Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: A prospective randomized study

I. Gál, Tamas Solymosi, Zoltan Szabo, Alexander Balint, Gyorgy Bolgar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Since the first description of the minimally invasive totally gasless video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) technique in 1998, relatively few studies have evaluated the outcome of this procedure. The authors review their experiences based on a prospective randomized trial comparing the potential advantages of MIVAT over conventional thyroidectomy. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for either thyroid nodule or diffuse thyroid disease with hyperthyroidism were randomly selected for either MIVAT or conventional thyroidectomy. The exclusion criteria specified nodules larger than 35 mm, thyroid lobe volume greater than 20 ml, thyroiditis, and previous neck irradiation or surgery. Operative time, postoperative complications, and cosmetic results were evaluated using both a verbal response scale and a numeric scale. Results: Both the MIVAT group and the conventional thyroidectomy group included 15 patients. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of age, sex, or indication for operation. The mean operative times were 65.5 ± 18 min. for MIVAT and 43.3 ± 14 min. for conventional thyroidectomy (P = 0.001). No postoperative complications were detected in either group. The cosmetic results, evaluated by both verbal response and numeric scales, were respectively as follows: MIVAT (3.7 ± 0.2 and 7.9 ± 1.2) and conventional thyroidectomy (2.3 ± 0.7 and 4.9 ± 1.3). The differences significantly favored MIVAT (P = 0.028 and P = 0.015, respectively) despite the small number of patients enrolled in this study, and consequently, its limited statistical power. Conclusion: Although the complications are comparable between the two approaches, conventional thyroidectomy involves less operative time. However, MIVAT offers distinct advantages to selected patients in terms of very good to exellent cosmetic results and reduced postoperative distress.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2445-2449
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume22
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Thyroidectomy
Prospective Studies
Operative Time
Cosmetics
Thyroiditis
Thyroid Nodule
Thyroid Diseases
Hyperthyroidism
Thyroid Gland
Neck

Keywords

  • Conventional thyroidectomy
  • Cosmetic results
  • Randomized study
  • Video-assisted thyroidectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy : A prospective randomized study. / Gál, I.; Solymosi, Tamas; Szabo, Zoltan; Balint, Alexander; Bolgar, Gyorgy.

In: Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 22, No. 11, 11.2008, p. 2445-2449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gál, I. ; Solymosi, Tamas ; Szabo, Zoltan ; Balint, Alexander ; Bolgar, Gyorgy. / Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy : A prospective randomized study. In: Surgical Endoscopy. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 11. pp. 2445-2449.
@article{1624199503574bd1aff5667f030a803f,
title = "Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: A prospective randomized study",
abstract = "Background: Since the first description of the minimally invasive totally gasless video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) technique in 1998, relatively few studies have evaluated the outcome of this procedure. The authors review their experiences based on a prospective randomized trial comparing the potential advantages of MIVAT over conventional thyroidectomy. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for either thyroid nodule or diffuse thyroid disease with hyperthyroidism were randomly selected for either MIVAT or conventional thyroidectomy. The exclusion criteria specified nodules larger than 35 mm, thyroid lobe volume greater than 20 ml, thyroiditis, and previous neck irradiation or surgery. Operative time, postoperative complications, and cosmetic results were evaluated using both a verbal response scale and a numeric scale. Results: Both the MIVAT group and the conventional thyroidectomy group included 15 patients. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of age, sex, or indication for operation. The mean operative times were 65.5 ± 18 min. for MIVAT and 43.3 ± 14 min. for conventional thyroidectomy (P = 0.001). No postoperative complications were detected in either group. The cosmetic results, evaluated by both verbal response and numeric scales, were respectively as follows: MIVAT (3.7 ± 0.2 and 7.9 ± 1.2) and conventional thyroidectomy (2.3 ± 0.7 and 4.9 ± 1.3). The differences significantly favored MIVAT (P = 0.028 and P = 0.015, respectively) despite the small number of patients enrolled in this study, and consequently, its limited statistical power. Conclusion: Although the complications are comparable between the two approaches, conventional thyroidectomy involves less operative time. However, MIVAT offers distinct advantages to selected patients in terms of very good to exellent cosmetic results and reduced postoperative distress.",
keywords = "Conventional thyroidectomy, Cosmetic results, Randomized study, Video-assisted thyroidectomy",
author = "I. G{\'a}l and Tamas Solymosi and Zoltan Szabo and Alexander Balint and Gyorgy Bolgar",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-008-9806-2",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "2445--2449",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "1432-2218",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy

T2 - A prospective randomized study

AU - Gál, I.

AU - Solymosi, Tamas

AU - Szabo, Zoltan

AU - Balint, Alexander

AU - Bolgar, Gyorgy

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Background: Since the first description of the minimally invasive totally gasless video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) technique in 1998, relatively few studies have evaluated the outcome of this procedure. The authors review their experiences based on a prospective randomized trial comparing the potential advantages of MIVAT over conventional thyroidectomy. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for either thyroid nodule or diffuse thyroid disease with hyperthyroidism were randomly selected for either MIVAT or conventional thyroidectomy. The exclusion criteria specified nodules larger than 35 mm, thyroid lobe volume greater than 20 ml, thyroiditis, and previous neck irradiation or surgery. Operative time, postoperative complications, and cosmetic results were evaluated using both a verbal response scale and a numeric scale. Results: Both the MIVAT group and the conventional thyroidectomy group included 15 patients. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of age, sex, or indication for operation. The mean operative times were 65.5 ± 18 min. for MIVAT and 43.3 ± 14 min. for conventional thyroidectomy (P = 0.001). No postoperative complications were detected in either group. The cosmetic results, evaluated by both verbal response and numeric scales, were respectively as follows: MIVAT (3.7 ± 0.2 and 7.9 ± 1.2) and conventional thyroidectomy (2.3 ± 0.7 and 4.9 ± 1.3). The differences significantly favored MIVAT (P = 0.028 and P = 0.015, respectively) despite the small number of patients enrolled in this study, and consequently, its limited statistical power. Conclusion: Although the complications are comparable between the two approaches, conventional thyroidectomy involves less operative time. However, MIVAT offers distinct advantages to selected patients in terms of very good to exellent cosmetic results and reduced postoperative distress.

AB - Background: Since the first description of the minimally invasive totally gasless video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) technique in 1998, relatively few studies have evaluated the outcome of this procedure. The authors review their experiences based on a prospective randomized trial comparing the potential advantages of MIVAT over conventional thyroidectomy. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for either thyroid nodule or diffuse thyroid disease with hyperthyroidism were randomly selected for either MIVAT or conventional thyroidectomy. The exclusion criteria specified nodules larger than 35 mm, thyroid lobe volume greater than 20 ml, thyroiditis, and previous neck irradiation or surgery. Operative time, postoperative complications, and cosmetic results were evaluated using both a verbal response scale and a numeric scale. Results: Both the MIVAT group and the conventional thyroidectomy group included 15 patients. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of age, sex, or indication for operation. The mean operative times were 65.5 ± 18 min. for MIVAT and 43.3 ± 14 min. for conventional thyroidectomy (P = 0.001). No postoperative complications were detected in either group. The cosmetic results, evaluated by both verbal response and numeric scales, were respectively as follows: MIVAT (3.7 ± 0.2 and 7.9 ± 1.2) and conventional thyroidectomy (2.3 ± 0.7 and 4.9 ± 1.3). The differences significantly favored MIVAT (P = 0.028 and P = 0.015, respectively) despite the small number of patients enrolled in this study, and consequently, its limited statistical power. Conclusion: Although the complications are comparable between the two approaches, conventional thyroidectomy involves less operative time. However, MIVAT offers distinct advantages to selected patients in terms of very good to exellent cosmetic results and reduced postoperative distress.

KW - Conventional thyroidectomy

KW - Cosmetic results

KW - Randomized study

KW - Video-assisted thyroidectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54049090844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54049090844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-008-9806-2

DO - 10.1007/s00464-008-9806-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 18322739

AN - SCOPUS:54049090844

VL - 22

SP - 2445

EP - 2449

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 1432-2218

IS - 11

ER -