions, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 503-517.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Király, Orsolya ; Griffiths, Mark D. ; King, Daniel L. ; Lee, Hae Kook ; Lee, Seung Yup ; Bányai, Fanni ; Zsila, Ágnes ; Takacs, Zsofia K. ; Demetrovics, Z. / Policy responses to problematic video game use : A systematic review of current measures and future possibilities. In: Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2018 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 503-517.
@article{8ec7f3fae7da46969071ad9ea097f5c1,
title = "Policy responses to problematic video game use: A systematic review of current measures and future possibilities",
abstract = "Background and aims: Empirical research into problematic video game playing suggests that overuse might cause functional and psychological impairments for a minority of gamers. Therefore, the need for regulation in the case of video games (whether governmental or self-imposed) has arisen but has only been implemented in a few countries around the world, and predominantly in Asia. This paper provides a systematic review of current and potential policies addressing problematic gaming. Methods: After conducting a systematic search in the areas of prevention, treatment, and policy measures relating to problematic Internet and video game use, papers were selected that targeted problematic gaming policies (N = 12; six in English and six in Korean). These papers served as the basis of this review. Results: Policies were classified into three major groups: (i) policy measures limiting availability of video games (e.g., shutdown policy, fatigue system, and parental controls), (ii) measures aiming to reduce risk and harm (e.g., warning messages), and (iii) measures taken to provide help services for gamers. Beyond the attempt to classify the current and potential policy measures, the authors also tried to evaluate their efficiency theoretically and (if data were available) empirically. Discussion and conclusions: Overall, it appears that although several steps have been taken to address problematic video game playing, most of these steps were not as effective as expected, or had not been evaluated empirically for efficacy. The reason for this may lie in the fact that the policies outlined only addressed or influenced specific aspects of the problem instead of using a more integrative approach.",
keywords = "Gaming addiction regulation, Gaming policy, Internet Gaming Disorder, Problematic video game playing",
author = "Orsolya Kir{\'a}ly and Griffiths, {Mark D.} and King, {Daniel L.} and Lee, {Hae Kook} and Lee, {Seung Yup} and Fanni B{\'a}nyai and {\'A}gnes Zsila and Takacs, {Zsofia K.} and Z. Demetrovics",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1556/2006.6.2017.050",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "503--517",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Addictions",
issn = "2062-5871",
publisher = "Akademiai Kiado",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy responses to problematic video game use

T2 - A systematic review of current measures and future possibilities

AU - Király, Orsolya

AU - Griffiths, Mark D.

AU - King, Daniel L.

AU - Lee, Hae Kook

AU - Lee, Seung Yup

AU - Bányai, Fanni

AU - Zsila, Ágnes

AU - Takacs, Zsofia K.

AU - Demetrovics, Z.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background and aims: Empirical research into problematic video game playing suggests that overuse might cause functional and psychological impairments for a minority of gamers. Therefore, the need for regulation in the case of video games (whether governmental or self-imposed) has arisen but has only been implemented in a few countries around the world, and predominantly in Asia. This paper provides a systematic review of current and potential policies addressing problematic gaming. Methods: After conducting a systematic search in the areas of prevention, treatment, and policy measures relating to problematic Internet and video game use, papers were selected that targeted problematic gaming policies (N = 12; six in English and six in Korean). These papers served as the basis of this review. Results: Policies were classified into three major groups: (i) policy measures limiting availability of video games (e.g., shutdown policy, fatigue system, and parental controls), (ii) measures aiming to reduce risk and harm (e.g., warning messages), and (iii) measures taken to provide help services for gamers. Beyond the attempt to classify the current and potential policy measures, the authors also tried to evaluate their efficiency theoretically and (if data were available) empirically. Discussion and conclusions: Overall, it appears that although several steps have been taken to address problematic video game playing, most of these steps were not as effective as expected, or had not been evaluated empirically for efficacy. The reason for this may lie in the fact that the policies outlined only addressed or influenced specific aspects of the problem instead of using a more integrative approach.

AB - Background and aims: Empirical research into problematic video game playing suggests that overuse might cause functional and psychological impairments for a minority of gamers. Therefore, the need for regulation in the case of video games (whether governmental or self-imposed) has arisen but has only been implemented in a few countries around the world, and predominantly in Asia. This paper provides a systematic review of current and potential policies addressing problematic gaming. Methods: After conducting a systematic search in the areas of prevention, treatment, and policy measures relating to problematic Internet and video game use, papers were selected that targeted problematic gaming policies (N = 12; six in English and six in Korean). These papers served as the basis of this review. Results: Policies were classified into three major groups: (i) policy measures limiting availability of video games (e.g., shutdown policy, fatigue system, and parental controls), (ii) measures aiming to reduce risk and harm (e.g., warning messages), and (iii) measures taken to provide help services for gamers. Beyond the attempt to classify the current and potential policy measures, the authors also tried to evaluate their efficiency theoretically and (if data were available) empirically. Discussion and conclusions: Overall, it appears that although several steps have been taken to address problematic video game playing, most of these steps were not as effective as expected, or had not been evaluated empirically for efficacy. The reason for this may lie in the fact that the policies outlined only addressed or influenced specific aspects of the problem instead of using a more integrative approach.

KW - Gaming addiction regulation

KW - Gaming policy

KW - Internet Gaming Disorder

KW - Problematic video game playing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049414224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049414224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1556/2006.6.2017.050

DO - 10.1556/2006.6.2017.050

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28859487

AN - SCOPUS:85049414224

VL - 7

SP - 503

EP - 517

JO - Journal of Behavioral Addictions

JF - Journal of Behavioral Addictions

SN - 2062-5871

IS - 3

ER -