Measuring Coping Among Family Members with Substance-Misusing Relatives: Testing Competing Factor Structures of the Coping Questionnaire (CQ) in England and Italy

Zsolt Horváth, Jim Orford, Richard Velleman, Róbert Urbán

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The Coping Questionnaire measures affected family members’ responses to their relatives’ substance misuse related problems. The Coping Questionnaire examines three main coping strategies: engaged, tolerant-inactive, and withdrawal coping. Objectives: The aim of the current study was to compare competing conceptual measurement models across two countries, including one-factor, three-factor, and higher order factor models. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from five previous studies was conducted. Samples of affected family members from England (N = 323) and Italy (N = 165) were aggregated into two country specific groups. Series of confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the degree of model fit and the effects of socio-demographic variables on the coping factors. Results: A bifactor model fitted the data most closely relative to the one- and three-factor models. High rates of common variance (60–65%) were attributable to the general coping factor, while a high proportion of the variance related to the withdrawal coping subscale score was independent (66–89%) of the general coping factor. Family members’ country, age, gender, the type of relationship and the main problematic substance had significant effects on the coping factors. Conclusions: A bifactor model related to coping behaviors is consistent with the theoretical assumptions of the general coping literature. The concept of a general coping factor also fits the theoretical assumptions of the stress-strain-coping-support model, with family members showing a general tendency to cope with the harmful circumstances which arise due to substance misuse.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSubstance Use and Misuse
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

England
Italy
family member
coping
questionnaire
Psychological Adaptation
Statistical Factor Analysis
Demography
withdrawal
Surveys and Questionnaires
coping behavior
secondary analysis

Keywords

  • Affected family members
  • bifactor model
  • confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)
  • stress-strain-coping-support model
  • substance misuse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{f4affd901a5e44e4b845001b3a9376a2,
title = "Measuring Coping Among Family Members with Substance-Misusing Relatives: Testing Competing Factor Structures of the Coping Questionnaire (CQ) in England and Italy",
abstract = "Background: The Coping Questionnaire measures affected family members’ responses to their relatives’ substance misuse related problems. The Coping Questionnaire examines three main coping strategies: engaged, tolerant-inactive, and withdrawal coping. Objectives: The aim of the current study was to compare competing conceptual measurement models across two countries, including one-factor, three-factor, and higher order factor models. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from five previous studies was conducted. Samples of affected family members from England (N = 323) and Italy (N = 165) were aggregated into two country specific groups. Series of confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the degree of model fit and the effects of socio-demographic variables on the coping factors. Results: A bifactor model fitted the data most closely relative to the one- and three-factor models. High rates of common variance (60–65{\%}) were attributable to the general coping factor, while a high proportion of the variance related to the withdrawal coping subscale score was independent (66–89{\%}) of the general coping factor. Family members’ country, age, gender, the type of relationship and the main problematic substance had significant effects on the coping factors. Conclusions: A bifactor model related to coping behaviors is consistent with the theoretical assumptions of the general coping literature. The concept of a general coping factor also fits the theoretical assumptions of the stress-strain-coping-support model, with family members showing a general tendency to cope with the harmful circumstances which arise due to substance misuse.",
keywords = "Affected family members, bifactor model, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), stress-strain-coping-support model, substance misuse",
author = "Zsolt Horv{\'a}th and Jim Orford and Richard Velleman and R{\'o}bert Urb{\'a}n",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10826084.2019.1685547",
language = "English",
journal = "Substance Use and Misuse",
issn = "1082-6084",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring Coping Among Family Members with Substance-Misusing Relatives

T2 - Testing Competing Factor Structures of the Coping Questionnaire (CQ) in England and Italy

AU - Horváth, Zsolt

AU - Orford, Jim

AU - Velleman, Richard

AU - Urbán, Róbert

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: The Coping Questionnaire measures affected family members’ responses to their relatives’ substance misuse related problems. The Coping Questionnaire examines three main coping strategies: engaged, tolerant-inactive, and withdrawal coping. Objectives: The aim of the current study was to compare competing conceptual measurement models across two countries, including one-factor, three-factor, and higher order factor models. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from five previous studies was conducted. Samples of affected family members from England (N = 323) and Italy (N = 165) were aggregated into two country specific groups. Series of confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the degree of model fit and the effects of socio-demographic variables on the coping factors. Results: A bifactor model fitted the data most closely relative to the one- and three-factor models. High rates of common variance (60–65%) were attributable to the general coping factor, while a high proportion of the variance related to the withdrawal coping subscale score was independent (66–89%) of the general coping factor. Family members’ country, age, gender, the type of relationship and the main problematic substance had significant effects on the coping factors. Conclusions: A bifactor model related to coping behaviors is consistent with the theoretical assumptions of the general coping literature. The concept of a general coping factor also fits the theoretical assumptions of the stress-strain-coping-support model, with family members showing a general tendency to cope with the harmful circumstances which arise due to substance misuse.

AB - Background: The Coping Questionnaire measures affected family members’ responses to their relatives’ substance misuse related problems. The Coping Questionnaire examines three main coping strategies: engaged, tolerant-inactive, and withdrawal coping. Objectives: The aim of the current study was to compare competing conceptual measurement models across two countries, including one-factor, three-factor, and higher order factor models. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from five previous studies was conducted. Samples of affected family members from England (N = 323) and Italy (N = 165) were aggregated into two country specific groups. Series of confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the degree of model fit and the effects of socio-demographic variables on the coping factors. Results: A bifactor model fitted the data most closely relative to the one- and three-factor models. High rates of common variance (60–65%) were attributable to the general coping factor, while a high proportion of the variance related to the withdrawal coping subscale score was independent (66–89%) of the general coping factor. Family members’ country, age, gender, the type of relationship and the main problematic substance had significant effects on the coping factors. Conclusions: A bifactor model related to coping behaviors is consistent with the theoretical assumptions of the general coping literature. The concept of a general coping factor also fits the theoretical assumptions of the stress-strain-coping-support model, with family members showing a general tendency to cope with the harmful circumstances which arise due to substance misuse.

KW - Affected family members

KW - bifactor model

KW - confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)

KW - stress-strain-coping-support model

KW - substance misuse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075143127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075143127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10826084.2019.1685547

DO - 10.1080/10826084.2019.1685547

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075143127

JO - Substance Use and Misuse

JF - Substance Use and Misuse

SN - 1082-6084

ER -