Measuring the difference between actual and reported food intakes in the context of energy balance under laboratory conditions

R. James Stubbs, Leona M. O'Reilly, Stephen Whybrow, Zoë Fuller, Alexandra M. Johnstone, B. Livingstone, Patrick Ritz, Graham W. Horgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To date, no study has directly and simultaneously measured the discrepancy between what people actually eat and what they report eating under observation in the context of energy balance (EB). The present study aimed to objectively measure the 'extent' and 'nature' of misreporting of dietary intakes under conditions in which EB and feeding behaviour were continuously monitored. For this purpose, a total of fifty-nine adults were recruited for 12 d, involving two 3 d overt phases and two 3 d covert phases of food intake measurement in a randomised cross-over design. Subjects had ad libitum access to a variety of familiar foods. Food intake was covertly measured using a feeding behaviour suite to establish actual energy and nutrient intakes. During the overt phases, subjects were instructed to self-report food intake using widely accepted methods. Misreporting comprised two separate and synchronous phenomena. Subjects decreased energy intake (EI) when asked to record their food intake (observation effect). The effect was significant in women ( - 8 %, P< 0·001) but not in men ( - 3 %, P< 0·277). The reported EI was 5 to 21 % lower (reporting effect) than the actual intake, depending on the reporting method used. Semi-quantitative techniques gave larger discrepancies. These discrepancies were identical in men and women and non-macronutrient specific. The 'observation' and 'reporting' effects combined to constitute total misreporting, which ranged from 10 to 25 %, depending on the intake measurement assessed. When studied in a laboratory environment and EB was closely monitored, subjects under-reported their food intake and decreased the actual intake when they were aware that their intake was being monitored.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2032-2043
Number of pages12
JournalBritish Journal of Nutrition
Volume111
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 14 2014

Fingerprint

Eating
Energy Intake
Observation
Feeding Behavior
Food
Cross-Over Studies
Self Report

Keywords

  • Dietary intakes
  • Misreporting
  • Under-eating
  • Under-reporting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Measuring the difference between actual and reported food intakes in the context of energy balance under laboratory conditions. / Stubbs, R. James; O'Reilly, Leona M.; Whybrow, Stephen; Fuller, Zoë; Johnstone, Alexandra M.; Livingstone, B.; Ritz, Patrick; Horgan, Graham W.

In: British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 111, No. 11, 14.06.2014, p. 2032-2043.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stubbs, R. James ; O'Reilly, Leona M. ; Whybrow, Stephen ; Fuller, Zoë ; Johnstone, Alexandra M. ; Livingstone, B. ; Ritz, Patrick ; Horgan, Graham W. / Measuring the difference between actual and reported food intakes in the context of energy balance under laboratory conditions. In: British Journal of Nutrition. 2014 ; Vol. 111, No. 11. pp. 2032-2043.
@article{08667a610de3445daf2130df6d3379fe,
title = "Measuring the difference between actual and reported food intakes in the context of energy balance under laboratory conditions",
abstract = "To date, no study has directly and simultaneously measured the discrepancy between what people actually eat and what they report eating under observation in the context of energy balance (EB). The present study aimed to objectively measure the 'extent' and 'nature' of misreporting of dietary intakes under conditions in which EB and feeding behaviour were continuously monitored. For this purpose, a total of fifty-nine adults were recruited for 12 d, involving two 3 d overt phases and two 3 d covert phases of food intake measurement in a randomised cross-over design. Subjects had ad libitum access to a variety of familiar foods. Food intake was covertly measured using a feeding behaviour suite to establish actual energy and nutrient intakes. During the overt phases, subjects were instructed to self-report food intake using widely accepted methods. Misreporting comprised two separate and synchronous phenomena. Subjects decreased energy intake (EI) when asked to record their food intake (observation effect). The effect was significant in women ( - 8 {\%}, P< 0·001) but not in men ( - 3 {\%}, P< 0·277). The reported EI was 5 to 21 {\%} lower (reporting effect) than the actual intake, depending on the reporting method used. Semi-quantitative techniques gave larger discrepancies. These discrepancies were identical in men and women and non-macronutrient specific. The 'observation' and 'reporting' effects combined to constitute total misreporting, which ranged from 10 to 25 {\%}, depending on the intake measurement assessed. When studied in a laboratory environment and EB was closely monitored, subjects under-reported their food intake and decreased the actual intake when they were aware that their intake was being monitored.",
keywords = "Dietary intakes, Misreporting, Under-eating, Under-reporting",
author = "Stubbs, {R. James} and O'Reilly, {Leona M.} and Stephen Whybrow and Zo{\"e} Fuller and Johnstone, {Alexandra M.} and B. Livingstone and Patrick Ritz and Horgan, {Graham W.}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1017/S0007114514000154",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "2032--2043",
journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0007-1145",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the difference between actual and reported food intakes in the context of energy balance under laboratory conditions

AU - Stubbs, R. James

AU - O'Reilly, Leona M.

AU - Whybrow, Stephen

AU - Fuller, Zoë

AU - Johnstone, Alexandra M.

AU - Livingstone, B.

AU - Ritz, Patrick

AU - Horgan, Graham W.

PY - 2014/6/14

Y1 - 2014/6/14

N2 - To date, no study has directly and simultaneously measured the discrepancy between what people actually eat and what they report eating under observation in the context of energy balance (EB). The present study aimed to objectively measure the 'extent' and 'nature' of misreporting of dietary intakes under conditions in which EB and feeding behaviour were continuously monitored. For this purpose, a total of fifty-nine adults were recruited for 12 d, involving two 3 d overt phases and two 3 d covert phases of food intake measurement in a randomised cross-over design. Subjects had ad libitum access to a variety of familiar foods. Food intake was covertly measured using a feeding behaviour suite to establish actual energy and nutrient intakes. During the overt phases, subjects were instructed to self-report food intake using widely accepted methods. Misreporting comprised two separate and synchronous phenomena. Subjects decreased energy intake (EI) when asked to record their food intake (observation effect). The effect was significant in women ( - 8 %, P< 0·001) but not in men ( - 3 %, P< 0·277). The reported EI was 5 to 21 % lower (reporting effect) than the actual intake, depending on the reporting method used. Semi-quantitative techniques gave larger discrepancies. These discrepancies were identical in men and women and non-macronutrient specific. The 'observation' and 'reporting' effects combined to constitute total misreporting, which ranged from 10 to 25 %, depending on the intake measurement assessed. When studied in a laboratory environment and EB was closely monitored, subjects under-reported their food intake and decreased the actual intake when they were aware that their intake was being monitored.

AB - To date, no study has directly and simultaneously measured the discrepancy between what people actually eat and what they report eating under observation in the context of energy balance (EB). The present study aimed to objectively measure the 'extent' and 'nature' of misreporting of dietary intakes under conditions in which EB and feeding behaviour were continuously monitored. For this purpose, a total of fifty-nine adults were recruited for 12 d, involving two 3 d overt phases and two 3 d covert phases of food intake measurement in a randomised cross-over design. Subjects had ad libitum access to a variety of familiar foods. Food intake was covertly measured using a feeding behaviour suite to establish actual energy and nutrient intakes. During the overt phases, subjects were instructed to self-report food intake using widely accepted methods. Misreporting comprised two separate and synchronous phenomena. Subjects decreased energy intake (EI) when asked to record their food intake (observation effect). The effect was significant in women ( - 8 %, P< 0·001) but not in men ( - 3 %, P< 0·277). The reported EI was 5 to 21 % lower (reporting effect) than the actual intake, depending on the reporting method used. Semi-quantitative techniques gave larger discrepancies. These discrepancies were identical in men and women and non-macronutrient specific. The 'observation' and 'reporting' effects combined to constitute total misreporting, which ranged from 10 to 25 %, depending on the intake measurement assessed. When studied in a laboratory environment and EB was closely monitored, subjects under-reported their food intake and decreased the actual intake when they were aware that their intake was being monitored.

KW - Dietary intakes

KW - Misreporting

KW - Under-eating

KW - Under-reporting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900476463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900476463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007114514000154

DO - 10.1017/S0007114514000154

M3 - Article

C2 - 24635904

AN - SCOPUS:84900476463

VL - 111

SP - 2032

EP - 2043

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0007-1145

IS - 11

ER -