Methodological considerations regarding response bias effect in substance use research: is correlation between the measured variables sufficient?

Andrea Petróczi, Tamás Nepusz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Efforts for drug free sport include developing a better understanding of the behavioural determinants that underline doping with an increased interest in developing anti-doping prevention and intervention programmes. Empirical testing of both is dominated by self-report questionnaires, which is the most widely used method in psychological assessments and sociology polls. Disturbingly, the potential distorting effect of socially desirable responding (SD) is seldom considered in doping research, or dismissed based on weak correlation between some SD measure and the variables of interest. The aim of this report is to draw attention to i) the potential distorting effect of SD and ii) the limitation of using correlation analysis between a SD measure and the individual measures. Models of doping opinion as a potentially contentious issue was tested using structural equation modeling technique (SEM) with and without the SD variable, on a dataset of 278 athletes, assessing the SD effect both at the i) indicator and ii) construct levels, as well as iii) testing SD as an independent variable affecting expressed doping opinion. Participants were categorised by their SD score into high- and low SD groups. Based on low correlation coefficients (

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1
Number of pages1
JournalSubstance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sociology
Athletes
Self Report
Sports
Psychology
Research
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Surveys and Questionnaires
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{7f3a7196f7414bf986f9fa44f0c8820e,
title = "Methodological considerations regarding response bias effect in substance use research: is correlation between the measured variables sufficient?",
abstract = "Efforts for drug free sport include developing a better understanding of the behavioural determinants that underline doping with an increased interest in developing anti-doping prevention and intervention programmes. Empirical testing of both is dominated by self-report questionnaires, which is the most widely used method in psychological assessments and sociology polls. Disturbingly, the potential distorting effect of socially desirable responding (SD) is seldom considered in doping research, or dismissed based on weak correlation between some SD measure and the variables of interest. The aim of this report is to draw attention to i) the potential distorting effect of SD and ii) the limitation of using correlation analysis between a SD measure and the individual measures. Models of doping opinion as a potentially contentious issue was tested using structural equation modeling technique (SEM) with and without the SD variable, on a dataset of 278 athletes, assessing the SD effect both at the i) indicator and ii) construct levels, as well as iii) testing SD as an independent variable affecting expressed doping opinion. Participants were categorised by their SD score into high- and low SD groups. Based on low correlation coefficients (",
author = "Andrea Petr{\'o}czi and Tam{\'a}s Nepusz",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1",
journal = "Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy",
issn = "1747-597X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological considerations regarding response bias effect in substance use research

T2 - is correlation between the measured variables sufficient?

AU - Petróczi, Andrea

AU - Nepusz, Tamás

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Efforts for drug free sport include developing a better understanding of the behavioural determinants that underline doping with an increased interest in developing anti-doping prevention and intervention programmes. Empirical testing of both is dominated by self-report questionnaires, which is the most widely used method in psychological assessments and sociology polls. Disturbingly, the potential distorting effect of socially desirable responding (SD) is seldom considered in doping research, or dismissed based on weak correlation between some SD measure and the variables of interest. The aim of this report is to draw attention to i) the potential distorting effect of SD and ii) the limitation of using correlation analysis between a SD measure and the individual measures. Models of doping opinion as a potentially contentious issue was tested using structural equation modeling technique (SEM) with and without the SD variable, on a dataset of 278 athletes, assessing the SD effect both at the i) indicator and ii) construct levels, as well as iii) testing SD as an independent variable affecting expressed doping opinion. Participants were categorised by their SD score into high- and low SD groups. Based on low correlation coefficients (

AB - Efforts for drug free sport include developing a better understanding of the behavioural determinants that underline doping with an increased interest in developing anti-doping prevention and intervention programmes. Empirical testing of both is dominated by self-report questionnaires, which is the most widely used method in psychological assessments and sociology polls. Disturbingly, the potential distorting effect of socially desirable responding (SD) is seldom considered in doping research, or dismissed based on weak correlation between some SD measure and the variables of interest. The aim of this report is to draw attention to i) the potential distorting effect of SD and ii) the limitation of using correlation analysis between a SD measure and the individual measures. Models of doping opinion as a potentially contentious issue was tested using structural equation modeling technique (SEM) with and without the SD variable, on a dataset of 278 athletes, assessing the SD effect both at the i) indicator and ii) construct levels, as well as iii) testing SD as an independent variable affecting expressed doping opinion. Participants were categorised by their SD score into high- and low SD groups. Based on low correlation coefficients (

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855486569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855486569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21244663

VL - 6

SP - 1

JO - Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

JF - Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

SN - 1747-597X

ER -