Mapping cross-border collaboration and communication in cardiovascular research from 1992 to 2012

Diane Gal, W. Glänzel, Karin R. Sipido

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims The growing burden of cardiovascular disease requires growth in research and innovation. We examine world-wide participation and citation impact across the cardiovascular research landscape from 1992 to 2012; we investigate cross-fertilization between countries and examine whether cross-border collaboration affects impact. Methods and Results State-of-the-art bibliometric methods and indicators are used to identify cardiovascular publications from the Web of Science, and to map trends over time in output, citation impact, and collaboration. The publication output in cardiovascular research has grown steadily from 1992 to 2012 with increased participation worldwide. China has the highest growth as relative share. The USA share initially predominated yet has reduced steadily. Over time, the EU-27 supra-national region has increased its participation above the USA, though on average it has not had greater citation impact than the USA. However, a number of European countries, as well as Australia and Canada, have improved their absolute and relative citation impact above that of the USA by 2006-2012. Europe is a hub of cross-fertilization with strengthening collaborations and strong citation links; the UK, Germany, and France remain central in this network. The USA has the highest number of strong citation links with other countries. All countries, but especially smaller, highly collaborative countries, have higher citation impact for their internationally collaborative research when compared with their domestic publications. Conclusion Participation in cardiovascular research is growing but growth and impact show wide variability between countries. Cross-border collaboration is increasing, in particular within the EU, and is associated with greater citation impact.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1249-1258
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume38
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 21 2017

Fingerprint

Publications
Research
Fertilization
Growth
Bibliometrics
France
Canada
Germany
China
Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • Cardiovascular diseases
  • Citation impact
  • International collaboration
  • Networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Mapping cross-border collaboration and communication in cardiovascular research from 1992 to 2012. / Gal, Diane; Glänzel, W.; Sipido, Karin R.

In: European Heart Journal, Vol. 38, No. 16, 21.04.2017, p. 1249-1258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ceb1a8f1ac064ba9ba0259a8361206ba,
title = "Mapping cross-border collaboration and communication in cardiovascular research from 1992 to 2012",
abstract = "Aims The growing burden of cardiovascular disease requires growth in research and innovation. We examine world-wide participation and citation impact across the cardiovascular research landscape from 1992 to 2012; we investigate cross-fertilization between countries and examine whether cross-border collaboration affects impact. Methods and Results State-of-the-art bibliometric methods and indicators are used to identify cardiovascular publications from the Web of Science, and to map trends over time in output, citation impact, and collaboration. The publication output in cardiovascular research has grown steadily from 1992 to 2012 with increased participation worldwide. China has the highest growth as relative share. The USA share initially predominated yet has reduced steadily. Over time, the EU-27 supra-national region has increased its participation above the USA, though on average it has not had greater citation impact than the USA. However, a number of European countries, as well as Australia and Canada, have improved their absolute and relative citation impact above that of the USA by 2006-2012. Europe is a hub of cross-fertilization with strengthening collaborations and strong citation links; the UK, Germany, and France remain central in this network. The USA has the highest number of strong citation links with other countries. All countries, but especially smaller, highly collaborative countries, have higher citation impact for their internationally collaborative research when compared with their domestic publications. Conclusion Participation in cardiovascular research is growing but growth and impact show wide variability between countries. Cross-border collaboration is increasing, in particular within the EU, and is associated with greater citation impact.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, Cardiovascular diseases, Citation impact, International collaboration, Networks",
author = "Diane Gal and W. Gl{\"a}nzel and Sipido, {Karin R.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/ehw459",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1249--1258",
journal = "European Heart Journal",
issn = "0195-668X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping cross-border collaboration and communication in cardiovascular research from 1992 to 2012

AU - Gal, Diane

AU - Glänzel, W.

AU - Sipido, Karin R.

PY - 2017/4/21

Y1 - 2017/4/21

N2 - Aims The growing burden of cardiovascular disease requires growth in research and innovation. We examine world-wide participation and citation impact across the cardiovascular research landscape from 1992 to 2012; we investigate cross-fertilization between countries and examine whether cross-border collaboration affects impact. Methods and Results State-of-the-art bibliometric methods and indicators are used to identify cardiovascular publications from the Web of Science, and to map trends over time in output, citation impact, and collaboration. The publication output in cardiovascular research has grown steadily from 1992 to 2012 with increased participation worldwide. China has the highest growth as relative share. The USA share initially predominated yet has reduced steadily. Over time, the EU-27 supra-national region has increased its participation above the USA, though on average it has not had greater citation impact than the USA. However, a number of European countries, as well as Australia and Canada, have improved their absolute and relative citation impact above that of the USA by 2006-2012. Europe is a hub of cross-fertilization with strengthening collaborations and strong citation links; the UK, Germany, and France remain central in this network. The USA has the highest number of strong citation links with other countries. All countries, but especially smaller, highly collaborative countries, have higher citation impact for their internationally collaborative research when compared with their domestic publications. Conclusion Participation in cardiovascular research is growing but growth and impact show wide variability between countries. Cross-border collaboration is increasing, in particular within the EU, and is associated with greater citation impact.

AB - Aims The growing burden of cardiovascular disease requires growth in research and innovation. We examine world-wide participation and citation impact across the cardiovascular research landscape from 1992 to 2012; we investigate cross-fertilization between countries and examine whether cross-border collaboration affects impact. Methods and Results State-of-the-art bibliometric methods and indicators are used to identify cardiovascular publications from the Web of Science, and to map trends over time in output, citation impact, and collaboration. The publication output in cardiovascular research has grown steadily from 1992 to 2012 with increased participation worldwide. China has the highest growth as relative share. The USA share initially predominated yet has reduced steadily. Over time, the EU-27 supra-national region has increased its participation above the USA, though on average it has not had greater citation impact than the USA. However, a number of European countries, as well as Australia and Canada, have improved their absolute and relative citation impact above that of the USA by 2006-2012. Europe is a hub of cross-fertilization with strengthening collaborations and strong citation links; the UK, Germany, and France remain central in this network. The USA has the highest number of strong citation links with other countries. All countries, but especially smaller, highly collaborative countries, have higher citation impact for their internationally collaborative research when compared with their domestic publications. Conclusion Participation in cardiovascular research is growing but growth and impact show wide variability between countries. Cross-border collaboration is increasing, in particular within the EU, and is associated with greater citation impact.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - Cardiovascular diseases

KW - Citation impact

KW - International collaboration

KW - Networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018873369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018873369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw459

DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw459

M3 - Article

C2 - 27997881

AN - SCOPUS:85018873369

VL - 38

SP - 1249

EP - 1258

JO - European Heart Journal

JF - European Heart Journal

SN - 0195-668X

IS - 16

ER -