Para-split laminotomy

A rescue technique for split laminotomy approach in exploring intramedullary midline located pathologies

Csaba Padanyi, Janos Vajda, Peter Banczerowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Conventional posterior approaches, which may involve multilevel laminectomies and facetectomies, may lead to spinal deformities, instability, and subluxation. We developed the multilevel spinous process splitting and distraction laminotomy technique, which is an option for approaching midline intramedullary spinal pathologies with preservation of mechanically relevant bone and muscle structures. In some cases, midline splitting is not feasible or convenient because of anatomical differences of spinous processes and laminas. Our objective was to develop a minimally invasive rescue approach technique that makes it possible to remove intramedullary lesions but does not increase the risk of damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine. Methods We used the para-split laminotomy technique for opening the spinal canal not in the midline but rather in the parasagittal plane. The technique can be combined with the basic split laminotomy technique. This novel technique was used in five adult patients with midline intramedullary pathologies of the cervical and cervicothoracic spine. Results The operating field under the microscope was sufficient for tumor removal according to the keyhole concept. The approach used did not affect the extent of resection or neurologic outcome. The average number of split laminae was 6 (range: 3-10). Average follow-up was 18 months (range: 13-36 months). Histologic results were as follows: two ependymomas, two astrocytomas, and one primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET). To confirm the extension of resection, all patients underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluations. The resections were complete in the cases of two ependymomas, subtotal in one astrocytoma, and partial in the other astrocytoma case and the PNET case. Computed tomography scans showed the extension of para-split approaches and the moderately disturbed bony structures. Instability was detected in none of the patients on the flexion-extension lateral radiographs during the follow-up period. Conclusion The minimally invasive multilevel para-split laminotomy approach as a rescue technique for split laminotomy is a safe and effective surgical procedure, suitable for exploring different intramedullary pathologies located in the midline of the spinal canal. This modified surgical approach fulfills the requirements of other minimally invasive techniques and lowers the risk of damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine; furthermore, disintegration of the vertebral arches and facet joints is reduced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-316
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurological Surgery, Part A: Central European Neurosurgery
Volume75
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Laminectomy
Pathology
Astrocytoma
Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors
Ependymoma
Spinal Canal
Spine
Zygapophyseal Joint
Nervous System
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Bone and Bones
Muscles
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • intramedullary tumor
  • keyhole
  • split laminotomy
  • surgical technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{f20111945b5d41b49c8ddf9fdea8b474,
title = "Para-split laminotomy: A rescue technique for split laminotomy approach in exploring intramedullary midline located pathologies",
abstract = "Objective Conventional posterior approaches, which may involve multilevel laminectomies and facetectomies, may lead to spinal deformities, instability, and subluxation. We developed the multilevel spinous process splitting and distraction laminotomy technique, which is an option for approaching midline intramedullary spinal pathologies with preservation of mechanically relevant bone and muscle structures. In some cases, midline splitting is not feasible or convenient because of anatomical differences of spinous processes and laminas. Our objective was to develop a minimally invasive rescue approach technique that makes it possible to remove intramedullary lesions but does not increase the risk of damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine. Methods We used the para-split laminotomy technique for opening the spinal canal not in the midline but rather in the parasagittal plane. The technique can be combined with the basic split laminotomy technique. This novel technique was used in five adult patients with midline intramedullary pathologies of the cervical and cervicothoracic spine. Results The operating field under the microscope was sufficient for tumor removal according to the keyhole concept. The approach used did not affect the extent of resection or neurologic outcome. The average number of split laminae was 6 (range: 3-10). Average follow-up was 18 months (range: 13-36 months). Histologic results were as follows: two ependymomas, two astrocytomas, and one primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET). To confirm the extension of resection, all patients underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluations. The resections were complete in the cases of two ependymomas, subtotal in one astrocytoma, and partial in the other astrocytoma case and the PNET case. Computed tomography scans showed the extension of para-split approaches and the moderately disturbed bony structures. Instability was detected in none of the patients on the flexion-extension lateral radiographs during the follow-up period. Conclusion The minimally invasive multilevel para-split laminotomy approach as a rescue technique for split laminotomy is a safe and effective surgical procedure, suitable for exploring different intramedullary pathologies located in the midline of the spinal canal. This modified surgical approach fulfills the requirements of other minimally invasive techniques and lowers the risk of damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine; furthermore, disintegration of the vertebral arches and facet joints is reduced.",
keywords = "intramedullary tumor, keyhole, split laminotomy, surgical technique",
author = "Csaba Padanyi and Janos Vajda and Peter Banczerowski",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1055/s-0033-1356487",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "310--316",
journal = "Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part A: Central European Neurosurgery",
issn = "2193-6315",
publisher = "Thieme",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Para-split laminotomy

T2 - A rescue technique for split laminotomy approach in exploring intramedullary midline located pathologies

AU - Padanyi, Csaba

AU - Vajda, Janos

AU - Banczerowski, Peter

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective Conventional posterior approaches, which may involve multilevel laminectomies and facetectomies, may lead to spinal deformities, instability, and subluxation. We developed the multilevel spinous process splitting and distraction laminotomy technique, which is an option for approaching midline intramedullary spinal pathologies with preservation of mechanically relevant bone and muscle structures. In some cases, midline splitting is not feasible or convenient because of anatomical differences of spinous processes and laminas. Our objective was to develop a minimally invasive rescue approach technique that makes it possible to remove intramedullary lesions but does not increase the risk of damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine. Methods We used the para-split laminotomy technique for opening the spinal canal not in the midline but rather in the parasagittal plane. The technique can be combined with the basic split laminotomy technique. This novel technique was used in five adult patients with midline intramedullary pathologies of the cervical and cervicothoracic spine. Results The operating field under the microscope was sufficient for tumor removal according to the keyhole concept. The approach used did not affect the extent of resection or neurologic outcome. The average number of split laminae was 6 (range: 3-10). Average follow-up was 18 months (range: 13-36 months). Histologic results were as follows: two ependymomas, two astrocytomas, and one primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET). To confirm the extension of resection, all patients underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluations. The resections were complete in the cases of two ependymomas, subtotal in one astrocytoma, and partial in the other astrocytoma case and the PNET case. Computed tomography scans showed the extension of para-split approaches and the moderately disturbed bony structures. Instability was detected in none of the patients on the flexion-extension lateral radiographs during the follow-up period. Conclusion The minimally invasive multilevel para-split laminotomy approach as a rescue technique for split laminotomy is a safe and effective surgical procedure, suitable for exploring different intramedullary pathologies located in the midline of the spinal canal. This modified surgical approach fulfills the requirements of other minimally invasive techniques and lowers the risk of damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine; furthermore, disintegration of the vertebral arches and facet joints is reduced.

AB - Objective Conventional posterior approaches, which may involve multilevel laminectomies and facetectomies, may lead to spinal deformities, instability, and subluxation. We developed the multilevel spinous process splitting and distraction laminotomy technique, which is an option for approaching midline intramedullary spinal pathologies with preservation of mechanically relevant bone and muscle structures. In some cases, midline splitting is not feasible or convenient because of anatomical differences of spinous processes and laminas. Our objective was to develop a minimally invasive rescue approach technique that makes it possible to remove intramedullary lesions but does not increase the risk of damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine. Methods We used the para-split laminotomy technique for opening the spinal canal not in the midline but rather in the parasagittal plane. The technique can be combined with the basic split laminotomy technique. This novel technique was used in five adult patients with midline intramedullary pathologies of the cervical and cervicothoracic spine. Results The operating field under the microscope was sufficient for tumor removal according to the keyhole concept. The approach used did not affect the extent of resection or neurologic outcome. The average number of split laminae was 6 (range: 3-10). Average follow-up was 18 months (range: 13-36 months). Histologic results were as follows: two ependymomas, two astrocytomas, and one primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET). To confirm the extension of resection, all patients underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluations. The resections were complete in the cases of two ependymomas, subtotal in one astrocytoma, and partial in the other astrocytoma case and the PNET case. Computed tomography scans showed the extension of para-split approaches and the moderately disturbed bony structures. Instability was detected in none of the patients on the flexion-extension lateral radiographs during the follow-up period. Conclusion The minimally invasive multilevel para-split laminotomy approach as a rescue technique for split laminotomy is a safe and effective surgical procedure, suitable for exploring different intramedullary pathologies located in the midline of the spinal canal. This modified surgical approach fulfills the requirements of other minimally invasive techniques and lowers the risk of damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine; furthermore, disintegration of the vertebral arches and facet joints is reduced.

KW - intramedullary tumor

KW - keyhole

KW - split laminotomy

KW - surgical technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903376105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903376105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0033-1356487

DO - 10.1055/s-0033-1356487

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 310

EP - 316

JO - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part A: Central European Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part A: Central European Neurosurgery

SN - 2193-6315

IS - 4

ER -