Pleasure in decision-making situations

Michel Cabanac, Jacqueline Guillaume, M. Balaskó, Adriana Fleury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study explores the role of pleasure in decision making. Results: In Experiment 1, 12 subjects were presented with a questionnaire containing 46 items taken from the literature. Twenty-three items described a situation where a decision should be made and ended with a suggested solution. The other items served as filler items. The subjects were requested not to make a decision but to rate the pleasure or displeasure they experienced when reading the situation described in the item. The subjects' ratings were then compared to the decisions on the same situations made by the other subjects of the studies published by other workers. The ratings of pleasure/displeasure given by our subjects correlated significantly with the choices published by other authors. This result satisfies a necessary condition for pleasure to be the key of the decision making process in theoretical situations. In Experiment 2, a new group of 12 subjects rated their experience of pleasure/displeasure when reading various versions of 50 situations taken from daily life where an ethical decision had to be made (Questionnaire I) including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice test with the 50 situations (Questionnaire II) using the same 200 items and offering the various behaviors. Subjects tended to choose ethical and unethical responses corresponding to their highest pleasure rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. In Experiment 3, 12 subjects reading 50 mathematical short problems followed by correct and incorrect versions of the answer to the problem (Questionnaire III), including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice mathematical test with the 50 problems (Questionnaire IV) using the same 200 items and offering the correct and incorrect answers. In questionnaire IV, subjects tended to choose correct as well as incorrect responses corresponding to their highest hedonic rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. Conclusions: The results of the three experiments support the hypothesis according to which decisions are made in the hedonic dimension of conscious experience.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 29 2002

Fingerprint

Pleasure
Decision Making
Reading
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Pleasure in decision-making situations. / Cabanac, Michel; Guillaume, Jacqueline; Balaskó, M.; Fleury, Adriana.

In: BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 2, 7, 29.05.2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cabanac, Michel ; Guillaume, Jacqueline ; Balaskó, M. ; Fleury, Adriana. / Pleasure in decision-making situations. In: BMC Psychiatry. 2002 ; Vol. 2.
@article{6903f5fe9ad7450894658fe61ea243b3,
title = "Pleasure in decision-making situations",
abstract = "Background: This study explores the role of pleasure in decision making. Results: In Experiment 1, 12 subjects were presented with a questionnaire containing 46 items taken from the literature. Twenty-three items described a situation where a decision should be made and ended with a suggested solution. The other items served as filler items. The subjects were requested not to make a decision but to rate the pleasure or displeasure they experienced when reading the situation described in the item. The subjects' ratings were then compared to the decisions on the same situations made by the other subjects of the studies published by other workers. The ratings of pleasure/displeasure given by our subjects correlated significantly with the choices published by other authors. This result satisfies a necessary condition for pleasure to be the key of the decision making process in theoretical situations. In Experiment 2, a new group of 12 subjects rated their experience of pleasure/displeasure when reading various versions of 50 situations taken from daily life where an ethical decision had to be made (Questionnaire I) including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice test with the 50 situations (Questionnaire II) using the same 200 items and offering the various behaviors. Subjects tended to choose ethical and unethical responses corresponding to their highest pleasure rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. In Experiment 3, 12 subjects reading 50 mathematical short problems followed by correct and incorrect versions of the answer to the problem (Questionnaire III), including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice mathematical test with the 50 problems (Questionnaire IV) using the same 200 items and offering the correct and incorrect answers. In questionnaire IV, subjects tended to choose correct as well as incorrect responses corresponding to their highest hedonic rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. Conclusions: The results of the three experiments support the hypothesis according to which decisions are made in the hedonic dimension of conscious experience.",
author = "Michel Cabanac and Jacqueline Guillaume and M. Balask{\'o} and Adriana Fleury",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/1471-244X-2-7",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "BMC Psychiatry",
issn = "1471-244X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pleasure in decision-making situations

AU - Cabanac, Michel

AU - Guillaume, Jacqueline

AU - Balaskó, M.

AU - Fleury, Adriana

PY - 2002/5/29

Y1 - 2002/5/29

N2 - Background: This study explores the role of pleasure in decision making. Results: In Experiment 1, 12 subjects were presented with a questionnaire containing 46 items taken from the literature. Twenty-three items described a situation where a decision should be made and ended with a suggested solution. The other items served as filler items. The subjects were requested not to make a decision but to rate the pleasure or displeasure they experienced when reading the situation described in the item. The subjects' ratings were then compared to the decisions on the same situations made by the other subjects of the studies published by other workers. The ratings of pleasure/displeasure given by our subjects correlated significantly with the choices published by other authors. This result satisfies a necessary condition for pleasure to be the key of the decision making process in theoretical situations. In Experiment 2, a new group of 12 subjects rated their experience of pleasure/displeasure when reading various versions of 50 situations taken from daily life where an ethical decision had to be made (Questionnaire I) including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice test with the 50 situations (Questionnaire II) using the same 200 items and offering the various behaviors. Subjects tended to choose ethical and unethical responses corresponding to their highest pleasure rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. In Experiment 3, 12 subjects reading 50 mathematical short problems followed by correct and incorrect versions of the answer to the problem (Questionnaire III), including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice mathematical test with the 50 problems (Questionnaire IV) using the same 200 items and offering the correct and incorrect answers. In questionnaire IV, subjects tended to choose correct as well as incorrect responses corresponding to their highest hedonic rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. Conclusions: The results of the three experiments support the hypothesis according to which decisions are made in the hedonic dimension of conscious experience.

AB - Background: This study explores the role of pleasure in decision making. Results: In Experiment 1, 12 subjects were presented with a questionnaire containing 46 items taken from the literature. Twenty-three items described a situation where a decision should be made and ended with a suggested solution. The other items served as filler items. The subjects were requested not to make a decision but to rate the pleasure or displeasure they experienced when reading the situation described in the item. The subjects' ratings were then compared to the decisions on the same situations made by the other subjects of the studies published by other workers. The ratings of pleasure/displeasure given by our subjects correlated significantly with the choices published by other authors. This result satisfies a necessary condition for pleasure to be the key of the decision making process in theoretical situations. In Experiment 2, a new group of 12 subjects rated their experience of pleasure/displeasure when reading various versions of 50 situations taken from daily life where an ethical decision had to be made (Questionnaire I) including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice test with the 50 situations (Questionnaire II) using the same 200 items and offering the various behaviors. Subjects tended to choose ethical and unethical responses corresponding to their highest pleasure rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. In Experiment 3, 12 subjects reading 50 mathematical short problems followed by correct and incorrect versions of the answer to the problem (Questionnaire III), including 200 items. This was followed by a multiple-choice mathematical test with the 50 problems (Questionnaire IV) using the same 200 items and offering the correct and incorrect answers. In questionnaire IV, subjects tended to choose correct as well as incorrect responses corresponding to their highest hedonic rating within each problem. In all cases the subjects' behavior was higher than chance level, and thus, followed the trend to maximize pleasure. Conclusions: The results of the three experiments support the hypothesis according to which decisions are made in the hedonic dimension of conscious experience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2642556364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2642556364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-244X-2-7

DO - 10.1186/1471-244X-2-7

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - BMC Psychiatry

JF - BMC Psychiatry

SN - 1471-244X

M1 - 7

ER -