Local richness-species pool ratio: A consequence of the species-area relationship

S. Bartha, Péter Ittzés

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A constant ratio between species richnesses estimated at the local and regional scale is interpreted as a proof of quasi-neutral unsaturated communities. Based on Zobel's model of plant community (ZOBEL, Folia Geobot. 36: 3-8, 2001) we tested the methodology of the species-pool concept by comparing the saturated and unsaturated communities generated by spatially-explicit mechanistic simulations with known assembly rules. Tests show that local-regional species plots can be applied to distinguish saturated vs. unsaturated communities, however, the outcome of tests, i.e. the relationship between local and regional richness depends on the size of the areas compared. Independently from the mechanisms controlling diversity, trivial saturation will appear if one of the scales is either too small or too broad because species-area curves are bound at these extreme scales. Similarly, trivial unsaturation will appear if the two scales compared are close to each other. The application of species-area curves is useful because they help to find scales for non-trivial relationships. Field tests reporting quasi-neutrality and unsaturated plant communities were performed at the intermediate scales of the corresponding species-area curves, and they were estimated from heterogeneous samples. Therefore, this field evidence might be biased by scaling artefacts. We propose to reanalyze the field evidence with solid scaling conventions and to restrict the concept of quasi-neutrality to subordinated functional groups based on the following hypotheses: (1) neutrality will appear within subordinated guilds as a consequence of the hierarchical structure of plant communities; (2) the lower a guild in the hierarchy the higher neutrality of within-layer processes detected; (3) quasi-neutrality found at the community level is not a proof of community-level neutrality but it is due to the higher number of subordinated species in the samples.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-23
Number of pages15
JournalFolia Geobotanica
Volume36
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

species-area relationship
species pool
plant community
plant communities
guild
species diversity
assembly rule
testing
functional group
artifact
saturation
sampling
methodology
simulation
test

Keywords

  • Abundance distribution
  • Coexistence mechanisms
  • Dispersal limitation
  • Individual based null models
  • Methodology
  • Niche limitation
  • Spatial pattern
  • Spatially explicit simulations
  • Species saturation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Palaeontology
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Local richness-species pool ratio : A consequence of the species-area relationship. / Bartha, S.; Ittzés, Péter.

In: Folia Geobotanica, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2001, p. 9-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3fc026416bfd4f4484d14ebcb061cbed,
title = "Local richness-species pool ratio: A consequence of the species-area relationship",
abstract = "A constant ratio between species richnesses estimated at the local and regional scale is interpreted as a proof of quasi-neutral unsaturated communities. Based on Zobel's model of plant community (ZOBEL, Folia Geobot. 36: 3-8, 2001) we tested the methodology of the species-pool concept by comparing the saturated and unsaturated communities generated by spatially-explicit mechanistic simulations with known assembly rules. Tests show that local-regional species plots can be applied to distinguish saturated vs. unsaturated communities, however, the outcome of tests, i.e. the relationship between local and regional richness depends on the size of the areas compared. Independently from the mechanisms controlling diversity, trivial saturation will appear if one of the scales is either too small or too broad because species-area curves are bound at these extreme scales. Similarly, trivial unsaturation will appear if the two scales compared are close to each other. The application of species-area curves is useful because they help to find scales for non-trivial relationships. Field tests reporting quasi-neutrality and unsaturated plant communities were performed at the intermediate scales of the corresponding species-area curves, and they were estimated from heterogeneous samples. Therefore, this field evidence might be biased by scaling artefacts. We propose to reanalyze the field evidence with solid scaling conventions and to restrict the concept of quasi-neutrality to subordinated functional groups based on the following hypotheses: (1) neutrality will appear within subordinated guilds as a consequence of the hierarchical structure of plant communities; (2) the lower a guild in the hierarchy the higher neutrality of within-layer processes detected; (3) quasi-neutrality found at the community level is not a proof of community-level neutrality but it is due to the higher number of subordinated species in the samples.",
keywords = "Abundance distribution, Coexistence mechanisms, Dispersal limitation, Individual based null models, Methodology, Niche limitation, Spatial pattern, Spatially explicit simulations, Species saturation",
author = "S. Bartha and P{\'e}ter Ittz{\'e}s",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "9--23",
journal = "Folia Geobotanica",
issn = "1211-9520",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local richness-species pool ratio

T2 - A consequence of the species-area relationship

AU - Bartha, S.

AU - Ittzés, Péter

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - A constant ratio between species richnesses estimated at the local and regional scale is interpreted as a proof of quasi-neutral unsaturated communities. Based on Zobel's model of plant community (ZOBEL, Folia Geobot. 36: 3-8, 2001) we tested the methodology of the species-pool concept by comparing the saturated and unsaturated communities generated by spatially-explicit mechanistic simulations with known assembly rules. Tests show that local-regional species plots can be applied to distinguish saturated vs. unsaturated communities, however, the outcome of tests, i.e. the relationship between local and regional richness depends on the size of the areas compared. Independently from the mechanisms controlling diversity, trivial saturation will appear if one of the scales is either too small or too broad because species-area curves are bound at these extreme scales. Similarly, trivial unsaturation will appear if the two scales compared are close to each other. The application of species-area curves is useful because they help to find scales for non-trivial relationships. Field tests reporting quasi-neutrality and unsaturated plant communities were performed at the intermediate scales of the corresponding species-area curves, and they were estimated from heterogeneous samples. Therefore, this field evidence might be biased by scaling artefacts. We propose to reanalyze the field evidence with solid scaling conventions and to restrict the concept of quasi-neutrality to subordinated functional groups based on the following hypotheses: (1) neutrality will appear within subordinated guilds as a consequence of the hierarchical structure of plant communities; (2) the lower a guild in the hierarchy the higher neutrality of within-layer processes detected; (3) quasi-neutrality found at the community level is not a proof of community-level neutrality but it is due to the higher number of subordinated species in the samples.

AB - A constant ratio between species richnesses estimated at the local and regional scale is interpreted as a proof of quasi-neutral unsaturated communities. Based on Zobel's model of plant community (ZOBEL, Folia Geobot. 36: 3-8, 2001) we tested the methodology of the species-pool concept by comparing the saturated and unsaturated communities generated by spatially-explicit mechanistic simulations with known assembly rules. Tests show that local-regional species plots can be applied to distinguish saturated vs. unsaturated communities, however, the outcome of tests, i.e. the relationship between local and regional richness depends on the size of the areas compared. Independently from the mechanisms controlling diversity, trivial saturation will appear if one of the scales is either too small or too broad because species-area curves are bound at these extreme scales. Similarly, trivial unsaturation will appear if the two scales compared are close to each other. The application of species-area curves is useful because they help to find scales for non-trivial relationships. Field tests reporting quasi-neutrality and unsaturated plant communities were performed at the intermediate scales of the corresponding species-area curves, and they were estimated from heterogeneous samples. Therefore, this field evidence might be biased by scaling artefacts. We propose to reanalyze the field evidence with solid scaling conventions and to restrict the concept of quasi-neutrality to subordinated functional groups based on the following hypotheses: (1) neutrality will appear within subordinated guilds as a consequence of the hierarchical structure of plant communities; (2) the lower a guild in the hierarchy the higher neutrality of within-layer processes detected; (3) quasi-neutrality found at the community level is not a proof of community-level neutrality but it is due to the higher number of subordinated species in the samples.

KW - Abundance distribution

KW - Coexistence mechanisms

KW - Dispersal limitation

KW - Individual based null models

KW - Methodology

KW - Niche limitation

KW - Spatial pattern

KW - Spatially explicit simulations

KW - Species saturation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035021413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035021413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035021413

VL - 36

SP - 9

EP - 23

JO - Folia Geobotanica

JF - Folia Geobotanica

SN - 1211-9520

IS - 1

ER -