A pancreas sebészete

Translated title of the contribution: Pancreatic surgery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently, surgery has become less important in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. It is evident, that only proved infected necrosis means indication of surgical intervention. Operation should be delayed as far as possible, at least three or four weeks after the onset of symptoms. Minimally invasive methods such as CT- or US-guided percutaneous drainage have gained ground recently. Fine-needle biopsy is an absolute neccessary part of the treatment and it provides targeted antibiotic therapy. In the surgery of chronic pancreatitis, duodenum-preserving head resections have gained ground and they have become the gold standard of surgical treatment of this disease. In pancreatic carcinoma it has become unequivocal that increased surgical radicality do not improve survival. Progression has been made in the field of security of surgical interventions, for example the Whipple-operation can be performed with a mortality rate of 5% in special centers. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy has not been proved yet.

Original languageHungarian
Pages (from-to)243-248
Number of pages6
JournalOrvoskepzes
Volume83
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Neoadjuvant Therapy
Chronic Pancreatitis
Therapeutics
Fine Needle Biopsy
Duodenum
Pancreatitis
Drainage
Necrosis
Head
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Mortality
Pancreatic Carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Oláh, A. (2008). A pancreas sebészete. Orvoskepzes, 83(3), 243-248.

A pancreas sebészete. / Oláh, A.

In: Orvoskepzes, Vol. 83, No. 3, 2008, p. 243-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oláh, A 2008, 'A pancreas sebészete', Orvoskepzes, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 243-248.
Oláh, A. / A pancreas sebészete. In: Orvoskepzes. 2008 ; Vol. 83, No. 3. pp. 243-248.
@article{a0ee3cbaf3d148c6b174d2647acb2afa,
title = "A pancreas seb{\'e}szete",
abstract = "Recently, surgery has become less important in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. It is evident, that only proved infected necrosis means indication of surgical intervention. Operation should be delayed as far as possible, at least three or four weeks after the onset of symptoms. Minimally invasive methods such as CT- or US-guided percutaneous drainage have gained ground recently. Fine-needle biopsy is an absolute neccessary part of the treatment and it provides targeted antibiotic therapy. In the surgery of chronic pancreatitis, duodenum-preserving head resections have gained ground and they have become the gold standard of surgical treatment of this disease. In pancreatic carcinoma it has become unequivocal that increased surgical radicality do not improve survival. Progression has been made in the field of security of surgical interventions, for example the Whipple-operation can be performed with a mortality rate of 5{\%} in special centers. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy has not been proved yet.",
keywords = "Acute necrotizing pancreatitis, Chronic pancreatitis, Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, Indication of surgical interventions, Neoadjuvant therapy, Pancreatic carcinoma, Surgical radicality",
author = "A. Ol{\'a}h",
year = "2008",
language = "Hungarian",
volume = "83",
pages = "243--248",
journal = "Orvoskepzes",
issn = "0030-6037",
publisher = "Semmelweis Kiado",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pancreas sebészete

AU - Oláh, A.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Recently, surgery has become less important in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. It is evident, that only proved infected necrosis means indication of surgical intervention. Operation should be delayed as far as possible, at least three or four weeks after the onset of symptoms. Minimally invasive methods such as CT- or US-guided percutaneous drainage have gained ground recently. Fine-needle biopsy is an absolute neccessary part of the treatment and it provides targeted antibiotic therapy. In the surgery of chronic pancreatitis, duodenum-preserving head resections have gained ground and they have become the gold standard of surgical treatment of this disease. In pancreatic carcinoma it has become unequivocal that increased surgical radicality do not improve survival. Progression has been made in the field of security of surgical interventions, for example the Whipple-operation can be performed with a mortality rate of 5% in special centers. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy has not been proved yet.

AB - Recently, surgery has become less important in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. It is evident, that only proved infected necrosis means indication of surgical intervention. Operation should be delayed as far as possible, at least three or four weeks after the onset of symptoms. Minimally invasive methods such as CT- or US-guided percutaneous drainage have gained ground recently. Fine-needle biopsy is an absolute neccessary part of the treatment and it provides targeted antibiotic therapy. In the surgery of chronic pancreatitis, duodenum-preserving head resections have gained ground and they have become the gold standard of surgical treatment of this disease. In pancreatic carcinoma it has become unequivocal that increased surgical radicality do not improve survival. Progression has been made in the field of security of surgical interventions, for example the Whipple-operation can be performed with a mortality rate of 5% in special centers. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy has not been proved yet.

KW - Acute necrotizing pancreatitis

KW - Chronic pancreatitis

KW - Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection

KW - Indication of surgical interventions

KW - Neoadjuvant therapy

KW - Pancreatic carcinoma

KW - Surgical radicality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57549111483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57549111483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 243

EP - 248

JO - Orvoskepzes

JF - Orvoskepzes

SN - 0030-6037

IS - 3

ER -