Node centrality indices in food webs

Rank orders versus distributions

Barbara Bauer, Ferenc Jordán, J. Podaní

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Network analysis examines the role of species in ecological communities. The most common approach involves measurement of centrality of species or other groups of individuals based on their topological positions in food webs, followed by establishing the rank order of importance of these groups. However, ranking may differ considerably with indices of centrality and therefore comparison of rank orders is essential to obtain more meaningful results on species performance. Since ranking ignores absolute differences between centrality values, species orders may neglect important structural information in food webs. Consequently, simultaneous examination of the distribution of index values is inevitable. Hierarchical clustering and consensus generation revealed that rank orders of centrality exhibit a similar pattern over six example food webs, while distributions differ not only with indices because their relationships are largely inconsistent with food webs as well. Therefore, optimal analysis of networks and the selection of keystone species in any ecological study should rely upon both of these procedures. Similar conclusions are drawn from the detailed evaluation of a sample food web from the Florida Bay.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-477
Number of pages7
JournalEcological Complexity
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

food webs
food web
ranking
keystone species
network analysis
distribution
index
sampling

Keywords

  • Clustering
  • Consensus dendrograms
  • Food web
  • Keystone species
  • Network centrality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecological Modelling

Cite this

Node centrality indices in food webs : Rank orders versus distributions. / Bauer, Barbara; Jordán, Ferenc; Podaní, J.

In: Ecological Complexity, Vol. 7, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 471-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bauer, Barbara ; Jordán, Ferenc ; Podaní, J. / Node centrality indices in food webs : Rank orders versus distributions. In: Ecological Complexity. 2010 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 471-477.
@article{5d1178acb2cb4e6ba2fb32cdc3124a3e,
title = "Node centrality indices in food webs: Rank orders versus distributions",
abstract = "Network analysis examines the role of species in ecological communities. The most common approach involves measurement of centrality of species or other groups of individuals based on their topological positions in food webs, followed by establishing the rank order of importance of these groups. However, ranking may differ considerably with indices of centrality and therefore comparison of rank orders is essential to obtain more meaningful results on species performance. Since ranking ignores absolute differences between centrality values, species orders may neglect important structural information in food webs. Consequently, simultaneous examination of the distribution of index values is inevitable. Hierarchical clustering and consensus generation revealed that rank orders of centrality exhibit a similar pattern over six example food webs, while distributions differ not only with indices because their relationships are largely inconsistent with food webs as well. Therefore, optimal analysis of networks and the selection of keystone species in any ecological study should rely upon both of these procedures. Similar conclusions are drawn from the detailed evaluation of a sample food web from the Florida Bay.",
keywords = "Clustering, Consensus dendrograms, Food web, Keystone species, Network centrality",
author = "Barbara Bauer and Ferenc Jord{\'a}n and J. Podan{\'i}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.006",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "471--477",
journal = "Ecological Complexity",
issn = "1476-945X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Node centrality indices in food webs

T2 - Rank orders versus distributions

AU - Bauer, Barbara

AU - Jordán, Ferenc

AU - Podaní, J.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Network analysis examines the role of species in ecological communities. The most common approach involves measurement of centrality of species or other groups of individuals based on their topological positions in food webs, followed by establishing the rank order of importance of these groups. However, ranking may differ considerably with indices of centrality and therefore comparison of rank orders is essential to obtain more meaningful results on species performance. Since ranking ignores absolute differences between centrality values, species orders may neglect important structural information in food webs. Consequently, simultaneous examination of the distribution of index values is inevitable. Hierarchical clustering and consensus generation revealed that rank orders of centrality exhibit a similar pattern over six example food webs, while distributions differ not only with indices because their relationships are largely inconsistent with food webs as well. Therefore, optimal analysis of networks and the selection of keystone species in any ecological study should rely upon both of these procedures. Similar conclusions are drawn from the detailed evaluation of a sample food web from the Florida Bay.

AB - Network analysis examines the role of species in ecological communities. The most common approach involves measurement of centrality of species or other groups of individuals based on their topological positions in food webs, followed by establishing the rank order of importance of these groups. However, ranking may differ considerably with indices of centrality and therefore comparison of rank orders is essential to obtain more meaningful results on species performance. Since ranking ignores absolute differences between centrality values, species orders may neglect important structural information in food webs. Consequently, simultaneous examination of the distribution of index values is inevitable. Hierarchical clustering and consensus generation revealed that rank orders of centrality exhibit a similar pattern over six example food webs, while distributions differ not only with indices because their relationships are largely inconsistent with food webs as well. Therefore, optimal analysis of networks and the selection of keystone species in any ecological study should rely upon both of these procedures. Similar conclusions are drawn from the detailed evaluation of a sample food web from the Florida Bay.

KW - Clustering

KW - Consensus dendrograms

KW - Food web

KW - Keystone species

KW - Network centrality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049465387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049465387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.006

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 471

EP - 477

JO - Ecological Complexity

JF - Ecological Complexity

SN - 1476-945X

IS - 4

ER -