Natural or pathologic? Discrepancies in the study of behavioral and cognitive signs in aging family dogs

Dóra Szabó, Nancy R. Gee, A. Miklósi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent decades, typical and pathologic behavioral and mental aging in family dogs has received increased attention. This article reviews the literature and highlights methodological inconsistences in this field. Most methodological concerns originate from disregarding the interaction of proximate and ultimate causes of this phenomenon. The literature review revealed several studies on family dogs that lack the methodological rigor needed for establishing a well-defined phenotype. The main issues include the chronological threshold accepted for aged dogs, the phenotypical features regarded as pathologic and the method applied to validate different behavioral scales. In addition, no baseline has been established for many studied behavioral and mental features by analyzing healthy adult population of dogs. In family or pet dog samples, the difference in the life expectancy of dog breeds is rarely taken into account, so it is not clear whether the observed changes are due to the normal aging process or are signs of an accelerated decline (senile dementia). We suggest that questionnaire studies should be complemented by behavior test batteries to validate data obtained from owners, and more attention should be given to the composition of the populations involved in the research. An effort should be made to discriminate normal or typical and pathologic aging in future work. Only by adopting a more rigorous approach can we identify risk and protective factors in dogs and reveal the aspects in which the family dog can provide a good animal model for human aging.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-98
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Canidae
Dogs
dogs
dementia
dog breeds
pets
questionnaires
animal models
phenotype
Pets
Life Expectancy
Population
Alzheimer Disease
Animal Models
testing
Phenotype
sampling
methodology
Research

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Behavior
  • Canine cognitive dysfunction
  • CDS
  • Cognitive dysfunction
  • Dog

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

@article{7a085dcbb8b74021af8b0517201f90eb,
title = "Natural or pathologic? Discrepancies in the study of behavioral and cognitive signs in aging family dogs",
abstract = "In recent decades, typical and pathologic behavioral and mental aging in family dogs has received increased attention. This article reviews the literature and highlights methodological inconsistences in this field. Most methodological concerns originate from disregarding the interaction of proximate and ultimate causes of this phenomenon. The literature review revealed several studies on family dogs that lack the methodological rigor needed for establishing a well-defined phenotype. The main issues include the chronological threshold accepted for aged dogs, the phenotypical features regarded as pathologic and the method applied to validate different behavioral scales. In addition, no baseline has been established for many studied behavioral and mental features by analyzing healthy adult population of dogs. In family or pet dog samples, the difference in the life expectancy of dog breeds is rarely taken into account, so it is not clear whether the observed changes are due to the normal aging process or are signs of an accelerated decline (senile dementia). We suggest that questionnaire studies should be complemented by behavior test batteries to validate data obtained from owners, and more attention should be given to the composition of the populations involved in the research. An effort should be made to discriminate normal or typical and pathologic aging in future work. Only by adopting a more rigorous approach can we identify risk and protective factors in dogs and reveal the aspects in which the family dog can provide a good animal model for human aging.",
keywords = "Aging, Behavior, Canine cognitive dysfunction, CDS, Cognitive dysfunction, Dog",
author = "D{\'o}ra Szab{\'o} and Gee, {Nancy R.} and A. Mikl{\'o}si",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jveb.2015.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "86--98",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research",
issn = "1558-7878",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Natural or pathologic? Discrepancies in the study of behavioral and cognitive signs in aging family dogs

AU - Szabó, Dóra

AU - Gee, Nancy R.

AU - Miklósi, A.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - In recent decades, typical and pathologic behavioral and mental aging in family dogs has received increased attention. This article reviews the literature and highlights methodological inconsistences in this field. Most methodological concerns originate from disregarding the interaction of proximate and ultimate causes of this phenomenon. The literature review revealed several studies on family dogs that lack the methodological rigor needed for establishing a well-defined phenotype. The main issues include the chronological threshold accepted for aged dogs, the phenotypical features regarded as pathologic and the method applied to validate different behavioral scales. In addition, no baseline has been established for many studied behavioral and mental features by analyzing healthy adult population of dogs. In family or pet dog samples, the difference in the life expectancy of dog breeds is rarely taken into account, so it is not clear whether the observed changes are due to the normal aging process or are signs of an accelerated decline (senile dementia). We suggest that questionnaire studies should be complemented by behavior test batteries to validate data obtained from owners, and more attention should be given to the composition of the populations involved in the research. An effort should be made to discriminate normal or typical and pathologic aging in future work. Only by adopting a more rigorous approach can we identify risk and protective factors in dogs and reveal the aspects in which the family dog can provide a good animal model for human aging.

AB - In recent decades, typical and pathologic behavioral and mental aging in family dogs has received increased attention. This article reviews the literature and highlights methodological inconsistences in this field. Most methodological concerns originate from disregarding the interaction of proximate and ultimate causes of this phenomenon. The literature review revealed several studies on family dogs that lack the methodological rigor needed for establishing a well-defined phenotype. The main issues include the chronological threshold accepted for aged dogs, the phenotypical features regarded as pathologic and the method applied to validate different behavioral scales. In addition, no baseline has been established for many studied behavioral and mental features by analyzing healthy adult population of dogs. In family or pet dog samples, the difference in the life expectancy of dog breeds is rarely taken into account, so it is not clear whether the observed changes are due to the normal aging process or are signs of an accelerated decline (senile dementia). We suggest that questionnaire studies should be complemented by behavior test batteries to validate data obtained from owners, and more attention should be given to the composition of the populations involved in the research. An effort should be made to discriminate normal or typical and pathologic aging in future work. Only by adopting a more rigorous approach can we identify risk and protective factors in dogs and reveal the aspects in which the family dog can provide a good animal model for human aging.

KW - Aging

KW - Behavior

KW - Canine cognitive dysfunction

KW - CDS

KW - Cognitive dysfunction

KW - Dog

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958840185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958840185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.08.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958840185

VL - 11

SP - 86

EP - 98

JO - Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research

JF - Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research

SN - 1558-7878

ER -